Examining readiness for implementing practice changes in federally qualified health centers: A rapid qualitative study

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emanuelle M. Dias, Timothy J. Walker, Derek W. Craig, Robert Gibson, Jacob Szeszulski, Heather M. Brandt, Hiluv Johnson, Andrea Lamont, Abraham Wandersman, Maria E. Fernandez
{"title":"Examining readiness for implementing practice changes in federally qualified health centers: A rapid qualitative study","authors":"Emanuelle M. Dias, Timothy J. Walker, Derek W. Craig, Robert Gibson, Jacob Szeszulski, Heather M. Brandt, Hiluv Johnson, Andrea Lamont, Abraham Wandersman, Maria E. Fernandez","doi":"10.1002/jcop.23041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementing evidence-based interventions remains slow in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). The purpose of this study is to qualitatively examine the R = MC2 (Readiness = motivation × innovation specific capacity × general capacity) heuristic subcomponents in the context of implementing general and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS)-related practice changes in FQHCs. We conducted 17 interviews with FQHC employees to examine (1) experiences with successful or unsuccessful practice change efforts, (2) using approaches to promote CRCS, and (3) opinions about R = MC2 subcomponents. We conducted a rapid qualitative analysis to examine the frequency, depth, and spontaneity of subcomponents. Priority, compatibility, observability (motivation), intra- and interorganizational relationships (innovation-specific capacity), and organizational structure and resource utilization (general capacity) emerged as highly relevant. For example, organizational structure was described as related to an organization's open communication during meetings to help with scheduling procedures. The results contribute to understanding organizational readiness in the FQHC setting and can be helpful when identifying and prioritizing barriers and facilitators that affect implementation.","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcop.23041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.23041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementing evidence-based interventions remains slow in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). The purpose of this study is to qualitatively examine the R = MC2 (Readiness = motivation × innovation specific capacity × general capacity) heuristic subcomponents in the context of implementing general and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS)-related practice changes in FQHCs. We conducted 17 interviews with FQHC employees to examine (1) experiences with successful or unsuccessful practice change efforts, (2) using approaches to promote CRCS, and (3) opinions about R = MC2 subcomponents. We conducted a rapid qualitative analysis to examine the frequency, depth, and spontaneity of subcomponents. Priority, compatibility, observability (motivation), intra- and interorganizational relationships (innovation-specific capacity), and organizational structure and resource utilization (general capacity) emerged as highly relevant. For example, organizational structure was described as related to an organization's open communication during meetings to help with scheduling procedures. The results contribute to understanding organizational readiness in the FQHC setting and can be helpful when identifying and prioritizing barriers and facilitators that affect implementation.
检查是否准备好在具有联邦资格的卫生中心实施实践变革:一项快速定性研究。
在具有联邦资格的卫生中心实施循证干预措施仍然缓慢。本研究的目的是对R = MC2(准备 = 动机 × 特定创新能力 × 一般能力)启发式子组件在FQHC中实施一般和结直肠癌癌症筛查(CRCS)相关实践变化的背景下。我们对FQHC员工进行了17次访谈,以考察(1)成功或不成功的实践变革工作经验,(2)使用方法促进CRCS,以及(3)对R = MC2子组件。我们进行了快速定性分析,以检查子成分的频率、深度和自发性。优先级、兼容性、可观察性(动机)、组织内和组织间关系(创新特定能力)以及组织结构和资源利用率(一般能力)变得高度相关。例如,组织结构被描述为与组织在会议期间的公开沟通有关,以帮助安排程序。研究结果有助于理解FQHC环境中的组织准备情况,并有助于确定影响实施的障碍和促进者并确定其优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信