Prediction of Helmet Use Behavior among Motorcyclists Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai, Ehsan Vesali-Monfared, Majid Barati, Leili Tapak
{"title":"Prediction of Helmet Use Behavior among Motorcyclists Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.","authors":"Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai,&nbsp;Ehsan Vesali-Monfared,&nbsp;Majid Barati,&nbsp;Leili Tapak","doi":"10.34172/jrhs.2022.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are one of the most critical factors that endanger human health. More specifically, head and neck injuries are the main causes of deaths and disabilities among motorcyclists. This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of helmet use behavior among motorcyclists based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study followed the cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted on randomly selected 730 motorcyclist employees in Qom, Iran, in 2021. The data collection tool was a self-administered researcher-made questionnaire, including items on demographic characteristics, history of RTIs, and constructs of TPB. Data were analyzed using descriptive summary statistics, analysis of variance, independent samples <i>t</i> test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and structural equation modeling (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, only 9.8% of the participants reported that they always used a helmet while riding a motorcycle. About 60% reported a history of a motorcycle crash, and 11.5% had a history of head injuries. The direct effect of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control on the intention to use a helmet were statistically significant, explaining 59% of the variation in behavioral intention (intention to use a helmet) (R<sup>2</sup>=0.59). Moreover, perceived behavioral control and behavioral intention had significant effects on helmet use behavior (R<sup>2</sup>=0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of helmet use among the studied population was very low. Moreover, TPB was useful in identifying the determinants of behavior and especially behavioral intention of helmet use among motorcyclists.</p>","PeriodicalId":17164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in health sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422160/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.2022.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are one of the most critical factors that endanger human health. More specifically, head and neck injuries are the main causes of deaths and disabilities among motorcyclists. This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of helmet use behavior among motorcyclists based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB).

Study design: This study followed the cross-sectional design.

Methods: This study was conducted on randomly selected 730 motorcyclist employees in Qom, Iran, in 2021. The data collection tool was a self-administered researcher-made questionnaire, including items on demographic characteristics, history of RTIs, and constructs of TPB. Data were analyzed using descriptive summary statistics, analysis of variance, independent samples t test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: In this study, only 9.8% of the participants reported that they always used a helmet while riding a motorcycle. About 60% reported a history of a motorcycle crash, and 11.5% had a history of head injuries. The direct effect of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control on the intention to use a helmet were statistically significant, explaining 59% of the variation in behavioral intention (intention to use a helmet) (R2=0.59). Moreover, perceived behavioral control and behavioral intention had significant effects on helmet use behavior (R2=0.26).

Conclusion: The prevalence of helmet use among the studied population was very low. Moreover, TPB was useful in identifying the determinants of behavior and especially behavioral intention of helmet use among motorcyclists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于计划行为理论的摩托车驾驶员头盔使用行为预测
背景:道路交通伤害是危害人类健康的重要因素之一。更具体地说,头部和颈部受伤是摩托车手死亡和残疾的主要原因。本研究旨在基于计划行为理论探讨摩托车手头盔使用行为的预测因素。研究设计:本研究采用横断面设计。方法:本研究于2021年在伊朗库姆随机选择730名摩托车从业人员进行。数据收集工具是一份自我管理的调查问卷,包括人口统计学特征、rti病史和TPB结构。采用描述性汇总统计、方差分析、独立样本t检验、Pearson相关系数和结构方程模型(SEM)对数据进行分析。结果:在本研究中,只有9.8%的参与者报告他们在骑摩托车时总是戴头盔。约60%的人报告有摩托车碰撞史,11.5%的人有头部受伤史。态度、主观规范和感知行为控制对使用头盔意愿的直接影响具有统计学意义,解释了59%的行为意愿(使用头盔意愿)变异(R2=0.59)。感知行为控制和行为意向对头盔使用行为有显著影响(R2=0.26)。结论:研究人群中头盔的使用率很低。此外,TPB有助于确定摩托车手的行为决定因素,特别是头盔使用的行为意向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of research in health sciences
Journal of research in health sciences PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Health Sciences (JRHS) is the official journal of the School of Public Health; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, which is published quarterly. Since 2017, JRHS is published electronically. JRHS is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication which is produced quarterly and is a multidisciplinary journal in the field of public health, publishing contributions from Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Public Health, Occupational Health, Environmental Health, Health Education, and Preventive and Social Medicine. We do not publish clinical trials, nursing studies, animal studies, qualitative studies, nutritional studies, health insurance, and hospital management. In addition, we do not publish the results of laboratory and chemical studies in the field of ergonomics, occupational health, and environmental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信