The predictive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in normotensive critically ill septic patients.

Timor Omar, Kamil İnci, Yusuf Oflu, Mustafa Dilek, Zeynep Binici Çelik, Soner Kına, Doğan İliş, Halil Murat Bucak
{"title":"The predictive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in normotensive critically ill septic patients.","authors":"Timor Omar,&nbsp;Kamil İnci,&nbsp;Yusuf Oflu,&nbsp;Mustafa Dilek,&nbsp;Zeynep Binici Çelik,&nbsp;Soner Kına,&nbsp;Doğan İliş,&nbsp;Halil Murat Bucak","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230378-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function using speckle tracking echocardiography is more sensitive than conventional echocardiographic measurement in detecting subtle left ventricular dysfunction in septic patients. Our purpose was to investigate the predictive significance of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in normotensive septic intensive care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, prospective cohort study included septic normotensive adults admitted to the intensive care unit between June 1, 2021, and August 31, 2021. Left ventricular systolic function was measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography within 24 hours of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-two patients were enrolled. The intensive care unit mortality rate was 27%. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain was less negative, which indicated worse left ventricular function in non-survivors than survivors (median [interquartile range], -15.2 [-17.2 - -12.5] versus -17.3 [-18.8 - -15.5]; p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for left ventricular global longitudinal strain was -17% in predicting intensive care unit mortality (area under the curve, 0.728). Patients with left ventricular global longitudinal strain > -17% (less negative than -17%, which indicated worse left ventricular function) showed a significantly higher mortality rate (39.2% versus 13.7%; p < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, left ventricular global longitudinal strain was an independent predictor of intensive care unit mortality [OR (95%CI), 1.326 (1.038 - 1.693); p = 0.024], along with invasive mechanical ventilation and Glasgow coma scale, APACHE II, and SOFA risk scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain is associated with mortality and provided predictive data in normotensive septic intensive care patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"35 2","pages":"187-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230378-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function using speckle tracking echocardiography is more sensitive than conventional echocardiographic measurement in detecting subtle left ventricular dysfunction in septic patients. Our purpose was to investigate the predictive significance of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in normotensive septic intensive care patients.

Methods: This observational, prospective cohort study included septic normotensive adults admitted to the intensive care unit between June 1, 2021, and August 31, 2021. Left ventricular systolic function was measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography within 24 hours of admission.

Results: One hundred fifty-two patients were enrolled. The intensive care unit mortality rate was 27%. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain was less negative, which indicated worse left ventricular function in non-survivors than survivors (median [interquartile range], -15.2 [-17.2 - -12.5] versus -17.3 [-18.8 - -15.5]; p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for left ventricular global longitudinal strain was -17% in predicting intensive care unit mortality (area under the curve, 0.728). Patients with left ventricular global longitudinal strain > -17% (less negative than -17%, which indicated worse left ventricular function) showed a significantly higher mortality rate (39.2% versus 13.7%; p < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, left ventricular global longitudinal strain was an independent predictor of intensive care unit mortality [OR (95%CI), 1.326 (1.038 - 1.693); p = 0.024], along with invasive mechanical ventilation and Glasgow coma scale, APACHE II, and SOFA risk scores.

Conclusion: Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain is associated with mortality and provided predictive data in normotensive septic intensive care patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

左心室整体纵向应变对血压正常的危重败血症患者的预测价值。
目的:斑点追踪超声心动图评价脓毒症患者左心室收缩功能比传统超声心动图测量更灵敏,可用于检测感染性患者的细微左心室功能障碍。我们的目的是研究血压正常的脓毒症重症监护患者左心室整体纵向应变的预测意义。方法:这项观察性前瞻性队列研究包括2021年6月1日至2021年8月31日期间入住重症监护室的感染性血压正常的成年人。在入院后24小时内使用斑点跟踪超声心动图测量左心室收缩功能。结果:152名患者入选。重症监护室的死亡率为27%。左心室整体纵向应变的负性较小,这表明非存活者的左心室功能比存活者差(中位数[四分位间距],-15.2[-17.2--12.5]对-17.3[-18.8--15.5];p<0.001)。预测重症监护室死亡率时,左心室整体纵向应变的最佳截止值为-17%(曲线下面积,0.728)。左心室整体纵应变>-17%的患者(阴性率低于-17%,表明左心室功能更差)显示出显著更高的死亡率(39.2%对13.7%;p<0.001)。根据多变量分析,左心室整体纵向应变是重症监护室死亡率的独立预测因素[OR(95%CI),1.326(1.038-1.693);p=0.024],以及有创机械通气和格拉斯哥昏迷量表、APACHE II和SOFA风险评分。结论:左心室整体纵向应变受损与死亡率相关,并为血压正常的脓毒症重症监护患者提供了预测数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信