Reliable Detection of Eczema Areas for Fully Automated Assessment of Eczema Severity from Digital Camera Images

Rahman Attar , Guillem Hurault , Zihao Wang , Ricardo Mokhtari , Kevin Pan , Bayanne Olabi , Eleanor Earp , Lloyd Steele , Hywel C. Williams , Reiko J. Tanaka
{"title":"Reliable Detection of Eczema Areas for Fully Automated Assessment of Eczema Severity from Digital Camera Images","authors":"Rahman Attar ,&nbsp;Guillem Hurault ,&nbsp;Zihao Wang ,&nbsp;Ricardo Mokhtari ,&nbsp;Kevin Pan ,&nbsp;Bayanne Olabi ,&nbsp;Eleanor Earp ,&nbsp;Lloyd Steele ,&nbsp;Hywel C. Williams ,&nbsp;Reiko J. Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2023.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing the severity of eczema in clinical research requires face-to-face skin examination by trained staff. Such approaches are resource-intensive for participants and staff, challenging during pandemics, and prone to inter- and intra-observer variation. Computer vision algorithms have been proposed to automate the assessment of eczema severity using digital camera images. However, they often require human intervention to detect eczema lesions and cannot automatically assess eczema severity from real-world images in an end-to-end pipeline. We developed a model to detect eczema lesions from images using data augmentation and pixel-level segmentation of eczema lesions on 1,345 images provided by dermatologists. We evaluated the quality of the obtained segmentation compared with that of the clinicians, the robustness to varying imaging conditions encountered in real-life images, such as lighting, focus, and blur, and the performance of downstream severity prediction when using the detected eczema lesions. The quality and robustness of eczema lesion detection increased by approximately 25% and 40%, respectively, compared with that of our previous eczema detection model. The performance of the downstream severity prediction remained unchanged. Use of skin segmentation as an alternative to eczema segmentation that requires specialist labeling showed the performance on par with when eczema segmentation is used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"3 5","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/9d/main.PMC10504536.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026723000371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the severity of eczema in clinical research requires face-to-face skin examination by trained staff. Such approaches are resource-intensive for participants and staff, challenging during pandemics, and prone to inter- and intra-observer variation. Computer vision algorithms have been proposed to automate the assessment of eczema severity using digital camera images. However, they often require human intervention to detect eczema lesions and cannot automatically assess eczema severity from real-world images in an end-to-end pipeline. We developed a model to detect eczema lesions from images using data augmentation and pixel-level segmentation of eczema lesions on 1,345 images provided by dermatologists. We evaluated the quality of the obtained segmentation compared with that of the clinicians, the robustness to varying imaging conditions encountered in real-life images, such as lighting, focus, and blur, and the performance of downstream severity prediction when using the detected eczema lesions. The quality and robustness of eczema lesion detection increased by approximately 25% and 40%, respectively, compared with that of our previous eczema detection model. The performance of the downstream severity prediction remained unchanged. Use of skin segmentation as an alternative to eczema segmentation that requires specialist labeling showed the performance on par with when eczema segmentation is used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

湿疹区域的可靠检测,用于从数码相机图像中全自动评估湿疹严重程度。
在临床研究中评估湿疹的严重程度需要经过培训的工作人员进行面对面的皮肤检查。这种方法对参与者和工作人员来说是资源密集型的,在流行病期间具有挑战性,并且容易出现观察者之间和观察者内部的差异。已经提出了计算机视觉算法来使用数码相机图像自动评估湿疹的严重程度。然而,它们通常需要人工干预来检测湿疹病变,并且不能通过端到端的管道从真实世界的图像中自动评估湿疹的严重程度。我们开发了一个模型,通过对皮肤科医生提供的1345张图像进行数据增强和湿疹病变的像素级分割,从图像中检测湿疹病变。我们评估了与临床医生相比获得的分割质量,对真实图像中遇到的各种成像条件(如照明、聚焦和模糊)的鲁棒性,以及使用检测到的湿疹病变时下游严重程度预测的性能。与我们以前的湿疹检测模型相比,湿疹病变检测的质量和稳健性分别提高了约25%和40%。下游严重程度预测的性能保持不变。使用皮肤分割作为需要专家标记的湿疹分割的替代品,显示出与使用湿疹分割时相同的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信