Two Attitudes towards Textuality in International Law: The Battle for Dualism.

IF 1.4 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ojls/gqac010

Jean d'Aspremont

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article sketches out two distinct attitudes towards textuality in international law, namely international hermeneutics and international poetics. It argues that these two attitudes towards textuality espouse very different types of dualism of thought. This difference bears major implications on how the international lawyer approaches international legal texts. In exposing these two attitudes towards textuality and the distinct types of dualism they reveal, this article makes a plea for a greater embrace of international poetics by international lawyers, and thus for a complete remoulding of international lawyers' dualist patterns of thought.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对国际法文本性的两种态度:二元论之争。

本文概述了国际法文本性的两种截然不同的态度，即国际解释学和国际诗学。本文认为，这两种对文本性的态度体现了截然不同的二元论思想。这种差异对国际律师如何处理国际法律文本具有重大影响。通过揭示这两种对文本性的态度及其所揭示的不同类型的二元论，本文呼吁国际法学家更大程度地接受国际诗学，从而彻底改造国际法学家的二元论思维模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies LAW-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Oxford Journal of Legal Studies is published on behalf of the Faculty of Law in the University of Oxford. It is designed to encourage interest in all matters relating to law, with an emphasis on matters of theory and on broad issues arising from the relationship of law to other disciplines. No topic of legal interest is excluded from consideration. In addition to traditional questions of legal interest, the following are all within the purview of the journal: comparative and international law, the law of the European Community, legal history and philosophy, and interdisciplinary material in areas of relevance.