The Effect of Dental Flossing Instructions and Technique on Interproximal Bleeding: A randomized control trial.

Q2 Dentistry
David H Basali, Isaac Hong, Matthew Finkleman, Irina F Dragan, Robert Gyurko, Nacive Guzin Uzel, Paul A Levi
{"title":"The Effect of Dental Flossing Instructions and Technique on Interproximal Bleeding: A randomized control trial.","authors":"David H Basali,&nbsp;Isaac Hong,&nbsp;Matthew Finkleman,&nbsp;Irina F Dragan,&nbsp;Robert Gyurko,&nbsp;Nacive Guzin Uzel,&nbsp;Paul A Levi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Dental floss has been promoted reduce the effects from interdental microbial biofilm, however its efficacy has been questioned in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare daily flossing instructions using an adapted horizontal vertical flossing technique (AHVFT) and routine oral hygiene on gingival inflammation as indicated by bleeding on probing (BoP).<b>Methods</b> This randomized single-blinded controlled clinical trial was conducted with non-smoking adults presenting with gingivitis and no other systemic diseases. Eligible participants were recruited from a dental school patient population and were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group A (experimental group) was instructed in how to use the AHVFT once daily and Group B (control group) was asked to continue with their regular oral hygiene practices. Clinical evaluations (interproximal BoP measurements) were performed by blinded, calibrated examiners at two, four, and eight-week intervals; the percentage of sites with interproximal BoP was recorded. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.<b>Results</b> A total of 36 eligible participants were enrolled in the study: Group A (n=18), Group B (n=18). The mean (±SD) percentage of interproximal sites with BoP was 26.3 (±4.7), 8.6 (±7.3), 7.2 (±5.2), and 7.9 (±5.8) for Group A at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks, respectively. The corresponding values for Group B were 25.8 (±9.9), 15.6 (±12.4), 12.3 (±12.2), and 18.0 (±13.1), respectively. The percentage of sites with BoP was significantly lower for Group A than for Group B (<i>p</i>=.015 at two weeks, <i>p</i>=.009 at four weeks, and <i>p</i><.001 at eight weeks). Within each group, the percentage of sites with BoP was significantly lower when compared with baseline (<i>p</i><.008). At the final visit, the percent reduction in BoP for Group A was 70% and 30% for Group B compared with baseline. Most (88.2%) of Group A participants demonstrated mastery of the AHVFT at eight weeks.<b>Conclusion</b> Participants who received Instruction with the daily use of the AHVFT were shown to have reductions in interproximal BoP as compared to participants who had not received instructions in the AHVFT. Positive gingival health outcomes with dental flossing may be technique sensitive.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"97 4","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Dental floss has been promoted reduce the effects from interdental microbial biofilm, however its efficacy has been questioned in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare daily flossing instructions using an adapted horizontal vertical flossing technique (AHVFT) and routine oral hygiene on gingival inflammation as indicated by bleeding on probing (BoP).Methods This randomized single-blinded controlled clinical trial was conducted with non-smoking adults presenting with gingivitis and no other systemic diseases. Eligible participants were recruited from a dental school patient population and were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group A (experimental group) was instructed in how to use the AHVFT once daily and Group B (control group) was asked to continue with their regular oral hygiene practices. Clinical evaluations (interproximal BoP measurements) were performed by blinded, calibrated examiners at two, four, and eight-week intervals; the percentage of sites with interproximal BoP was recorded. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.Results A total of 36 eligible participants were enrolled in the study: Group A (n=18), Group B (n=18). The mean (±SD) percentage of interproximal sites with BoP was 26.3 (±4.7), 8.6 (±7.3), 7.2 (±5.2), and 7.9 (±5.8) for Group A at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks, respectively. The corresponding values for Group B were 25.8 (±9.9), 15.6 (±12.4), 12.3 (±12.2), and 18.0 (±13.1), respectively. The percentage of sites with BoP was significantly lower for Group A than for Group B (p=.015 at two weeks, p=.009 at four weeks, and p<.001 at eight weeks). Within each group, the percentage of sites with BoP was significantly lower when compared with baseline (p<.008). At the final visit, the percent reduction in BoP for Group A was 70% and 30% for Group B compared with baseline. Most (88.2%) of Group A participants demonstrated mastery of the AHVFT at eight weeks.Conclusion Participants who received Instruction with the daily use of the AHVFT were shown to have reductions in interproximal BoP as compared to participants who had not received instructions in the AHVFT. Positive gingival health outcomes with dental flossing may be technique sensitive.

牙线使用说明和技术对近端出血的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的牙线在减少牙间微生物生物膜对口腔的影响方面得到了广泛的推广,但其有效性一直受到文献的质疑。本研究的目的是比较使用水平垂直牙线技术(AHVFT)和常规口腔卫生的日常牙线指导对牙龈炎症的影响,如探探出血(BoP)。方法采用随机、单盲、对照临床试验,研究对象为无其他全身性疾病的非吸烟成人。符合条件的参与者从牙科学校的患者人群中招募,并随机分配到两组中的一组。A组(实验组)被告知如何每天使用一次AHVFT, B组(对照组)被要求继续他们的常规口腔卫生习惯。临床评估(近端间BoP测量)由盲法校准的检查者在2周、4周和8周间隔进行;记录近端间BoP部位的百分比。采用描述性统计和推断性统计对数据进行分析。结果共有36名符合条件的受试者入组:A组(n=18), B组(n=18)。在基线、2周、4周和8周时,A组近端间BoP的平均(±SD)百分比分别为26.3(±4.7)、8.6(±7.3)、7.2(±5.2)和7.9(±5.8)。B组相应值分别为25.8(±9.9)、15.6(±12.4)、12.3(±12.2)、18.0(±13.1)。A组出现BoP的部位比例显著低于B组(p=。2周时,p=。与没有接受AHVFT指导的参与者相比,接受每日使用AHVFT指导的参与者显示近端间BoP减少。积极的牙龈健康结果与牙线可能是技术敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信