A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Resistance Training on Quality of Life, Depression, Muscle Strength, and Functional Exercise Capacity in Older Adults Aged 60 Years or More.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sholeh Khodadad Kashi, Zahra Sadat Mirzazadeh, Vahid Saatchian
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Resistance Training on Quality of Life, Depression, Muscle Strength, and Functional Exercise Capacity in Older Adults Aged 60 Years or More.","authors":"Sholeh Khodadad Kashi,&nbsp;Zahra Sadat Mirzazadeh,&nbsp;Vahid Saatchian","doi":"10.1177/10998004221120945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aging is generally associated with numerous metabolic and physical changes that augment susceptibility to several chronic conditions, disability, and diminished quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of resistance training on quality of life, depression, muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity in older adults (≥60 years).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to December 20, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies (<i>N</i> = 1610) were included. Resistance training significantly improved physical functioning (standard mean differences (SMD), 0.31; <i>p =</i> 0.02), mental health (SMD, 0.44; <i>p =</i> 0.001), bodily pain (SMD, -0.52; <i>p =</i> 0.004), general health (SMD, 0.43; <i>p =</i> 0.002), social functioning (SMD, 0.25; <i>p =</i> 0.006), and mental component score (SMD, 0.51; <i>p =</i> 0.001) subscales. Moreover, depression (SMD, -1.13; <i>p =</i> 0.01), upper-limb muscle strength (mean difference (MD), 15.26 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.002), lower-limb muscle strength (MD, 48.46 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.02), and handgrip muscle strength (MD, 1.35 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.003) significantly improved following resistance training. No benefits were found for vitality, physical component score, total score of quality of life, and the 6-min walk distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence reveals that resistance training can be effective for improving most domains of quality of life, upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, handgrip strength, and depression in aged people. More proof is hence needed to draw solid conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221120945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Aging is generally associated with numerous metabolic and physical changes that augment susceptibility to several chronic conditions, disability, and diminished quality of life.

Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of resistance training on quality of life, depression, muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity in older adults (≥60 years).

Data sources: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to December 20, 2021.

Results: 21 studies (N = 1610) were included. Resistance training significantly improved physical functioning (standard mean differences (SMD), 0.31; p = 0.02), mental health (SMD, 0.44; p = 0.001), bodily pain (SMD, -0.52; p = 0.004), general health (SMD, 0.43; p = 0.002), social functioning (SMD, 0.25; p = 0.006), and mental component score (SMD, 0.51; p = 0.001) subscales. Moreover, depression (SMD, -1.13; p = 0.01), upper-limb muscle strength (mean difference (MD), 15.26 kg; p = 0.002), lower-limb muscle strength (MD, 48.46 kg; p = 0.02), and handgrip muscle strength (MD, 1.35 kg; p = 0.003) significantly improved following resistance training. No benefits were found for vitality, physical component score, total score of quality of life, and the 6-min walk distance.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence reveals that resistance training can be effective for improving most domains of quality of life, upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, handgrip strength, and depression in aged people. More proof is hence needed to draw solid conclusions.

抗阻训练对60岁及以上老年人生活质量、抑郁、肌肉力量和功能性运动能力的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:衰老通常与许多代谢和身体变化有关,这些变化增加了对几种慢性疾病、残疾和生活质量下降的易感性。目的:本荟萃分析的目的是调查阻力训练对老年人(≥60岁)生活质量、抑郁、肌肉力量和功能运动能力的影响。数据来源:系统检索PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar和Scopus,截止到2021年12月20日。结果:共纳入21项研究(N = 1610)。抗阻训练显著改善身体机能(标准平均差异(SMD), 0.31;p = 0.02)、心理健康(SMD, 0.44;p = 0.001),身体疼痛(SMD, -0.52;p = 0.004),一般健康(SMD, 0.43;p = 0.002),社会功能(SMD, 0.25;p = 0.006),心理成分评分(SMD, 0.51;P = 0.001)。抑郁(SMD, -1.13;p = 0.01)、上肢肌力(MD)(平均差值15.26 kg;p = 0.002),下肢肌力(MD, 48.46 kg;p = 0.02),握力(MD, 1.35 kg;P = 0.003)阻力训练后显著改善。在活力、身体成分评分、生活质量总分和6分钟步行距离方面没有发现任何益处。结论:初步证据表明,阻力训练可以有效改善老年人的生活质量、上肢和下肢肌肉力量、握力和抑郁。因此,需要更多的证据来得出可靠的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信