Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Sleep-Disordered Breathing Patients.

Q3 Medicine
Elvie Zulka Kautzia Rachmawati, Retno S Wardhani, Rahmanofa Yunizaf, Saptawati Bardosono, Fikri Mirza Putranto, Niken Ageng Rizki, Nabilla Calista, Susyana Tamin
{"title":"Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Sleep-Disordered Breathing Patients.","authors":"Elvie Zulka Kautzia Rachmawati,&nbsp;Retno S Wardhani,&nbsp;Rahmanofa Yunizaf,&nbsp;Saptawati Bardosono,&nbsp;Fikri Mirza Putranto,&nbsp;Niken Ageng Rizki,&nbsp;Nabilla Calista,&nbsp;Susyana Tamin","doi":"10.22038/IJORL.2022.57515.2991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our study aims to evaluate the distribution of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) via the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and to describe the sleep architecture in SDB patients with and without LPR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted. Patients with SDB were identified via the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-BANG questionnaire; they were then screened with the RSI and physical examination for LPR. PSG was performed to evaluate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45 patients, 15 were scored as having LPR via the RSI. Utilizing the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI), patients were further classified into four groups: 9 non-LPR with non-OSA SDB, 21 non-LPR with OSA, 4 LPR with non-OSA SDB, and 11 LPR with OSA. The prevalence of LPR was 30.8% in the non-OSA SDB group and 34.4% in the OSA group. All SDB parameters in both groups were similar. SDB patients with high body mass index tended to have LPR and/or OSA. Average ESS scores in the four groups suggested excessive daytime sleepiness, and patients with LPR had higher ESS scores. Regardless of LPR status, SDB patients had a lower percentage of REM sleep and a higher percentage of light sleep.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of LPR in OSA patients was similar in non-OSA SDB patients. REM sleep percentage decreased in the four groups, with the non-OSA SDB group having the lowest percentage of REM sleep; light sleep percentage increased in the four groups, with the OSA group having the highest percentage of light sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":14607,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"34 125","pages":"303-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2022.57515.2991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our study aims to evaluate the distribution of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) via the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and to describe the sleep architecture in SDB patients with and without LPR.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted. Patients with SDB were identified via the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-BANG questionnaire; they were then screened with the RSI and physical examination for LPR. PSG was performed to evaluate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Results: Of 45 patients, 15 were scored as having LPR via the RSI. Utilizing the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI), patients were further classified into four groups: 9 non-LPR with non-OSA SDB, 21 non-LPR with OSA, 4 LPR with non-OSA SDB, and 11 LPR with OSA. The prevalence of LPR was 30.8% in the non-OSA SDB group and 34.4% in the OSA group. All SDB parameters in both groups were similar. SDB patients with high body mass index tended to have LPR and/or OSA. Average ESS scores in the four groups suggested excessive daytime sleepiness, and patients with LPR had higher ESS scores. Regardless of LPR status, SDB patients had a lower percentage of REM sleep and a higher percentage of light sleep.

Conclusions: The incidence of LPR in OSA patients was similar in non-OSA SDB patients. REM sleep percentage decreased in the four groups, with the non-OSA SDB group having the lowest percentage of REM sleep; light sleep percentage increased in the four groups, with the OSA group having the highest percentage of light sleep.

Abstract Image

睡眠呼吸障碍患者的咽喉反流
前言:本研究旨在通过反流症状指数(RSI)评估睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)患者喉咽反流(LPR)的分布,描述伴有和不伴有LPR的SDB患者的睡眠结构。材料与方法:采用横断面描述性研究。通过Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和STOP-BANG问卷对SDB患者进行识别;然后对他们进行RSI和LPR体检。采用PSG评价阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。结果:45例患者中,15例经RSI评分为LPR。采用呼吸障碍指数(RDI)将患者进一步分为4组:非LPR合并非OSA SDB 9例,非LPR合并OSA 21例,LPR合并非OSA SDB 4例,LPR合并OSA 11例。非OSA SDB组LPR患病率为30.8%,OSA组为34.4%。两组的SDB参数相似。体重指数高的SDB患者易发生LPR和/或OSA。四组的平均ESS评分表明白天嗜睡过度,LPR患者的ESS评分更高。无论LPR状态如何,SDB患者REM睡眠的比例较低,浅睡眠的比例较高。结论:OSA患者的LPR发生率与非OSA SDB患者相似。四组快速眼动睡眠比例均有所下降,其中非osa SDB组快速眼动睡眠比例最低;轻度睡眠的比例在四组中都有所增加,其中OSA组的轻度睡眠比例最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信