Inhibitory control impairment in social disinhibition following severe traumatic brain injury: An experimental study using social and nonsocial go/no-go task.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1037/neu0000923
Michaela Filipčíková, Skye McDonald
{"title":"Inhibitory control impairment in social disinhibition following severe traumatic brain injury: An experimental study using social and nonsocial go/no-go task.","authors":"Michaela Filipčíková,&nbsp;Skye McDonald","doi":"10.1037/neu0000923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Inhibitory control impairment is highly prevalent following traumatic brain injury (TBI). There have not been any empirical investigations into whether this could explain social disinhibition following severe TBI. Further, social context may be important in studying social disinhibition. Therefore, the objectives of this research study were to investigate the role of inhibitory control impairment in social disinhibition following severe TBI, using a social and a nonsocial task.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a between-group comparative study. Twenty-six adult participants with severe TBI and 27 sex, age, and education-matched controls participated. Social disinhibition was assessed using the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale and the Social Disinhibition Interview. Inhibitory control was assessed using a social and a nonsocial go/no-go task. Two-way mixed analyses of covariance were used to test study hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, participants were slower, <i>F</i>(1, 43) = 9.841, <i>p</i> = .003, η<sub><i>p</i></sub>² = .245, and made more errors of commission on no-go trials, <i>F</i>(1, 44) = 11.560, <i>p</i> = .001, η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = .208, on the social go/no-go task. When categorized based on disinhibition level (high vs. low), the high disinhibition group made more errors on the social task, <i>F</i>(1, 41) = 4.095, <i>p</i> = .050, η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = .091, than the low disinhibition group, and more errors on the social, compared to nonsocial task, task-group interaction, <i>F</i>(1, 41) = 7.233, <i>p</i> = .010, η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = .150.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social disinhibition appears to be associated with inhibitory control impairment, although this is only evident when a social task is used. No relationship between social disinhibition and response speed was found. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Inhibitory control impairment is highly prevalent following traumatic brain injury (TBI). There have not been any empirical investigations into whether this could explain social disinhibition following severe TBI. Further, social context may be important in studying social disinhibition. Therefore, the objectives of this research study were to investigate the role of inhibitory control impairment in social disinhibition following severe TBI, using a social and a nonsocial task.

Method: This was a between-group comparative study. Twenty-six adult participants with severe TBI and 27 sex, age, and education-matched controls participated. Social disinhibition was assessed using the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale and the Social Disinhibition Interview. Inhibitory control was assessed using a social and a nonsocial go/no-go task. Two-way mixed analyses of covariance were used to test study hypotheses.

Results: Overall, participants were slower, F(1, 43) = 9.841, p = .003, ηp² = .245, and made more errors of commission on no-go trials, F(1, 44) = 11.560, p = .001, ηp² = .208, on the social go/no-go task. When categorized based on disinhibition level (high vs. low), the high disinhibition group made more errors on the social task, F(1, 41) = 4.095, p = .050, ηp² = .091, than the low disinhibition group, and more errors on the social, compared to nonsocial task, task-group interaction, F(1, 41) = 7.233, p = .010, ηp² = .150.

Conclusions: Social disinhibition appears to be associated with inhibitory control impairment, although this is only evident when a social task is used. No relationship between social disinhibition and response speed was found. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

严重创伤性脑损伤后社交去抑制中的抑制控制障碍:一项使用社交和非社交去/不去任务的实验研究。
目的:抑制性控制障碍在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后非常普遍。目前还没有任何实证研究表明这是否可以解释严重TBI后的社会去抑制。此外,社会背景在研究社会去抑制方面可能很重要。因此,本研究的目的是通过社会和非社会任务,研究抑制性控制障碍在严重TBI后社会去抑制中的作用。方法:采用组间比较研究。26名患有严重TBI的成年参与者和27名性别、年龄和教育程度匹配的对照组参与了研究。使用正面系统行为量表和社交抑制访谈对社交抑制进行评估。使用社会性和非社会性去/不去任务来评估抑制控制。协方差的双向混合分析用于检验研究假设。结果:总体而言,参与者在社交活动/不活动任务中的速度较慢,F(1,43)=9.841,p=.003,ηp²=.245,并且在不活动试验中犯了更多的错误,F(1,44)=11.560,p=.001,ηp㎡=.208。当根据去抑制水平(高与低)进行分类时,与低去抑制组相比,高去抑制组在社交任务上犯的错误更多,F(1,41)=4.095,p=.050,ηp²=.091,与非社交任务相比,在社交任务中犯的错误更多,任务组互动,F(1,41)=7.233,p=.010,ηp²=.150。结论:社交去抑制似乎与抑制性控制障碍有关,尽管这只有在使用社交任务时才明显。没有发现社交去抑制和反应速度之间的关系。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信