Congruency of color-sound crossmodal correspondence interacts with color and sound discrimination depending on color category.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Kenta Miyamoto, Yuma Taniyama, Kyoko Hine, Shigeki Nakauchi
{"title":"Congruency of color-sound crossmodal correspondence interacts with color and sound discrimination depending on color category.","authors":"Kenta Miyamoto,&nbsp;Yuma Taniyama,&nbsp;Kyoko Hine,&nbsp;Shigeki Nakauchi","doi":"10.1177/20416695231196835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People occasionally associate color (e.g., hue) with sound (e.g., pitch). Previous studies have reported color-sound associations, which are examples of crossmodal correspondences. However, the association between both semantic and perceptual factors with color/sound discrimination in crossmodal correspondence remains unclear. To clarify this, three psychological experiments were conducted, where Stroop tasks were used to assess automatic process on the association. We focused on the crossmodal correspondence between color (Experiment 1)/color word (Experiment 2) and sound. Participants discriminated the color/word or the sound presented simultaneously. The results showed the color-sound bidirectional enhancement/interference of the response by certain associations of the crossmodal correspondence (blue-drop and yellow-shiny) in both experiments. These results suggest that these Stroop effects were caused by the semantic factor (color category) and the perceptual factor (color appearance) was not necessary for the current results. In Experiment 3, response modulation by color labeling was investigated to clarify the influence of subjective labeling. Participants labeled a presented ambiguous color, which was a hue specification between two specific colors, by listening to the sound. The results revealed that the Stroop effect was caused only when the presented color was classified as the color related to the presented sound. This showed that subjective labeling played a role in the regulation of the effect of crossmodal correspondences. These findings should contribute to the explanation of crossmodal correspondences through semantic mediation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695231196835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People occasionally associate color (e.g., hue) with sound (e.g., pitch). Previous studies have reported color-sound associations, which are examples of crossmodal correspondences. However, the association between both semantic and perceptual factors with color/sound discrimination in crossmodal correspondence remains unclear. To clarify this, three psychological experiments were conducted, where Stroop tasks were used to assess automatic process on the association. We focused on the crossmodal correspondence between color (Experiment 1)/color word (Experiment 2) and sound. Participants discriminated the color/word or the sound presented simultaneously. The results showed the color-sound bidirectional enhancement/interference of the response by certain associations of the crossmodal correspondence (blue-drop and yellow-shiny) in both experiments. These results suggest that these Stroop effects were caused by the semantic factor (color category) and the perceptual factor (color appearance) was not necessary for the current results. In Experiment 3, response modulation by color labeling was investigated to clarify the influence of subjective labeling. Participants labeled a presented ambiguous color, which was a hue specification between two specific colors, by listening to the sound. The results revealed that the Stroop effect was caused only when the presented color was classified as the color related to the presented sound. This showed that subjective labeling played a role in the regulation of the effect of crossmodal correspondences. These findings should contribute to the explanation of crossmodal correspondences through semantic mediation.

色-声跨模对应的一致性与颜色和声音根据颜色类别的区分相互作用。
人们偶尔会把颜色(如色调)和声音(如音高)联系起来。先前的研究报告了颜色和声音的关联,这是跨模式对应的例子。然而,语义和知觉因素与跨模式通信中颜色/声音辨别之间的关系尚不清楚。为了澄清这一点,进行了三个心理学实验,其中使用Stroop任务来评估联想的自动过程。我们重点研究了颜色(实验1)/颜色单词(实验2)与声音之间的交叉模态对应关系。参与者区分同时呈现的颜色/单词或声音。结果表明,在两种实验中,色-声双向增强/干扰响应都是由交叉模态对应的某些关联(蓝滴和黄闪)引起的。这些结果表明,这些Stroop效应是由语义因素(颜色类别)引起的,而感知因素(颜色外观)对当前结果不是必需的。实验3研究颜色标记对反应的调节作用,以阐明主观标记对反应的影响。参与者通过听声音来标记呈现的模糊颜色,这是两种特定颜色之间的色调规范。结果表明,只有当呈现的颜色被归类为与呈现的声音相关的颜色时,才会产生Stroop效应。这表明主观标记在调节跨模式对应效应中起作用。这些发现有助于通过语义中介解释跨模态对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信