{"title":"Optimization of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: updates and unanswered questions.","authors":"Victoria W Fitz, Shruthi Mahalingaiah","doi":"10.1097/MED.0000000000000780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Narrative review of recent literature on optimization of assisted reproduction technology outcomes in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The key areas of focus include pre cycle treatment with the goal of cohort synchronization, methods of ovulation suppression and trigger medication. There is no definitive evidence that precycle treatment with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or progestins improve or negatively impact in vitro fertilization outcomes in patients with PCOS. The reviewed evidence supports consideration of progestins as suppression of premature ovulation in patients with PCOS as an alternative to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist if a freeze all protocol is planned. There is limited prospective evidence in PCOS populations regarding use of a dual trigger using GnRH agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review has implications for clinical practice regarding ovarian stimulation protocols for patients with PCOS. We also identified areas of research need including the further exploration of the value of pre cycle COC or progestin use in a PCOS population, also the use of GnRH agonist in combination with hCG in a well defined PCOS population and using GnRH agonist trigger alone as a control.</p>","PeriodicalId":10964,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity","volume":"29 6","pages":"547-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Narrative review of recent literature on optimization of assisted reproduction technology outcomes in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
Recent findings: The key areas of focus include pre cycle treatment with the goal of cohort synchronization, methods of ovulation suppression and trigger medication. There is no definitive evidence that precycle treatment with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or progestins improve or negatively impact in vitro fertilization outcomes in patients with PCOS. The reviewed evidence supports consideration of progestins as suppression of premature ovulation in patients with PCOS as an alternative to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist if a freeze all protocol is planned. There is limited prospective evidence in PCOS populations regarding use of a dual trigger using GnRH agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).
Summary: This review has implications for clinical practice regarding ovarian stimulation protocols for patients with PCOS. We also identified areas of research need including the further exploration of the value of pre cycle COC or progestin use in a PCOS population, also the use of GnRH agonist in combination with hCG in a well defined PCOS population and using GnRH agonist trigger alone as a control.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments in the field from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring twelve key topics – including androgens, gastrointestinal hormones, diabetes and the endocrine pancreas, and neuroendocrinology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.