Validation of a shape-optimized 2-unit cantilevered inlay-retained fiber-reinforced resin-bonded dental prosthesis

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Validation of a shape-optimized 2-unit cantilevered inlay-retained fiber-reinforced resin-bonded dental prosthesis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div><span>Current designs of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) have a limited lifespan, failing mainly through veneer-fiber </span>delamination, debonding, and fracture.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to validate a new inlay-retained 2-unit cantilevered RBFDP with an optimized cavity and fiber layout proposed in a previous study by using simulated occlusal loading.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div><span><span>Two groups of specimens (n=20), 1 with and 1 without glass fibers<span><span>, were used to test the influence of the cavity design and that of the fiber layout on their load capacity, respectively. The specimens without fibers were directly cut from a resin-ceramic block by using a computer-aided manufacturing system, while those with fibers were manually fabricated with unidirectional glass fibers and </span>composite resin in a </span></span>silicone<span> mold. The specimens with and without fibers were attached to abutments made of the same resin-ceramic with a cyanoacrylate-based adhesive and a resin-based </span></span>dental cement<span><span>, respectively. An increasing compressive load was applied on the mesial fossa<span> of the premolar pontic until failure. Cracking in the specimens during loading was monitored with a 2-channel </span></span>acoustic emission (AE) system.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>All the specimens without fiber reinforcement debonded from the abutments. Those using the optimized shovel-shaped cavity design had a mean ±standard deviation failure load (50.0 ±17.3 N) that was 193% higher than that of those with the conventional step-box design (17.1 ±6.2 N; </span><em>P</em>&lt;.001). No significant difference was found between the groups for the mean number of AE events per specimen (step-box: 49 ±34 versus shovel-shaped: 63 ±34; <em>P</em>=.427), the mean amplitude of each event (58.4 ±1.3 dB versus 59.5 ±2.4 dB; <em>P</em><span>=.299), or the mean time to failure (283.2 ±122.3 seconds versus 297.5 ±66.7 seconds; </span><em>P</em>=.798). Between the groups of specimens with reinforcing fibers, the mean failure load of the conventional design was approximately half that of the optimized one. Again, no significant difference was found for the mean number of AE events per specimen (conventional: 28 ±18 versus optimized: 52 ±53; <em>P</em>=.248) or the mean amplitude for each AE event (64.9 ±4.2 dB versus 61.7 ±5.2 dB; <em>P</em>=.187). The connectors of 8 fiber-reinforced specimens with the conventional design fractured; the other 2 debonded from the abutments. Half of the shape-optimized fiber-reinforced specimens had fractured abutments, but the cantilevers remained intact, 4 specimens fractured at the connector, and only 1 debonded from its abutment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The shape-optimized 2-unit cantilevered FRC RBFDP had a higher load capacity than the conventional design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391322004279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

Current designs of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) have a limited lifespan, failing mainly through veneer-fiber delamination, debonding, and fracture.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to validate a new inlay-retained 2-unit cantilevered RBFDP with an optimized cavity and fiber layout proposed in a previous study by using simulated occlusal loading.

Material and methods

Two groups of specimens (n=20), 1 with and 1 without glass fibers, were used to test the influence of the cavity design and that of the fiber layout on their load capacity, respectively. The specimens without fibers were directly cut from a resin-ceramic block by using a computer-aided manufacturing system, while those with fibers were manually fabricated with unidirectional glass fibers and composite resin in a silicone mold. The specimens with and without fibers were attached to abutments made of the same resin-ceramic with a cyanoacrylate-based adhesive and a resin-based dental cement, respectively. An increasing compressive load was applied on the mesial fossa of the premolar pontic until failure. Cracking in the specimens during loading was monitored with a 2-channel acoustic emission (AE) system.

Results

All the specimens without fiber reinforcement debonded from the abutments. Those using the optimized shovel-shaped cavity design had a mean ±standard deviation failure load (50.0 ±17.3 N) that was 193% higher than that of those with the conventional step-box design (17.1 ±6.2 N; P<.001). No significant difference was found between the groups for the mean number of AE events per specimen (step-box: 49 ±34 versus shovel-shaped: 63 ±34; P=.427), the mean amplitude of each event (58.4 ±1.3 dB versus 59.5 ±2.4 dB; P=.299), or the mean time to failure (283.2 ±122.3 seconds versus 297.5 ±66.7 seconds; P=.798). Between the groups of specimens with reinforcing fibers, the mean failure load of the conventional design was approximately half that of the optimized one. Again, no significant difference was found for the mean number of AE events per specimen (conventional: 28 ±18 versus optimized: 52 ±53; P=.248) or the mean amplitude for each AE event (64.9 ±4.2 dB versus 61.7 ±5.2 dB; P=.187). The connectors of 8 fiber-reinforced specimens with the conventional design fractured; the other 2 debonded from the abutments. Half of the shape-optimized fiber-reinforced specimens had fractured abutments, but the cantilevers remained intact, 4 specimens fractured at the connector, and only 1 debonded from its abutment.

Conclusions

The shape-optimized 2-unit cantilevered FRC RBFDP had a higher load capacity than the conventional design.
验证形状优化的双单元悬臂嵌体纤维增强树脂粘结义齿。
问题陈述:纤维增强复合材料(FRC)树脂粘结固定义齿(RBFDP)的现有设计寿命有限,主要通过贴面-纤维分层、脱粘和断裂而失效:使用两组试样(n=20),一组含玻璃纤维,另一组不含玻璃纤维,分别测试空腔设计和纤维布局对其承载能力的影响。不含纤维的试样是通过计算机辅助制造系统直接从树脂陶瓷块上切割下来的,而含纤维的试样则是用单向玻璃纤维和复合树脂在硅胶模具中手工制造的。有纤维和无纤维的试样分别用氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂和树脂牙科粘结剂粘接在由相同树脂陶瓷制成的基台上。在前臼齿基台的中窝处施加越来越大的压缩负荷,直至失效。使用双通道声发射(AE)系统监测加载过程中试样的裂纹情况:结果:所有未使用纤维加固的试样都与基台脱开。采用优化铲形空腔设计的试样的平均±标准偏差破坏荷载(50.0 ±17.3 N)比采用传统阶梯箱设计的试样(17.1 ±6.2 N;PC结论)高出193%:形状优化的 2 单元悬臂式 FRC RBFDP 的承载能力高于传统设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信