Long-term Survival Rate Following Myocardial Infarction and the Effect of Discharge Medications on the Survival Rate.

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sahar Bayat, Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari, Yadollah Mehrabi, Mohammad Sistanizad
{"title":"Long-term Survival Rate Following Myocardial Infarction and the Effect of Discharge Medications on the Survival Rate.","authors":"Sahar Bayat,&nbsp;Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari,&nbsp;Yadollah Mehrabi,&nbsp;Mohammad Sistanizad","doi":"10.34172/jrhs.2022.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of the risk factors associated with the long-term survival rate of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and the effects of discharge medications can significantly help select the most effective strategies for improving treatment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants of this retrospective cohort study were 21,181 patients who suffered from MI and were hospitalized in the cardiac care unit (CCU) of different public, private, and military hospitals in Iran from 20 March 2013 to 20 March 2014. Participants were followed up until February 2020 for any cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. To evaluate survival rate, the differences between groups, and the factors related to MI death, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and Cox proportional-hazards model were used, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One, three, five, and seven-year survival rates of patients were 88%, 81%, 78%, and 74%, respectively. Regarding the interaction effect of prescribed medical drugs, the highest 7-year survival rate of 86% (95% CI: 72%, 93%) was related to people who consumed anticoagulants, aspirin, clopidogrel, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEs), and angiotensin II receptor antagonist simultaneously. Considering the effect of other variables, the consumption of anticoagulants was associated with a decrease in survival rate (HR=1.13 CI: 1.06, 1.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As evidenced by the results of this study, different combinations of prescribed medication drugs had protective effects on long-term mortality compared to the group without any drug. Nonetheless, according to the drugs in each combination therapy, this protective effect ranged from HR=0.27 to HR=0.89. It is recommended that further studies compare the long-term effects of different drug combinations and also consider adherence to treatment in evaluating the effects of these combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in health sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.2022.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of the risk factors associated with the long-term survival rate of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and the effects of discharge medications can significantly help select the most effective strategies for improving treatment.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Methods: The participants of this retrospective cohort study were 21,181 patients who suffered from MI and were hospitalized in the cardiac care unit (CCU) of different public, private, and military hospitals in Iran from 20 March 2013 to 20 March 2014. Participants were followed up until February 2020 for any cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. To evaluate survival rate, the differences between groups, and the factors related to MI death, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and Cox proportional-hazards model were used, respectively.

Results: One, three, five, and seven-year survival rates of patients were 88%, 81%, 78%, and 74%, respectively. Regarding the interaction effect of prescribed medical drugs, the highest 7-year survival rate of 86% (95% CI: 72%, 93%) was related to people who consumed anticoagulants, aspirin, clopidogrel, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEs), and angiotensin II receptor antagonist simultaneously. Considering the effect of other variables, the consumption of anticoagulants was associated with a decrease in survival rate (HR=1.13 CI: 1.06, 1.19).

Conclusion: As evidenced by the results of this study, different combinations of prescribed medication drugs had protective effects on long-term mortality compared to the group without any drug. Nonetheless, according to the drugs in each combination therapy, this protective effect ranged from HR=0.27 to HR=0.89. It is recommended that further studies compare the long-term effects of different drug combinations and also consider adherence to treatment in evaluating the effects of these combinations.

心肌梗死后长期生存率及出院药物对生存率的影响。
背景:评价与心肌梗死(MI)患者长期生存率相关的危险因素及出院药物的效果,对选择最有效的改善治疗策略具有重要意义。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:本回顾性队列研究的参与者为2013年3月20日至2014年3月20日在伊朗不同公立、私立和军队医院心脏护理病房(CCU)住院的21181例心肌梗死患者。参与者随访至2020年2月,以了解任何心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率。分别采用Kaplan-Meier、log-rank检验和Cox比例风险模型评估生存率、组间差异和心肌梗死死亡相关因素。结果:1年、3年、5年、7年生存率分别为88%、81%、78%、74%。在处方药物相互作用方面,同时服用抗凝剂、阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶(ace)和血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂的患者7年生存率最高,为86% (95% CI: 72%, 93%)。考虑到其他变量的影响,抗凝血剂的使用与生存率降低相关(HR=1.13, CI: 1.06, 1.19)。结论:本研究结果表明,与未用药组相比,不同的处方药物组合对长期死亡率有保护作用。尽管如此,根据每种联合治疗的药物,这种保护作用的风险比从0.27到0.89不等。建议进一步的研究比较不同药物组合的长期效果,并在评估这些组合的效果时考虑坚持治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of research in health sciences
Journal of research in health sciences PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Health Sciences (JRHS) is the official journal of the School of Public Health; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, which is published quarterly. Since 2017, JRHS is published electronically. JRHS is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication which is produced quarterly and is a multidisciplinary journal in the field of public health, publishing contributions from Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Public Health, Occupational Health, Environmental Health, Health Education, and Preventive and Social Medicine. We do not publish clinical trials, nursing studies, animal studies, qualitative studies, nutritional studies, health insurance, and hospital management. In addition, we do not publish the results of laboratory and chemical studies in the field of ergonomics, occupational health, and environmental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信