Usability of Different Methods to Assess and Improve Adherence to Therapeutic Footwear in Persons with the Diabetic Foot in Remission. A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Mateo López-Moral, Raúl J Molines-Barroso, María Herrera-Casamayor, Marta García-Madrid, Esther García-Morales, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
{"title":"Usability of Different Methods to Assess and Improve Adherence to Therapeutic Footwear in Persons with the Diabetic Foot in Remission. A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mateo López-Moral,&nbsp;Raúl J Molines-Barroso,&nbsp;María Herrera-Casamayor,&nbsp;Marta García-Madrid,&nbsp;Esther García-Morales,&nbsp;José Luis Lázaro-Martínez","doi":"10.1177/15347346231190680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic footwear (TF) has been demonstrated to decrease the rate of recurrence in patients in remission. TF adherence determines the real effect of such treatment and, therefore, an appropriate evaluation of TF adherence is critical to decrease recurrence. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the usability of different methods of assessing adherence to TF in patients with diabetic foot ulcers under remission. The search strategy retrieved 506 articles. Title and abstract review excluded 472, while the full-text review excluded an additional 18 articles because the included data did not meet the selection criteria. Finally, we included 16 articles in this systematic review. Six (37.5%) of the 16 studies combined objective (OM) and subjective methods (SM). Only five (31.25%) evaluated OM and six (37.5%) studies only evaluated SM. Objective methods (temperature sensor, activity monitor) and subjective methods (survey, questionnaire) have successfully been used in the literature to evaluate TF adherence. Objective methods provided accurate data, whereas subjective methods led to response bias or missing data. Methods of evaluation showed that patients use the TF more frequently outdoors and on weekdays than indoors or on the weekend. In conclusion, objective methods are the most usable way to measure adherence to TF.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346231190680"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231190680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic footwear (TF) has been demonstrated to decrease the rate of recurrence in patients in remission. TF adherence determines the real effect of such treatment and, therefore, an appropriate evaluation of TF adherence is critical to decrease recurrence. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the usability of different methods of assessing adherence to TF in patients with diabetic foot ulcers under remission. The search strategy retrieved 506 articles. Title and abstract review excluded 472, while the full-text review excluded an additional 18 articles because the included data did not meet the selection criteria. Finally, we included 16 articles in this systematic review. Six (37.5%) of the 16 studies combined objective (OM) and subjective methods (SM). Only five (31.25%) evaluated OM and six (37.5%) studies only evaluated SM. Objective methods (temperature sensor, activity monitor) and subjective methods (survey, questionnaire) have successfully been used in the literature to evaluate TF adherence. Objective methods provided accurate data, whereas subjective methods led to response bias or missing data. Methods of evaluation showed that patients use the TF more frequently outdoors and on weekdays than indoors or on the weekend. In conclusion, objective methods are the most usable way to measure adherence to TF.

评估和改善糖尿病足缓解期患者治疗性鞋类依从性的不同方法的可用性。系统评价。
治疗性鞋(TF)已被证明可以降低缓解期患者的复发率。依从性决定了治疗的实际效果,因此,对依从性进行适当的评估对于减少复发至关重要。本系统综述的目的是确定评估缓解期糖尿病足溃疡患者对TF依从性的不同方法的可用性。搜索策略检索了506篇文章。标题和摘要综述排除了472篇,而全文综述由于纳入的数据不符合选择标准,又排除了18篇。最后,我们纳入了16篇文章。16项研究中有6项(37.5%)采用客观方法(OM)和主观方法(SM)相结合的方法。仅5篇(31.25%)研究评价了OM, 6篇(37.5%)研究评价了SM。客观方法(温度传感器、活动监测仪)和主观方法(调查、问卷)已在文献中成功地用于评价TF依从性。客观方法提供准确的数据,而主观方法导致反应偏差或缺失数据。评估方法显示,患者在室外和工作日使用TF的频率高于室内或周末。总之,客观方法是衡量TF依从性的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信