Validity and feasibility of remote measurement systems for functional movement and posture assessments in people with axial spondylarthritis

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Erin Hannink, Maedeh Mansoubi, Neil Cronin, Benjamin Wilkins, Ali A. Najafi, Benjamin Waller, Helen Dawes
{"title":"Validity and feasibility of remote measurement systems for functional movement and posture assessments in people with axial spondylarthritis","authors":"Erin Hannink,&nbsp;Maedeh Mansoubi,&nbsp;Neil Cronin,&nbsp;Benjamin Wilkins,&nbsp;Ali A. Najafi,&nbsp;Benjamin Waller,&nbsp;Helen Dawes","doi":"10.1049/htl2.12038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Introduction: This study aimed to estimate the criterion validity of functional movement and posture measurement using remote technology systems in people with and without Axial spondylarthritis (axSpA).</p><p>Methods: Validity and agreement of the remote-technology measurement of functional movement and posture were tested cross-sectionally and compared to a standard clinical measurement by a physiotherapist. The feasibility of remote implementation was tested in a home environment. There were two cohorts of participants: people with axSpA and people without longstanding back pain. In addition, a cost-consequence analysis was performed.</p><p>Results: Sixty-two participants (31 with axSPA, 53% female, age = 45(SD14), BMI = 26.6(SD4.6) completed the study. In the axSpA group, cervical rotation, lumbar flexion, lumbar side flexion, shoulder flexion, hip abduction, tragus-to-wall and thoracic kyphosis showed a significant moderate to strong correlation; in the non-back pain group, the same measures showed significant correlation ranging from weak to strong.</p><p>Conclusions: Although not valid for clinical use in its current form, the remote technologies demonstrated moderate to strong correlation and agreement in most functional and postural tests measured in people with AxSA. Testing the CV-aided system in a home environment suggests it is a safe and feasible method. Yet, validity testing in this environment still needs to be performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":37474,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Technology Letters","volume":"9 6","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Technology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/htl2.12038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to estimate the criterion validity of functional movement and posture measurement using remote technology systems in people with and without Axial spondylarthritis (axSpA).

Methods: Validity and agreement of the remote-technology measurement of functional movement and posture were tested cross-sectionally and compared to a standard clinical measurement by a physiotherapist. The feasibility of remote implementation was tested in a home environment. There were two cohorts of participants: people with axSpA and people without longstanding back pain. In addition, a cost-consequence analysis was performed.

Results: Sixty-two participants (31 with axSPA, 53% female, age = 45(SD14), BMI = 26.6(SD4.6) completed the study. In the axSpA group, cervical rotation, lumbar flexion, lumbar side flexion, shoulder flexion, hip abduction, tragus-to-wall and thoracic kyphosis showed a significant moderate to strong correlation; in the non-back pain group, the same measures showed significant correlation ranging from weak to strong.

Conclusions: Although not valid for clinical use in its current form, the remote technologies demonstrated moderate to strong correlation and agreement in most functional and postural tests measured in people with AxSA. Testing the CV-aided system in a home environment suggests it is a safe and feasible method. Yet, validity testing in this environment still needs to be performed.

Abstract Image

轴型脊柱炎患者功能运动和姿势评估的远程测量系统的有效性和可行性
简介:本研究旨在评估在患有和不患有轴型脊柱炎(axSpA)的人群中使用远程技术系统进行功能运动和姿势测量的标准有效性。方法:对远程技术测量功能运动和姿势的有效性和一致性进行横断面测试,并与物理治疗师的标准临床测量进行比较。在家庭环境中测试了远程实现的可行性。有两组参与者:患有axSpA的人和没有长期背痛的人。此外,还进行了成本-后果分析。结果:62名参与者(31名患有axSPA, 53%为女性,年龄= 45(SD14), BMI = 26.6(SD4.6))完成了研究。在axSpA组中,颈椎旋转、腰椎屈曲、腰侧屈曲、肩部屈曲、髋外展、耳屏对壁和胸椎后凸呈显著的中至强相关性;在非背痛组中,同样的测量结果显示出从弱到强的显著相关性。结论:尽管目前形式的远程技术在临床应用中无效,但在大多数AxSA患者的功能和体位测试中,远程技术显示出中度到高度的相关性和一致性。在家庭环境中进行的测试表明,该系统是一种安全可行的方法。然而,仍然需要在此环境中执行有效性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Technology Letters
Healthcare Technology Letters Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
12
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Healthcare Technology Letters aims to bring together an audience of biomedical and electrical engineers, physical and computer scientists, and mathematicians to enable the exchange of the latest ideas and advances through rapid online publication of original healthcare technology research. Major themes of the journal include (but are not limited to): Major technological/methodological areas: Biomedical signal processing Biomedical imaging and image processing Bioinstrumentation (sensors, wearable technologies, etc) Biomedical informatics Major application areas: Cardiovascular and respiratory systems engineering Neural engineering, neuromuscular systems Rehabilitation engineering Bio-robotics, surgical planning and biomechanics Therapeutic and diagnostic systems, devices and technologies Clinical engineering Healthcare information systems, telemedicine, mHealth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信