Antiplatelet Therapy and Bleeding Outcomes With CYP2C19 Genotyping.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
James C Coons, James M Stevenson, Ami Patel, A J Conrad Smith, Linda Prebehalla, Philip E Empey
{"title":"Antiplatelet Therapy and Bleeding Outcomes With CYP2C19 Genotyping.","authors":"James C Coons,&nbsp;James M Stevenson,&nbsp;Ami Patel,&nbsp;A J Conrad Smith,&nbsp;Linda Prebehalla,&nbsp;Philip E Empey","doi":"10.1177/10742484221143246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of antiplatelet therapy with availability of CYP2C19 genotyping on bleeding in a real-world setting has not been extensively studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, single-center, cohort study conducted between December 2015 and October 2019 with 1-year follow-up. Patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CYP2C19 genotyping, and received P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. The primary outcome was time to first bleed of any severity using Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Secondary outcomes included time to first major bleed and rates of antiplatelet switching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome occurred in 697 of 2091 (33%) participants at a median of 15 days. Major bleeding occurred in 176 (8%) of patients. Compared to clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.69-2.46). For patients without CYP2C19 no function alleles, treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.83-2.90). Similar associations were observed for major bleeding. No difference in ischemic events was observed. Among patients discharged on ticagrelor or prasugrel, 199 (36%) were de-escalated to clopidogrel within 1 year. De-escalation was more likely after a bleed if patients did not have a no function allele (35.9% vs 19.1%; <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bleeding is common in post-PCI patients on antiplatelet therapy. Patients on high potency agents had higher bleeding risk in the population at-large and in non-carriers of CYP2C19 no function alleles. Genotype-guided antiplatelet de-escalation should be further explored in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484221143246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of antiplatelet therapy with availability of CYP2C19 genotyping on bleeding in a real-world setting has not been extensively studied.

Methods: Prospective, single-center, cohort study conducted between December 2015 and October 2019 with 1-year follow-up. Patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CYP2C19 genotyping, and received P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. The primary outcome was time to first bleed of any severity using Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Secondary outcomes included time to first major bleed and rates of antiplatelet switching.

Results: The primary outcome occurred in 697 of 2091 (33%) participants at a median of 15 days. Major bleeding occurred in 176 (8%) of patients. Compared to clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.69-2.46). For patients without CYP2C19 no function alleles, treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.83-2.90). Similar associations were observed for major bleeding. No difference in ischemic events was observed. Among patients discharged on ticagrelor or prasugrel, 199 (36%) were de-escalated to clopidogrel within 1 year. De-escalation was more likely after a bleed if patients did not have a no function allele (35.9% vs 19.1%; P = .02).

Conclusion: Bleeding is common in post-PCI patients on antiplatelet therapy. Patients on high potency agents had higher bleeding risk in the population at-large and in non-carriers of CYP2C19 no function alleles. Genotype-guided antiplatelet de-escalation should be further explored in prospective studies.

CYP2C19基因分型的抗血小板治疗和出血结局。
目的:抗血小板治疗和CYP2C19基因分型对现实世界出血的影响尚未得到广泛研究。方法:2015年12月至2019年10月进行前瞻性、单中心、队列研究,随访1年。患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI), CYP2C19基因分型,并接受P2Y12抑制剂治疗。根据出血学术研究协会的标准,主要结局是首次出血的时间。次要结局包括第一次大出血的时间和抗血小板转换率。结果:主要结局发生在2091名参与者中的697名(33%),中位时间为15天。176例(8%)患者发生大出血。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞或普拉格雷治疗与出血风险增加相关(调整HR [aHR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.69-2.46)。对于没有CYP2C19无功能等位基因的患者,接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗与出血风险增加相关(aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.83-2.90)。大出血也有类似的关联。缺血事件未见差异。在替格瑞或普拉格雷出院的患者中,199例(36%)在1年内降级为氯吡格雷。如果患者没有无功能等位基因,出血后降级的可能性更大(35.9% vs 19.1%;P = .02)。结论:pci术后接受抗血小板治疗的患者出血较为常见。在一般人群和非CYP2C19无功能等位基因携带者中,使用高效药物的患者出血风险更高。基因型引导的抗血小板降级治疗应在前瞻性研究中进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信