21-gene expression assay and clinical outcomes of premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jaewon Hyung, Sae Byul Lee, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, BeomSeok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung-Ho Son, Hee Jin Lee, Gyungyub Gong, Hyehyun Jeong, Jae Ho Jeong, Jeong Eun Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim
{"title":"21-gene expression assay and clinical outcomes of premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer","authors":"Jaewon Hyung,&nbsp;Sae Byul Lee,&nbsp;Jisun Kim,&nbsp;Hee Jeong Kim,&nbsp;BeomSeok Ko,&nbsp;Jong Won Lee,&nbsp;Byung-Ho Son,&nbsp;Hee Jin Lee,&nbsp;Gyungyub Gong,&nbsp;Hyehyun Jeong,&nbsp;Jae Ho Jeong,&nbsp;Jeong Eun Kim,&nbsp;Jin-Hee Ahn,&nbsp;Kyung Hae Jung,&nbsp;Sung-Bae Kim","doi":"10.1002/ijc.34728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prognostic role of the recurrence score (RS) based on the 21-gene expression assay in premenopausal women is not well delineated, and we investigated the association of outcomes and the RS in premenopausal patients who had 21-gene expression assay at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between June 2005 and July 2018. Invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) by STEEP version 2.0 was compared according to the RS and clinical risk factors. A total of 554 patients were included in our study and 116 patients (20.9%) had age &lt;40 years, 238 patients (43.0%) had luminal B subtype (Ki67 ≥ 20%), and 83 patients (15.0%) had RS &gt;25. All patients received adjuvant tamoxifen ± chemotherapy. Overall, patients with RS &gt;25 showed trend toward worse IBCFS from multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.89 [95% CI: 0.95-3.73], <i>P</i> = .069). When comparing outcomes according to age and luminal subtypes, patients with luminal B subtype and age &lt;40 years (n = 60) showed significantly worse outcomes compared to the others (luminal A or luminal B + age ≥40 years, n = 494; adjusted HR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.49-5.82], log-rank <i>P</i> &lt; .001). Among patients with luminal B subtype and age &lt;40 years, there was no significant association observed between IBCFS and the RS (log-rank <i>P</i> = .51). In conclusion, while RS &gt;25 showed association with poor outcomes in premenopausal women, it may have less prognostic significance among those with luminal B subtype and age &lt;40 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"154 4","pages":"748-756"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.34728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prognostic role of the recurrence score (RS) based on the 21-gene expression assay in premenopausal women is not well delineated, and we investigated the association of outcomes and the RS in premenopausal patients who had 21-gene expression assay at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between June 2005 and July 2018. Invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) by STEEP version 2.0 was compared according to the RS and clinical risk factors. A total of 554 patients were included in our study and 116 patients (20.9%) had age <40 years, 238 patients (43.0%) had luminal B subtype (Ki67 ≥ 20%), and 83 patients (15.0%) had RS >25. All patients received adjuvant tamoxifen ± chemotherapy. Overall, patients with RS >25 showed trend toward worse IBCFS from multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.89 [95% CI: 0.95-3.73], P = .069). When comparing outcomes according to age and luminal subtypes, patients with luminal B subtype and age <40 years (n = 60) showed significantly worse outcomes compared to the others (luminal A or luminal B + age ≥40 years, n = 494; adjusted HR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.49-5.82], log-rank P < .001). Among patients with luminal B subtype and age <40 years, there was no significant association observed between IBCFS and the RS (log-rank P = .51). In conclusion, while RS >25 showed association with poor outcomes in premenopausal women, it may have less prognostic significance among those with luminal B subtype and age <40 years.

Abstract Image

21 基因表达检测与绝经前激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的临床预后
基于 21 基因表达检测的复发评分(RS)在绝经前女性中的预后作用尚未明确,我们研究了 2005 年 6 月至 2018 年 7 月期间在韩国首尔峨山医疗中心接受 21 基因表达检测的绝经前患者的预后与 RS 的关联。根据 RS 和临床风险因素,比较了 STEEP 2.0 版的无浸润性乳腺癌生存率(IBCFS)。研究共纳入554例患者,其中116例患者(20.9%)年龄为40岁,238例患者(43.0%)为管腔B亚型(Ki67≥20%),83例患者(15.0%)RS为25。所有患者都接受了他莫昔芬辅助治疗和化疗。总体而言,通过多变量分析,RS >25患者的IBCFS呈恶化趋势(调整后HR为1.89 [95% CI:0.95-3.73],P = .069)。在根据年龄和管腔亚型比较预后时,管腔B亚型和年龄<40岁的患者(n = 60)与其他患者(管腔A或管腔B + 年龄≥40岁,n = 494;调整后HR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.49-5.82],对数秩P <.001)相比,预后明显更差。在管腔 B 亚型和年龄≥40 岁的患者中,未观察到 IBCFS 与 RS 之间有显著关联(log-rank P = .51)。总之,虽然RS >25与绝经前妇女的不良预后有关,但在管腔B亚型和年龄为40岁的妇女中,其预后意义可能较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信