Incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade - A multicenter, observational study in Portugal (INSPIRE 2).

Simão Esteves, Filinto Correia de Barros, Catarina S Nunes, Andreia Puga, Blandina Gomes, Fernando Abelha, Humberto Machado, Milene Ferreira, Nuno Fernandes, Paula Vítor, Sandra Pereira, Teresa A Lapa, Vítor Pinho-Oliveira
{"title":"Incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade - A multicenter, observational study in Portugal (INSPIRE 2).","authors":"Simão Esteves,&nbsp;Filinto Correia de Barros,&nbsp;Catarina S Nunes,&nbsp;Andreia Puga,&nbsp;Blandina Gomes,&nbsp;Fernando Abelha,&nbsp;Humberto Machado,&nbsp;Milene Ferreira,&nbsp;Nuno Fernandes,&nbsp;Paula Vítor,&nbsp;Sandra Pereira,&nbsp;Teresa A Lapa,&nbsp;Vítor Pinho-Oliveira","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) optimizes surgical conditions and facilitates tracheal intubation, it can lead to residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB), with postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess RNMB incidence and management in Portugal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational study of patients admitted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with nondepolarizing NMBAs between July 2018 and July 2019 at 10 Portuguese hospitals. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients arriving at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) with a TOF ratio <0.9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 366 patients were included, with a median age of 59 years, and 89.1% classified as ASA II or III. Rocuronium was the most used NMBA (99.5%). A total of 96.2% of patients received a reversal agent, 96.6% of which sugammadex and 3.4% neostigmine. Twenty patients displayed a TOF ratio <0.9 at PACU arrival, representing an RNMB incidence of 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1%-7.8%). Only two patients displayed a TOF ratio <0.7. RNMB incidence was 16.7% with neostigmine and 5.3% with sugammadex (<i>P</i> = .114). In patients with intraoperative neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring, RNMB incidence was 5% (95% CI, 2%-8%), which varied significantly according to the type of monitoring (<i>P</i> = .018). Incidence of adverse events was 3.3% (2 severe and 10 moderate).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reported overall incidence of 5.5% is numerically lower than results from similar observational studies. An appropriate pharmacological neuromuscular reversal strategy, guided by quantitative neuromuscular monitoring, has the potential to achieve even better results, converting RNMB from an unusual to a very rare or even inexistent event.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 4","pages":"e225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7f/c1/pj9-8-e225.PMC10400047.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) optimizes surgical conditions and facilitates tracheal intubation, it can lead to residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB), with postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess RNMB incidence and management in Portugal.

Methods: Prospective observational study of patients admitted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with nondepolarizing NMBAs between July 2018 and July 2019 at 10 Portuguese hospitals. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients arriving at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) with a TOF ratio <0.9.

Results: A total of 366 patients were included, with a median age of 59 years, and 89.1% classified as ASA II or III. Rocuronium was the most used NMBA (99.5%). A total of 96.2% of patients received a reversal agent, 96.6% of which sugammadex and 3.4% neostigmine. Twenty patients displayed a TOF ratio <0.9 at PACU arrival, representing an RNMB incidence of 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1%-7.8%). Only two patients displayed a TOF ratio <0.7. RNMB incidence was 16.7% with neostigmine and 5.3% with sugammadex (P = .114). In patients with intraoperative neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring, RNMB incidence was 5% (95% CI, 2%-8%), which varied significantly according to the type of monitoring (P = .018). Incidence of adverse events was 3.3% (2 severe and 10 moderate).

Conclusions: The reported overall incidence of 5.5% is numerically lower than results from similar observational studies. An appropriate pharmacological neuromuscular reversal strategy, guided by quantitative neuromuscular monitoring, has the potential to achieve even better results, converting RNMB from an unusual to a very rare or even inexistent event.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

术后残留神经肌肉阻滞的发生率-葡萄牙的一项多中心观察性研究(INSPIRE 2)。
背景:虽然神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba)的使用优化了手术条件,促进了气管插管,但它可能导致残留的神经肌肉阻滞(rmmb),并伴有术后并发症。本研究旨在评估葡萄牙的rmb发病率和管理情况。方法:前瞻性观察研究2018年7月至2019年7月在葡萄牙10家医院接受择期手术需要全身麻醉的非去极化nmba患者。主要终点是到达麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的TOF比率的患者比例。结果:共纳入366例患者,中位年龄59岁,89.1%的患者被分类为ASA II或III级。罗库溴铵是使用最多的NMBA(99.5%)。共有96.2%的患者使用了逆转药物,其中96.6%的患者使用了糖玛德,3.4%的患者使用了新斯的明。20例患者TOF率(P = 0.114)。术中有神经肌肉阻断(NMB)监测的患者,RNMB发生率为5% (95% CI, 2% ~ 8%),不同监测类型RNMB发生率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.018)。不良事件发生率为3.3%(重度2例,中度10例)。结论:报告的5.5%的总发病率在数值上低于类似观察性研究的结果。在定量神经肌肉监测的指导下,适当的药理神经肌肉逆转策略有可能取得更好的结果,将rmb从不寻常的事件转变为非常罕见甚至不存在的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信