Immediate and lasting effects of different regulation of craving strategies on cue-induced craving and the late positive potential in smokers

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Solvej Nickel, Tanja Endrass, Raoul Dieterich
{"title":"Immediate and lasting effects of different regulation of craving strategies on cue-induced craving and the late positive potential in smokers","authors":"Solvej Nickel,&nbsp;Tanja Endrass,&nbsp;Raoul Dieterich","doi":"10.1111/adb.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Craving, induced by substance-related cues, contributes to continued substance use and relapse. Therefore, regulation of craving (ROC) is important for treatment success. Distraction involves disengaging from craving-inducing cues; whereas, reappraisal requires engaging with potential risks of substance use. Given this difference in elaboration, we addressed the question whether reappraisal entails lasting advantages over distraction in successful ROC. To elucidate how this is implemented neurally, we examined the late positive potential (LPP) as an electrocortical indicator of motivated attention to cues. <i>N</i> = 62 smokers viewed smoking-related pictures and indicated the degree of craving each picture induced. While viewing the pictures, EEG was recorded, and the participants focused on the long-term negative (LATER) or short-term positive (NOW) consequences of smoking or performed an arithmetic task to distract themselves from processing the pictures (DISTRACT). After a break, all pictures were presented again without regulation instruction (re-exposure). Results revealed that LATER and DISTRACT achieved similar degrees of immediate ROC success, but only LATER had a sustained effect during re-exposure. In contrast, LPP amplitudes were more prominently reduced during DISTRACT than LATER, and there was no difference in LPP amplitudes during re-exposure. These findings imply that it may be beneficial to engage with the risks of drug use (reappraisal) rather than avoiding triggers of craving (distraction). However, these effects do not seem to be mediated by lasting changes in cue-related motivated attention (LPP).</p>","PeriodicalId":7289,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Biology","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adb.13315","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adb.13315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Craving, induced by substance-related cues, contributes to continued substance use and relapse. Therefore, regulation of craving (ROC) is important for treatment success. Distraction involves disengaging from craving-inducing cues; whereas, reappraisal requires engaging with potential risks of substance use. Given this difference in elaboration, we addressed the question whether reappraisal entails lasting advantages over distraction in successful ROC. To elucidate how this is implemented neurally, we examined the late positive potential (LPP) as an electrocortical indicator of motivated attention to cues. N = 62 smokers viewed smoking-related pictures and indicated the degree of craving each picture induced. While viewing the pictures, EEG was recorded, and the participants focused on the long-term negative (LATER) or short-term positive (NOW) consequences of smoking or performed an arithmetic task to distract themselves from processing the pictures (DISTRACT). After a break, all pictures were presented again without regulation instruction (re-exposure). Results revealed that LATER and DISTRACT achieved similar degrees of immediate ROC success, but only LATER had a sustained effect during re-exposure. In contrast, LPP amplitudes were more prominently reduced during DISTRACT than LATER, and there was no difference in LPP amplitudes during re-exposure. These findings imply that it may be beneficial to engage with the risks of drug use (reappraisal) rather than avoiding triggers of craving (distraction). However, these effects do not seem to be mediated by lasting changes in cue-related motivated attention (LPP).

Abstract Image

不同渴望策略对吸烟者线索诱导渴望和晚期正性潜能的即时和持久影响
由物质相关线索引起的渴望会导致持续的物质使用和复发。因此,渴望的调节(ROC)对治疗成功至关重要。分散注意力包括脱离诱导渴望的线索;然而,重新评估需要参与物质使用的潜在风险。考虑到这种阐述上的差异,我们讨论了在成功的ROC中,重新评估是否比分散注意力具有持久的优势。为了阐明这是如何在神经上实现的,我们研究了晚期正电位(LPP)作为对线索的动机性注意的电皮层指标。N = 62名吸烟者观看与吸烟有关的图片,并指出每张图片引起的渴望程度。在观看图片时,记录脑电图,参与者专注于吸烟的长期消极(LATER)或短期积极(NOW)后果,或执行算术任务以分散自己对图片的处理。休息后,所有图片在没有调节说明的情况下再次呈现(重新曝光)。结果显示,LATER和distraction获得了相似程度的即时ROC成功,但只有LATER在再暴露期间具有持续的效果。相比之下,分散时的LPP振幅比延迟时降低得更明显,再暴露时的LPP振幅没有差异。这些发现表明,正视药物使用的风险(重新评估)可能比避免引起渴望的因素(分散注意力)更有益。然而,这些影响似乎并不是由线索相关动机注意(LPP)的持续变化所介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Biology
Addiction Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Biology is focused on neuroscience contributions and it aims to advance our understanding of the action of drugs of abuse and addictive processes. Papers are accepted in both animal experimentation or clinical research. The content is geared towards behavioral, molecular, genetic, biochemical, neuro-biological and pharmacology aspects of these fields. Addiction Biology includes peer-reviewed original research reports and reviews. Addiction Biology is published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and other Drugs (SSA). Members of the Society for the Study of Addiction receive the Journal as part of their annual membership subscription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信