Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el control lipídico de pacientes que inician inhibidores de la PCSK9

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jose Seijas-Amigo , Mónica Gayoso-Rey , María José Mauriz-Montero , Pedro Suarez-Artime , Antonia Casas-Martinez , María Dominguez-Guerra , Lara Gonzalez-Freire , Ana Estany-Gestal , Alberto Codero-Fort , Moisés Rodriguez-Mañero , Jose Ramón Gonzalez-Juanatey , e investigadores MEMOGAL
{"title":"Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el control lipídico de pacientes que inician inhibidores de la PCSK9","authors":"Jose Seijas-Amigo ,&nbsp;Mónica Gayoso-Rey ,&nbsp;María José Mauriz-Montero ,&nbsp;Pedro Suarez-Artime ,&nbsp;Antonia Casas-Martinez ,&nbsp;María Dominguez-Guerra ,&nbsp;Lara Gonzalez-Freire ,&nbsp;Ana Estany-Gestal ,&nbsp;Alberto Codero-Fort ,&nbsp;Moisés Rodriguez-Mañero ,&nbsp;Jose Ramón Gonzalez-Juanatey ,&nbsp;e investigadores MEMOGAL","doi":"10.1016/j.arteri.2022.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>MEMOGAL study (NCT04319081) is aimed at evaluating changes in cognitive function in patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i). This is the first analysis: (1) discussion about the role of the Hospital Pharmacists during the pandemic, and also the assessment of the impact of COVID-19 in the lipid control; (2) descriptive analysis; (3) effectiveness in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction of alirocumab and evolocumab; (4) communicate PCSK9i safety.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>It is a prospective Real-World Evidence analysis of patients that take PCSK9i for the first time in the usual clinical practice, and they are included after the first dispensation in the public pharmacy consultations of 12 Hospitals in Galicia from May 2020 to April 2021. Baseline values of LDL-c are the previous values before taking PCSK9 and the follow-up values are in 6 months time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>89 patients were included. 86.5% with cardiovascular disease and 53.9% with statin intolerances. 78.8% of the patients were treated with high intensity statins. Statins most used were rosuvastatin (34.1%) and atorvastatin (20.5%). Baseline value of LDL-c was 148<!--> <!-->mg/dL and the follow-up value was 71<!--> <!-->mg/dL. The baseline value of patients treated with alirocumab (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->43) was 144<!--> <!-->mg/dL and 73<!--> <!-->mg/dL in the follow-up. With evolocumab (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->46) was 151<!--> <!-->mg/dL in basaline and 69<!--> <!-->mg/dL in follow-up. The LDLc- reduction was 51.21% with evolocumab and 51.05% with alirocumab. 43.1% of the patients showed values &gt;70<!--> <!-->mg/dL in six month time; 19.4% between 69<!--> <!-->mg/dl and 55<!--> <!-->mg/dL and 37.5% &lt;55<!--> <!-->mg/dL. 58.3% of the patients achieved a reduction &gt;50% of LDL-c. The adverse events were: injection point reaction (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2), myalgias (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1), flu-like symptoms (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1) and neurocognitive worsening (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>(1) Despite the number of prescriptions was reduced because of the pandemic, the lipid control was not affected. (2) Half of the patients treated with PSCK9i is due to statins intolerance and the 86% is for secondary prevention. (2) The reduction results were similar to pivotal clinical trials. Despite this, 39% of the total of the patients and 60% of patients with dual teraphy did not reach the goal of ESC/EAS guidelines (&lt;<!--> <!-->55<!--> <!-->mg/dL and/or reduction<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->50%). There were not significant differences between evolocumab and alirocumab: 51.21% vs 51.05% (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.972). (3) There were not any adverse events of special interest. The possible neurocognitive worsening will be studied as the primary endpoint once the MEMOGAL study has been completed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45230,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810305/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214916822000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

MEMOGAL study (NCT04319081) is aimed at evaluating changes in cognitive function in patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i). This is the first analysis: (1) discussion about the role of the Hospital Pharmacists during the pandemic, and also the assessment of the impact of COVID-19 in the lipid control; (2) descriptive analysis; (3) effectiveness in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction of alirocumab and evolocumab; (4) communicate PCSK9i safety.

