Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the 2011-2019 Society for Education in Anesthesia Meetings.

Dante A Cerza, Collin F Battista, Gautam Sharma, Tetsuro Sakai
{"title":"Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the 2011-2019 Society for Education in Anesthesia Meetings.","authors":"Dante A Cerza,&nbsp;Collin F Battista,&nbsp;Gautam Sharma,&nbsp;Tetsuro Sakai","doi":"10.46374/volxxv_issue3_Cerza","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Society for Education in Anesthesia (SEA) promotes dissemination of discoveries and innovations. We investigated the rate of publication of SEA Spring Meeting abstracts, hypothesizing that Research abstracts were published more frequently than Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We also studied the time between abstract presentation and publication and tracked the journals in which they were published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All abstracts presented at SEA spring meetings from 2011-2019 were included. We searched PubMed for published articles that were based on those SEA abstracts. We calculated the overall publication rate and the respective publication rates for Research and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and performed the Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test to compare publication rates between Research abstracts and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated the mean number of years between meeting presentation and publication and tabulated the number of works published in each journal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 351 abstracts (128 Research and 223 Curriculum) were presented at SEA spring meetings. The overall publication rate was 15% (52/351). Research abstracts were published more frequently than Curriculum abstracts: 24.2% (31/128) versus 9.4% (21/223); OR = 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.6); P = .0003. The mean time from presentation to publication was 1.7 ± 1.3 years. The works appeared in 20 different journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SEA Spring Meeting abstracts were published less frequently than abstracts from other medical professional society meetings (21%-72.3%). Although the lower publication rate of Innovative Curriculum abstracts unique to the SEA meeting largely explains this shortfall, a relatively low publication rate, even for the Research abstracts, signals opportunities for growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"25 3","pages":"E707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502582/pdf/i2333-0406-25-3-Cerza.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue3_Cerza","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Society for Education in Anesthesia (SEA) promotes dissemination of discoveries and innovations. We investigated the rate of publication of SEA Spring Meeting abstracts, hypothesizing that Research abstracts were published more frequently than Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We also studied the time between abstract presentation and publication and tracked the journals in which they were published.

Methods: All abstracts presented at SEA spring meetings from 2011-2019 were included. We searched PubMed for published articles that were based on those SEA abstracts. We calculated the overall publication rate and the respective publication rates for Research and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and performed the Pearson χ2 test to compare publication rates between Research abstracts and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated the mean number of years between meeting presentation and publication and tabulated the number of works published in each journal.

Results: A total of 351 abstracts (128 Research and 223 Curriculum) were presented at SEA spring meetings. The overall publication rate was 15% (52/351). Research abstracts were published more frequently than Curriculum abstracts: 24.2% (31/128) versus 9.4% (21/223); OR = 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.6); P = .0003. The mean time from presentation to publication was 1.7 ± 1.3 years. The works appeared in 20 different journals.

Conclusion: SEA Spring Meeting abstracts were published less frequently than abstracts from other medical professional society meetings (21%-72.3%). Although the lower publication rate of Innovative Curriculum abstracts unique to the SEA meeting largely explains this shortfall, a relatively low publication rate, even for the Research abstracts, signals opportunities for growth.

2011-2019年麻醉教育学会会议上发表的摘要发表率。
简介:麻醉教育协会(SEA)促进发现和创新的传播。我们调查了SEA春季会议摘要的发表率,假设研究摘要的发表频率高于创新课程摘要。我们还研究了摘要发表和发表之间的时间间隔,并跟踪了发表这些摘要的期刊。方法:纳入2011-2019年SEA春季会议上发表的所有摘要。我们在PubMed上搜索了基于这些SEA摘要的已发表文章。我们计算了研究和创新课程摘要的总体出版率和各自的出版率。我们计算比值比(OR),并进行Pearson χ2检验,比较研究摘要和创新课程摘要的发表率。我们计算了会议发表和发表之间的平均年数,并将在每个期刊上发表的作品数量制成表格。结果:在SEA春季会议上共发表了351篇摘要(其中研究128篇,课程223篇)。总发表率为15%(52/351)。研究摘要的发表频率高于课程摘要:24.2%(31/128)对9.4% (21/223);OR = 3.1(95%置信区间,1.7-5.6);P = 0.0003。从发表到发表的平均时间为1.7±1.3年。这些作品发表在20种不同的期刊上。结论:SEA春季会议摘要的发表频率低于其他医学专业学会会议摘要(21%-72.3%)。虽然SEA会议特有的创新课程摘要较低的出版率在很大程度上解释了这一不足,但即使是研究摘要,相对较低的出版率也标志着增长的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信