Medicolegal Aspects of Victims of Assault Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka.

Q4 Medicine
Maleesa Sawaneeth Jayasundara, Yalini Thivaharan, Thanushan Muthulingam, Nirmal Borukgama, Deshan L Kulathunga, Indira D G Kitulwatte
{"title":"Medicolegal Aspects of Victims of Assault Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Maleesa Sawaneeth Jayasundara,&nbsp;Yalini Thivaharan,&nbsp;Thanushan Muthulingam,&nbsp;Nirmal Borukgama,&nbsp;Deshan L Kulathunga,&nbsp;Indira D G Kitulwatte","doi":"10.1177/19253621211065616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Violence with physical assault is a common cause of morbidity and mortality prevalent but not limited to underdeveloped countries. The opinion of the forensic expert is often indispensable in such cases to determine the penalties. This study was planned to describe the pattern of presentation of the victims and evaluate the strengths and limitations in formulating a scientific medicolegal opinion based on the findings of the victim.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study based on the case records of the victims of assault admitted to Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka, was conducted for four years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 400 victims, the majority (72% n = 290) were males and of the age-group of 21 to 40 (n = 216). The reason for assault in the majority was sudden provocation (n = 99, 25%), followed by previous long-duration enmity (n = 89, 22%). The majority (83%) had isolated blunt force trauma, and the injuries were nongrievous (74%). Defense injuries were significantly associated with attempted defense (p = 0.000) and sharp force trauma (p = 0.002). The underlying reason for the assault was not significantly associated with the causative weapon (p = 0.228) or body region injured (p = 0.195).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though the presentation and the pattern of injures are definitely of value in formulating a scientific opinion, the study identified the limitations of the forensic experts, and the need for a holistic approach at the investigations was highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":"12 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178999/pdf/10.1177_19253621211065616.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621211065616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Violence with physical assault is a common cause of morbidity and mortality prevalent but not limited to underdeveloped countries. The opinion of the forensic expert is often indispensable in such cases to determine the penalties. This study was planned to describe the pattern of presentation of the victims and evaluate the strengths and limitations in formulating a scientific medicolegal opinion based on the findings of the victim.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive study based on the case records of the victims of assault admitted to Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka, was conducted for four years.

Results: Out of the 400 victims, the majority (72% n = 290) were males and of the age-group of 21 to 40 (n = 216). The reason for assault in the majority was sudden provocation (n = 99, 25%), followed by previous long-duration enmity (n = 89, 22%). The majority (83%) had isolated blunt force trauma, and the injuries were nongrievous (74%). Defense injuries were significantly associated with attempted defense (p = 0.000) and sharp force trauma (p = 0.002). The underlying reason for the assault was not significantly associated with the causative weapon (p = 0.228) or body region injured (p = 0.195).

Conclusions: Even though the presentation and the pattern of injures are definitely of value in formulating a scientific opinion, the study identified the limitations of the forensic experts, and the need for a holistic approach at the investigations was highlighted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

斯里兰卡三级护理医院收治的袭击受害者的医学法律问题。
简介:暴力与身体攻击是发病率和死亡率普遍普遍的共同原因,但不限于不发达国家。在这类案件中,法医专家的意见往往是决定处罚必不可少的。计划进行这项研究是为了描述受害者的陈述模式,并评估在根据受害者的调查结果提出科学的医学法律意见方面的优势和局限性。方法:对斯里兰卡拉加马科伦坡北教学医院收治的性侵受害者的病例记录进行了为期四年的回顾性描述性研究。结果:在400名受害者中,大多数(72% n = 290)为男性,年龄在21至40岁之间(n = 216)。攻击的主要原因是突然挑衅(n = 99, 25%),其次是之前的长期敌意(n = 89, 22%)。大多数(83%)有孤立的钝器创伤,损伤是非致命性的(74%)。防卫伤与防卫未遂(p = 0.000)和锐器伤(p = 0.002)显著相关。攻击的潜在原因与致病武器(p = 0.228)或身体受伤区域(p = 0.195)没有显著相关性。结论:尽管损伤的呈现和模式在形成科学意见方面肯定是有价值的,但该研究确定了法医专家的局限性,并强调了在调查中采用整体方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信