Polygenic risk scores: the future of cancer risk prediction, screening, and precision prevention.

Medical review (Berlin, Germany) Pub Date : 2022-02-14 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1515/mr-2021-0025
Yuzhuo Wang, Meng Zhu, Hongxia Ma, Hongbing Shen
{"title":"Polygenic risk scores: the future of cancer risk prediction, screening, and precision prevention.","authors":"Yuzhuo Wang,&nbsp;Meng Zhu,&nbsp;Hongxia Ma,&nbsp;Hongbing Shen","doi":"10.1515/mr-2021-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have shown that the genetic architecture of cancers are highly polygenic and enabled researchers to identify genetic risk loci for cancers. The genetic variants associated with a cancer can be combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS), which captures part of an individual's genetic susceptibility to cancer. Recently, PRSs have been widely used in cancer risk prediction and are shown to be capable of identifying groups of individuals who could benefit from the knowledge of their probabilistic susceptibility to cancer, which leads to an increased interest in understanding the potential utility of PRSs that might further refine the assessment and management of cancer risk. In this context, we provide an overview of the major discoveries from cancer GWASs. We then review the methodologies used for PRS construction, and describe steps for the development and evaluation of risk prediction models that include PRS and/or conventional risk factors. Potential utility of PRSs in cancer risk prediction, screening, and precision prevention are illustrated. Challenges and practical considerations relevant to the implementation of PRSs in health care settings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74151,"journal":{"name":"Medical review (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"1 2","pages":"129-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/4b/mr-1-2-mr-2021-0025.PMC10471106.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical review (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mr-2021-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have shown that the genetic architecture of cancers are highly polygenic and enabled researchers to identify genetic risk loci for cancers. The genetic variants associated with a cancer can be combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS), which captures part of an individual's genetic susceptibility to cancer. Recently, PRSs have been widely used in cancer risk prediction and are shown to be capable of identifying groups of individuals who could benefit from the knowledge of their probabilistic susceptibility to cancer, which leads to an increased interest in understanding the potential utility of PRSs that might further refine the assessment and management of cancer risk. In this context, we provide an overview of the major discoveries from cancer GWASs. We then review the methodologies used for PRS construction, and describe steps for the development and evaluation of risk prediction models that include PRS and/or conventional risk factors. Potential utility of PRSs in cancer risk prediction, screening, and precision prevention are illustrated. Challenges and practical considerations relevant to the implementation of PRSs in health care settings are discussed.

Abstract Image

多基因风险评分:癌症风险预测、筛查和精准预防的未来。
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)表明,癌症的遗传结构是高度多基因的,使研究人员能够确定癌症的遗传风险位点。与癌症相关的遗传变异可以合并为多基因风险评分(PRS),该评分反映了个体对癌症的部分遗传易感性。最近,PRS已被广泛用于癌症风险预测,并被证明能够识别可能受益于其对癌症概率易感性的个体群体,这导致人们对了解PRS的潜在效用的兴趣增加,这可能会进一步完善癌症风险的评估和管理。在此背景下,我们概述了癌症GWAS的主要发现。然后,我们回顾了用于PRS构建的方法,并描述了包括PRS和/或传统风险因素的风险预测模型的开发和评估步骤。说明了PRS在癌症风险预测、筛查和精准预防中的潜在用途。讨论了在卫生保健环境中实施PRS的挑战和实际考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信