Material and methods

It is a prospective Real-World Evidence analysis of patients that take PCSK9i for the first time in the usual clinical practice, and they are included after the first dispensation in the public pharmacy consultations of 12 Hospitals in Galicia from May 2020 to April 2021. Baseline values of LDL-c are the previous values before taking PCSK9 and the follow-up values are in 6 months time.

Results

89 patients were included. 86.5% with cardiovascular disease and 53.9% with statin intolerances. 78.8% of the patients were treated with high intensity statins. Statins most used were rosuvastatin (34.1%) and atorvastatin (20.5%). Baseline value of LDL-c was 148 mg/dL and the follow-up value was 71 mg/dL. The baseline value of patients treated with alirocumab (N = 43) was 144 mg/dL and 73 mg/dL in the follow-up. With evolocumab (N = 46) was 151 mg/dL in basaline and 69 mg/dL in follow-up. The LDLc- reduction was 51.21% with evolocumab and 51.05% with alirocumab. 43.1% of the patients showed values >70 mg/dL in six month time; 19.4% between 69 mg/dl and 55 mg/dL and 37.5% <55 mg/dL. 58.3% of the patients achieved a reduction >50% of LDL-c. The adverse events were: injection point reaction (N = 2), myalgias (N = 1), flu-like symptoms (N = 1) and neurocognitive worsening (N = 1).

Conclusions

(1) Despite the number of prescriptions was reduced because of the pandemic, the lipid control was not affected. (2) Half of the patients treated with PSCK9i is due to statins intolerance and the 86% is for secondary prevention. (2) The reduction results were similar to pivotal clinical trials. Despite this, 39% of the total of the patients and 60% of patients with dual teraphy did not reach the goal of ESC/EAS guidelines (< 55 mg/dL and/or reduction > 50%). There were not significant differences between evolocumab and alirocumab: 51.21% vs 51.05% (P = .972). (3) There were not any adverse events of special interest. The possible neurocognitive worsening will be studied as the primary endpoint once the MEMOGAL study has been completed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行对启动PCSK9抑制剂患者脂质控制的影响
memogal研究(NCT04319081)旨在评估接受PCSK9抑制剂(PCSK9i)治疗的患者认知功能的变化。这是第一次分析:(1)讨论了医院药师在大流行期间的作用,并评估了COVID-19对血脂控制的影响;(2)描述性分析;(3) alirocumab和evolocumab降低LDL-c的有效性;(4)沟通PCSK9i安全。材料和方法本研究对在常规临床实践中首次服用PCSK9i的患者进行了前瞻性真实世界证据分析,这些患者在加利西亚12家医院的公共药房咨询中首次配药后被纳入。LDL-c基线值为服用PCSK9前的基线值,随访6个月后的基线值。结果共纳入89例患者。86.5%患有心血管疾病,53.9%患有他汀类药物不耐受。78.8%的患者接受高强度他汀类药物治疗。他汀类药物使用率最高的是瑞舒伐他汀(34.1%)和阿托伐他汀(20.5%)。LDL-c基线值为148 mg/dL,随访值为71 mg/dL。接受alirocumab治疗的患者(N = 43)的基线值在随访中分别为144mg /dL和73mg /dL。evolocumab组(N = 46)基线值为151 mg/dL,随访值为69 mg/dL。evolocumab组ldl -降低51.21%,alirocumab组降低51.05%。43.1%的患者6个月后血压值为70 mg/dL;19.4%介于69和55毫克/分升之间,37.5%介于55毫克/分升之间。58.3%的患者LDL-c降低了50%。不良事件为:注射点反应(N = 2)、肌痛(N = 1)、流感样症状(N = 1)和神经认知恶化(N = 1)。结论(1)大流行虽然减少了处方数量,但对血脂控制没有影响。(2)半数PSCK9i患者是由于他汀类药物不耐受,86%为二级预防。(2)还原结果与关键性临床试验相似。尽管如此,39%的患者和60%的双重治疗患者没有达到ESC/EAS指南的目标(<55毫克/分升和/或降低;50%)。evolocumab和alirocumab之间无显著差异:51.21% vs 51.05% (P = 0.972)。(3)未发生任何值得特别关注的不良事件。一旦MEMOGAL研究完成,可能的神经认知恶化将作为主要终点进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: La publicación idónea para acceder tanto a los últimos originales de investigación como a formación médica continuada sobre la arteriosclerosis y su etiología, epidemiología, fisiopatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Además, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信