{"title":"Rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine cytological smears and tissue sections by peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in-situ hybridization","authors":"Rabyia Javed , Deepti Narang , Kuldip Gupta , Sidartha Deshmukh , Mudit Chandra","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bovine tuberculosis is the leading cause of death in cattle and other species worldwide. Quick and precise identification of mycobacteria is critical to control the occurrence of tuberculosis in cattle.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed a fluorescent peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) approach to detect <em>Mycobacterium bovis</em> and <em>Mycobacterium avium</em> in cytological smears and tissue sections of bovines suspected of having tuberculosis. PNA-FISH was conducted on smears of lung and lymph node tissues. Standard bovine mycobacterial cultures were used to standardize the probes using 50 % formamide for <em>M. bovis</em> and 30 % formamide for <em>M. avium</em>. <em>M. bovis</em> probe (MTBCcy3), which was standardized at hybridization conditions of (55 °C and 40 % formamide) concentrations, was positive in all cytological smears.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four out of twenty five samples tested positive in tissue sections observed as a bright red fluorescence with a cy3 filter (MTBC probe). No results were observed with (MAV<sub>TAMRA</sub>) probe for <em>M. avium</em> which was standardized at hybridization conditions of (55 °C and 30 % formamide). No fluorescence was observed in the control tissue sections. Additionally, the results were juxtaposed with those of other commonly used detection methods such as immunohistochemistry and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by targeting the <em>esxA</em> gene. None of the samples tested positive for <em>M. avium</em> infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PNA-FISH can be used to obtain cytological impression smears and tissue sections. When compared to PCR it consumes less time in the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in post mortem cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242723000892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Bovine tuberculosis is the leading cause of death in cattle and other species worldwide. Quick and precise identification of mycobacteria is critical to control the occurrence of tuberculosis in cattle.
Methods
We developed a fluorescent peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) approach to detect Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium in cytological smears and tissue sections of bovines suspected of having tuberculosis. PNA-FISH was conducted on smears of lung and lymph node tissues. Standard bovine mycobacterial cultures were used to standardize the probes using 50 % formamide for M. bovis and 30 % formamide for M. avium. M. bovis probe (MTBCcy3), which was standardized at hybridization conditions of (55 °C and 40 % formamide) concentrations, was positive in all cytological smears.
Results
Four out of twenty five samples tested positive in tissue sections observed as a bright red fluorescence with a cy3 filter (MTBC probe). No results were observed with (MAVTAMRA) probe for M. avium which was standardized at hybridization conditions of (55 °C and 30 % formamide). No fluorescence was observed in the control tissue sections. Additionally, the results were juxtaposed with those of other commonly used detection methods such as immunohistochemistry and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by targeting the esxA gene. None of the samples tested positive for M. avium infection.
Conclusion
PNA-FISH can be used to obtain cytological impression smears and tissue sections. When compared to PCR it consumes less time in the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in post mortem cases.
期刊介绍:
The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease.
Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above.
The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.