Inpatient Care Utilization Following Mobile Crisis Response Encounters Among Racial/Ethnic Minoritized Youth

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Joyce H.L. Lui PhD , Belinda C. Chen MA , Lisa A. Benson PhD , Yen-Jui R. Lin PhD , Amanda Ruiz MD , Anna S. Lau PhD
{"title":"Inpatient Care Utilization Following Mobile Crisis Response Encounters Among Racial/Ethnic Minoritized Youth","authors":"Joyce H.L. Lui PhD ,&nbsp;Belinda C. Chen MA ,&nbsp;Lisa A. Benson PhD ,&nbsp;Yen-Jui R. Lin PhD ,&nbsp;Amanda Ruiz MD ,&nbsp;Anna S. Lau PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2023.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span><span>There has been an increase in youth psychiatric emergencies and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations in recent years. Mobile crisis response (MCR) services offer an opportunity to meet acute youth </span>mental health needs in the community and to provide linkage to care. However, an understanding of MCR encounters as a </span>care pathway is needed, including how patterns of subsequent care may vary by youth race/ethnicity. The current study examines racial/ethnic differences in the rates of inpatient care use following MCR among youth.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data included Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH) administrative claims for MCR in 2017 and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient services from 2017-2020 for youth aged 0 to 18 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this sample of 6,908 youth (70.4% racial/ethnic minoritized youth) who received an MCR, 3.2% received inpatient care within 30 days of their MCR, 18.6% received inpatient care beyond 30 days of their MCR, and 14.7% received repeated inpatient care episodes during the study period. Multivariate models revealed that Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) youth were less likely to receive inpatient care, whereas American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth were more likely to receive inpatient care following MCR. Youth age, primary language, primary diagnosis, and insurance status also predicted future inpatient episodes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings highlight differential rates of inpatient use following MCR among AAPI and AI/AN youth relative to youth from other groups. Alternative interpretations for the findings are offered related to differential levels of need and disparate penetration of community-based outpatient and prevention-focused services.</p></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><p>The study investigates racial and ethnic differences in the rates of inpatient care receipt after youth experience a psychiatric emergency in Los Angeles County. A total of 6,908 youth received mobile crisis response services and participated in the study. No racial/ethnic differences emerged in inpatient care use within the first month of receiving mobile crisis response services, but in the longer-term, Asian American/Pacific Islander youth were the least likely to receive inpatient care, and American Indian/Alaska Native youth were the most likely to receive inpatient. No differences in inpatient care use were observed for Black and Latinx youth relative to other youth in the study. Given the high costs for inpatient care, it remains critical to connect high-risk minoritized youth to less costly community-based care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856723003817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

There has been an increase in youth psychiatric emergencies and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations in recent years. Mobile crisis response (MCR) services offer an opportunity to meet acute youth mental health needs in the community and to provide linkage to care. However, an understanding of MCR encounters as a care pathway is needed, including how patterns of subsequent care may vary by youth race/ethnicity. The current study examines racial/ethnic differences in the rates of inpatient care use following MCR among youth.

Method

Data included Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH) administrative claims for MCR in 2017 and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient services from 2017-2020 for youth aged 0 to 18 years.

Results

In this sample of 6,908 youth (70.4% racial/ethnic minoritized youth) who received an MCR, 3.2% received inpatient care within 30 days of their MCR, 18.6% received inpatient care beyond 30 days of their MCR, and 14.7% received repeated inpatient care episodes during the study period. Multivariate models revealed that Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) youth were less likely to receive inpatient care, whereas American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth were more likely to receive inpatient care following MCR. Youth age, primary language, primary diagnosis, and insurance status also predicted future inpatient episodes.

Conclusion

Findings highlight differential rates of inpatient use following MCR among AAPI and AI/AN youth relative to youth from other groups. Alternative interpretations for the findings are offered related to differential levels of need and disparate penetration of community-based outpatient and prevention-focused services.

Plain language summary

The study investigates racial and ethnic differences in the rates of inpatient care receipt after youth experience a psychiatric emergency in Los Angeles County. A total of 6,908 youth received mobile crisis response services and participated in the study. No racial/ethnic differences emerged in inpatient care use within the first month of receiving mobile crisis response services, but in the longer-term, Asian American/Pacific Islander youth were the least likely to receive inpatient care, and American Indian/Alaska Native youth were the most likely to receive inpatient. No differences in inpatient care use were observed for Black and Latinx youth relative to other youth in the study. Given the high costs for inpatient care, it remains critical to connect high-risk minoritized youth to less costly community-based care.

少数种族/族裔青少年遭遇移动危机响应后的住院治疗使用情况。
目的:近年来,青少年精神科急诊和精神科住院人数不断增加。流动危机应对(MCR)服务提供了一个机会,可以满足社区内青少年的急性心理健康需求,并提供护理链接。然而,我们需要了解移动危机应对服务作为一种护理途径的情况,包括不同种族/族裔青少年的后续护理模式可能存在的差异。本研究探讨了青少年在接受 MCR 治疗后住院治疗率的种族/民族差异:数据包括洛杉矶县精神卫生局(LACDMH)2017 年对 MCR 的行政索赔,以及 2017-2020 年期间 0 至 18 岁青少年的精神病住院和门诊服务:在接受 MCR 的 6908 名青少年(70.4% 为少数种族/族裔青少年)样本中,3.2% 的青少年在接受 MCR 后 30 天内接受住院治疗,18.6% 的青少年在接受 MCR 后 30 天后接受住院治疗,14.7% 的青少年在研究期间重复接受住院治疗。多变量模型显示,亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民(AAPI)青少年接受住院治疗的可能性较低,而美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)青少年在MCR后接受住院治疗的可能性较高。青少年的年龄、主要语言、主要诊断和保险状况也预示着未来的住院治疗情况:研究结果表明,与其他群体的青少年相比,亚裔美国人和亚裔美国人/印第安人青少年在接受 MCR 后住院治疗的比例有所不同。研究结果的其他解释与不同的需求水平以及社区门诊和以预防为重点的服务的不同渗透率有关。该研究调查了洛杉矶县青少年在经历精神病急诊后住院治疗率的种族和民族差异。共有 6908 名青少年接受了流动危机应对服务并参与了研究。在接受流动危机应对服务的第一个月内,住院治疗的使用情况没有出现种族/族裔差异,但从长期来看,亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民青少年接受住院治疗的可能性最小,而美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民青少年接受住院治疗的可能性最大。与研究中的其他青少年相比,黑人和拉丁裔青少年的住院治疗使用率没有差异。鉴于住院治疗的高昂费用,将高风险的少数民族青少年与费用较低的社区护理联系起来仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信