Comparing India's Second COVID Wave with the First Wave-A Single-Center Experience.

Mayank Kapoor, Budha O Singh, Prasan Kumar Panda, Pathik Dhanger, Anant Kataria
{"title":"Comparing India's Second COVID Wave with the First Wave-A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Mayank Kapoor,&nbsp;Budha O Singh,&nbsp;Prasan Kumar Panda,&nbsp;Pathik Dhanger,&nbsp;Anant Kataria","doi":"10.2174/2772434417666220628153110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has resurfaced in India as a hardhitting second wave. This study aims to compare the clinical profile of the first wave (April-June 2020) and the second wave (March-May 2021) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) in a single tertiary care center in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we examined the demographic profile, symptoms at presentation, severity of illness, baseline investigations, treatments received, underlying comorbidities, and outcomes of the COVID-19 patients belonging to the first (W1) and the second wave (W2) of the pandemic in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age group affected most in the W2 is 50.5 (17.7) versus 37·1 (16·9) years for W1. The baseline oxygen saturation is lower in W2, being 84·0 (13·4) % compared with 91·9 (7·4) % in W1 [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]. 70.2 % of the cases belonged to the severe category in W2 compared to 37.5% in W1. W2 has worse outcomes. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [48.7% v/s 6.45%; OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), P<0.0001], Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) [18% v/s 2.4%; OR 6 (1.7- 22.2), P = 0.005], Acute Liver Injury (transaminitis) [12.8% v/s 6.4%, OR 7.3 (3.7- 14.3), P < 0.0001], and deaths (29% v/s 9.6%, standardized mortality ratio 3.5) is higher in W2. Similarly, the CT severity score for W2 [29.5 (6.7)] was higher than W1 [23·2 (11·5), P < 0.05]. The proportion of patients requiring oxygen [81.8% v/s 11.2%; OR 125 (40-333.3), P < 0.0001], high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (11.4% v/s 5.6%), Non- Invasive Ventilation (NIV) (41.2% v/s 1.5%), invasive ventilation [24.5% v/s 0.9%; OR 22.72 (2.94-166.6), P = 0.003], as well as ICU/HDU admissions [56.4% v/s 12.0%; OR 10.5 (5.3-21.2), P < 0.0001] was higher for W2 as compared with W1. Cough, invasive ventilation, inotrope requirement, and ARDS are significantly related to higher mortality in the W2 than W1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher age, oxygen requirement, ventilator requirement, ICU admission, and organ failure are more prevalent in the admitted COVID-19 cases during the second wave that hit India than in the first wave and are associated with more fatalities. Strategy for another wave should be planned accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":74643,"journal":{"name":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","volume":"17 3","pages":"178-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772434417666220628153110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resurfaced in India as a hardhitting second wave. This study aims to compare the clinical profile of the first wave (April-June 2020) and the second wave (March-May 2021) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) in a single tertiary care center in India.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we examined the demographic profile, symptoms at presentation, severity of illness, baseline investigations, treatments received, underlying comorbidities, and outcomes of the COVID-19 patients belonging to the first (W1) and the second wave (W2) of the pandemic in India.

Results: The age group affected most in the W2 is 50.5 (17.7) versus 37·1 (16·9) years for W1. The baseline oxygen saturation is lower in W2, being 84·0 (13·4) % compared with 91·9 (7·4) % in W1 [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]. 70.2 % of the cases belonged to the severe category in W2 compared to 37.5% in W1. W2 has worse outcomes. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [48.7% v/s 6.45%; OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), P<0.0001], Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) [18% v/s 2.4%; OR 6 (1.7- 22.2), P = 0.005], Acute Liver Injury (transaminitis) [12.8% v/s 6.4%, OR 7.3 (3.7- 14.3), P < 0.0001], and deaths (29% v/s 9.6%, standardized mortality ratio 3.5) is higher in W2. Similarly, the CT severity score for W2 [29.5 (6.7)] was higher than W1 [23·2 (11·5), P < 0.05]. The proportion of patients requiring oxygen [81.8% v/s 11.2%; OR 125 (40-333.3), P < 0.0001], high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (11.4% v/s 5.6%), Non- Invasive Ventilation (NIV) (41.2% v/s 1.5%), invasive ventilation [24.5% v/s 0.9%; OR 22.72 (2.94-166.6), P = 0.003], as well as ICU/HDU admissions [56.4% v/s 12.0%; OR 10.5 (5.3-21.2), P < 0.0001] was higher for W2 as compared with W1. Cough, invasive ventilation, inotrope requirement, and ARDS are significantly related to higher mortality in the W2 than W1.

Conclusion: Higher age, oxygen requirement, ventilator requirement, ICU admission, and organ failure are more prevalent in the admitted COVID-19 cases during the second wave that hit India than in the first wave and are associated with more fatalities. Strategy for another wave should be planned accordingly.

印度第二波疫情与第一波疫情的比较——单中心体验
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在印度再次出现,成为第二波严重疫情。本研究旨在比较印度一个三级医疗中心第一波(2020年4月至6月)和第二波(2021年3月至5月)严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2大流行(SARS-CoV-2)的临床特征。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们检查了印度属于大流行第一波(W1)和第二波(W2)的COVID-19患者的人口统计学特征、首发症状、疾病严重程度、基线调查、接受的治疗、潜在合并症和结局。结果:W2发病年龄为50.5(17.7)岁,W1发病年龄为37.1(16.9)岁。基线血氧饱和度在W2组较低,为88.4(13.4)%,而在W1组为99.1 (7.4)% [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]。W2重症病例占70.2%,W1重症病例占37.5%。W2的结果更差。急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发病率[48.7% v/s 6.45%;OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), p结论:与第一波相比,在印度第二波COVID-19入院病例中,年龄、需氧量、呼吸机需求、ICU入院和器官衰竭更为普遍,并与更多的死亡相关。应该相应地规划另一波浪潮的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信