Psychological distress and gender predict cognitive complaint after adult civilian mild traumatic brain injury in pre-morbidly healthy adults.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1080/09602011.2023.2236348
Arielle M Levy, Michael M Saling, Jacqueline F I Anderson
{"title":"Psychological distress and gender predict cognitive complaint after adult civilian mild traumatic brain injury in pre-morbidly healthy adults.","authors":"Arielle M Levy, Michael M Saling, Jacqueline F I Anderson","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2023.2236348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective cognitive symptoms are common after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and are associated with important outcome factors including return to work. This study examined self-reported cognitive symptoms in mTBI and trauma controls (TCs), and explored psychological distress and gender as predictors of these symptoms. Pre-morbidly healthy adults with mTBI (<i>n</i> = 68) and general trauma (<i>n</i> = 40) were prospectively recruited from inpatient hospital wards and assessed 6-10 weeks post-injury. Primary measures included self-reported cognitive symptoms, post-concussion symptoms, and psychological distress. Groups were matched on all background variables, including objective cognitive performance. Within this context, subjective cognitive symptoms were significantly elevated after mTBI relative to TCs (<i>t</i> <i>= </i>3.396, <i>p</i> = .001). In contrast, there was no difference in post-concussion symptoms between groups (<i>t</i> <i>= </i>1.275, <i>p</i> = .206). Psychological distress (<i>β</i> = .536, <i>p</i> < .001) and gender (<i>β</i> = .253, <i>p</i> = .012) predicted subjective cognitive symptoms in mTBI, with females and those with higher distress reporting greater symptoms. Unlike general post-concussion symptoms, subjective cognitive symptoms were elevated after mTBI relative to TCs, suggesting that mTBI-specific factors underly this elevation. Females and individuals with high psychological distress are important subgroups to consider for potential intervention following mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2236348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subjective cognitive symptoms are common after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and are associated with important outcome factors including return to work. This study examined self-reported cognitive symptoms in mTBI and trauma controls (TCs), and explored psychological distress and gender as predictors of these symptoms. Pre-morbidly healthy adults with mTBI (n = 68) and general trauma (n = 40) were prospectively recruited from inpatient hospital wards and assessed 6-10 weeks post-injury. Primary measures included self-reported cognitive symptoms, post-concussion symptoms, and psychological distress. Groups were matched on all background variables, including objective cognitive performance. Within this context, subjective cognitive symptoms were significantly elevated after mTBI relative to TCs (t= 3.396, p = .001). In contrast, there was no difference in post-concussion symptoms between groups (t= 1.275, p = .206). Psychological distress (β = .536, p < .001) and gender (β = .253, p = .012) predicted subjective cognitive symptoms in mTBI, with females and those with higher distress reporting greater symptoms. Unlike general post-concussion symptoms, subjective cognitive symptoms were elevated after mTBI relative to TCs, suggesting that mTBI-specific factors underly this elevation. Females and individuals with high psychological distress are important subgroups to consider for potential intervention following mTBI.

心理困扰和性别可预测病前健康成年人在成年平民轻度脑外伤后的认知抱怨。
主观认知症状在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后很常见,并与包括重返工作岗位在内的重要结果因素相关。本研究调查了轻微创伤性脑损伤患者和创伤对照组(TCs)自我报告的认知症状,并探讨了心理困扰和性别对这些症状的预测作用。研究人员前瞻性地从医院住院病房招募了患有 mTBI(68 人)和一般创伤(40 人)的病前健康成人,并在伤后 6-10 周进行了评估。主要测量指标包括自我报告的认知症状、脑震荡后症状和心理困扰。各组的所有背景变量(包括客观认知表现)均匹配。在这种情况下,相对于脑震荡患者,创伤后脑震荡患者的主观认知症状明显升高(t = 3.396,p = .001)。相比之下,组间脑震荡后症状没有差异(t = 1.275,p = .206)。心理困扰(β = .536,p β = .253,p = .012)可预测 mTBI 患者的主观认知症状,女性和心理困扰程度较高的人报告的症状更严重。与一般脑震荡后症状不同的是,mTBI 后的主观认知症状相对于脑震荡后症状有所升高,这表明mTBI 的特异性因素是主观认知症状升高的基础。女性和心理压力大的人是mTBI后可能进行干预时需要考虑的重要亚群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信