The effect of oral anticoagulant use before visit for patients with COVID-19 on mortality: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cornelia Ghea, Ardyan Wardhana, Alfredo Nugroho, Fika Humaeda Assilmi
{"title":"The effect of oral anticoagulant use before visit for patients with COVID-19 on mortality: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Cornelia Ghea,&nbsp;Ardyan Wardhana,&nbsp;Alfredo Nugroho,&nbsp;Fika Humaeda Assilmi","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_199_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anticoagulants have been used as therapeutic or prophylactic agents in COVID-19 and seem to be more beneficial. However, the advantage of oral anticoagulant (OAC) consumption before visit in lowering mortality in COVID-19 patients remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC use before visit on mortality using the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the effect of time-to-event endpoints.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in the PubMed and ProQuest databases for any studies comparing groups consuming OAC to no-OAC before visit for mortality in patients with COVID-19. We calculated the overall HRs and their variances across the studies using the random-effects model to obtain pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 studies which had sample sizes ranging from 70 to 459,402 patients. A meta-analysis comparing OAC therapy and non-OAC consumption in COVID-19 patients before visit revealed no decrease in all-cause mortality (HR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-1.02, <i>P</i> = 0.12; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 68%). However, subgroup analysis of laboratory-confirmed populations revealed that OAC use before visit had a beneficial effect on mortality (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.02; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of OAC before visit had no beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/81/TCMJ-35-226.PMC10399847.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_199_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Anticoagulants have been used as therapeutic or prophylactic agents in COVID-19 and seem to be more beneficial. However, the advantage of oral anticoagulant (OAC) consumption before visit in lowering mortality in COVID-19 patients remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC use before visit on mortality using the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the effect of time-to-event endpoints.

Materials and methods: We conducted a literature search in the PubMed and ProQuest databases for any studies comparing groups consuming OAC to no-OAC before visit for mortality in patients with COVID-19. We calculated the overall HRs and their variances across the studies using the random-effects model to obtain pooled estimates.

Results: We included 12 studies which had sample sizes ranging from 70 to 459,402 patients. A meta-analysis comparing OAC therapy and non-OAC consumption in COVID-19 patients before visit revealed no decrease in all-cause mortality (HR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-1.02, P = 0.12; I2 = 68%). However, subgroup analysis of laboratory-confirmed populations revealed that OAC use before visit had a beneficial effect on mortality (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98, P = 0.02; I2 = 56%).

Conclusion: The use of OAC before visit had no beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19患者就诊前口服抗凝剂对死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析
目的:抗凝血剂已被用作COVID-19的治疗或预防药物,似乎更有益。然而,就诊前口服抗凝剂(OAC)在降低COVID-19患者死亡率方面的优势仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估就诊前使用OAC对死亡率的影响,使用风险比(HR)来估计时间到事件终点的影响。材料和方法:我们在PubMed和ProQuest数据库中进行了文献检索,以比较就诊前服用OAC组和未服用OAC组对COVID-19患者死亡率的影响。我们使用随机效应模型计算了所有研究的总体hr及其方差,以获得汇总估计。结果:我们纳入了12项研究,样本量从70到459,402例患者。一项比较就诊前COVID-19患者OAC治疗和非OAC治疗的荟萃分析显示,全因死亡率没有下降(HR = 0.92, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.83-1.02, P = 0.12;I2 = 68%)。然而,对实验室确认人群的亚组分析显示,就诊前使用OAC对死亡率有有益影响(HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98, P = 0.02;I2 = 56%)。结论:就诊前使用OAC对COVID-19患者全因死亡率无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信