Augmentation by Counterfactual Explanation - Fixing an Overconfident Classifier.

Sumedha Singla, Nihal Murali, Forough Arabshahi, Sofia Triantafyllou, Kayhan Batmanghelich
{"title":"Augmentation by Counterfactual Explanation - Fixing an Overconfident Classifier.","authors":"Sumedha Singla,&nbsp;Nihal Murali,&nbsp;Forough Arabshahi,&nbsp;Sofia Triantafyllou,&nbsp;Kayhan Batmanghelich","doi":"10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A highly accurate but overconfident model is ill-suited for deployment in critical applications such as healthcare and autonomous driving. The classification outcome should reflect a high uncertainty on ambiguous in-distribution samples that lie close to the decision boundary. The model should also refrain from making overconfident decisions on samples that lie far outside its training distribution, far-out-of-distribution (far-OOD), or on unseen samples from novel classes that lie near its training distribution (near-OOD). This paper proposes an application of counterfactual explanations in fixing an over-confident classifier. Specifically, we propose to fine-tune a given pre-trained classifier using augmentations from a counterfactual explainer (ACE) to fix its uncertainty characteristics while retaining its predictive performance. We perform extensive experiments with detecting far-OOD, near-OOD, and ambiguous samples. Our empirical results show that the revised model have improved uncertainty measures, and its performance is competitive to the state-of-the-art methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":73325,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision","volume":"2023 ","pages":"4709-4719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506513/pdf/nihms-1915803.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A highly accurate but overconfident model is ill-suited for deployment in critical applications such as healthcare and autonomous driving. The classification outcome should reflect a high uncertainty on ambiguous in-distribution samples that lie close to the decision boundary. The model should also refrain from making overconfident decisions on samples that lie far outside its training distribution, far-out-of-distribution (far-OOD), or on unseen samples from novel classes that lie near its training distribution (near-OOD). This paper proposes an application of counterfactual explanations in fixing an over-confident classifier. Specifically, we propose to fine-tune a given pre-trained classifier using augmentations from a counterfactual explainer (ACE) to fix its uncertainty characteristics while retaining its predictive performance. We perform extensive experiments with detecting far-OOD, near-OOD, and ambiguous samples. Our empirical results show that the revised model have improved uncertainty measures, and its performance is competitive to the state-of-the-art methods.

反事实解释的扩充——修复一个过于自信的分类器。
高度准确但过于自信的模型不适合部署在医疗保健和自动驾驶等关键应用中。分类结果应反映出接近决策边界的分布中模糊样本的高度不确定性。该模型还应避免对远离其训练分布、远离分布(远OOD)的样本或来自靠近其训练分布(近OOD)新类的看不见的样本做出过于自信的决定。本文提出了反事实解释在固定过度自信分类器中的应用。具体来说,我们建议使用反事实解释器(ACE)的增强来微调给定的预训练分类器,以固定其不确定性特征,同时保持其预测性能。我们对检测远OOD、近OOD和模糊样本进行了大量实验。我们的实证结果表明,修正后的模型改进了不确定性度量,其性能与最先进的方法相比具有竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信