Neuroendocrine mechanisms contributing to the coevolution of sociality and communication

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Megan K. Freiler, G. Troy Smith
{"title":"Neuroendocrine mechanisms contributing to the coevolution of sociality and communication","authors":"Megan K. Freiler,&nbsp;G. Troy Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Communication is inherently social, so signaling systems should evolve with social systems. The ‘social complexity hypothesis’ posits that social complexity necessitates communicative complexity and is generally supported in vocalizing mammals. This hypothesis, however, has seldom been tested outside the acoustic modality, and comparisons across studies are confounded by varying definitions of complexity. Moreover, proximate mechanisms underlying coevolution of sociality and communication remain largely unexamined. In this review, we argue that to uncover how sociality and communication coevolve, we need to examine variation in the neuroendocrine mechanisms that coregulate social behavior and signal production and perception. Specifically, we focus on steroid hormones, monoamines, and nonapeptides, which modulate both social behavior and sensorimotor circuits and are likely targets of selection during social evolution. Lastly, we highlight weakly electric fishes as an ideal system in which to comparatively address the proximate mechanisms underlying relationships between social and signal diversity in a novel modality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12469,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101077"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302223000250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communication is inherently social, so signaling systems should evolve with social systems. The ‘social complexity hypothesis’ posits that social complexity necessitates communicative complexity and is generally supported in vocalizing mammals. This hypothesis, however, has seldom been tested outside the acoustic modality, and comparisons across studies are confounded by varying definitions of complexity. Moreover, proximate mechanisms underlying coevolution of sociality and communication remain largely unexamined. In this review, we argue that to uncover how sociality and communication coevolve, we need to examine variation in the neuroendocrine mechanisms that coregulate social behavior and signal production and perception. Specifically, we focus on steroid hormones, monoamines, and nonapeptides, which modulate both social behavior and sensorimotor circuits and are likely targets of selection during social evolution. Lastly, we highlight weakly electric fishes as an ideal system in which to comparatively address the proximate mechanisms underlying relationships between social and signal diversity in a novel modality.

神经内分泌机制有助于社会性和沟通的共同进化。
通信本质上是社会性的,因此信号系统应该随着社会系统的发展而发展。“社会复杂性假说”认为,社会复杂性需要交际复杂性,这在哺乳动物发声中得到了普遍支持。然而,这一假设很少在声学模态之外得到检验,不同研究之间的比较因复杂性的不同定义而混淆。此外,社会性和交际共同进化的直接机制在很大程度上还没有得到检验。在这篇综述中,我们认为,为了揭示社会性和沟通是如何共同进化的,我们需要研究共同调节社会行为、信号产生和感知的神经内分泌机制的变化。具体而言,我们关注类固醇激素、单胺和九肽,它们调节社会行为和感觉运动回路,可能是社会进化过程中的选择目标。最后,我们强调弱电鱼是一个理想的系统,在这个系统中,我们可以用一种新的方式来比较解决社会和信号多样性之间关系的直接机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (FIN) publishes a wide range of informative articles including comprehensive reviews, systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and meta-analyses. While the majority of reviews are invited, we also embrace unsolicited reviews and meta-analyses, as well as proposals for thematic special issues, provided they meet our rigorous quality standards. In addition, we encourage authors to submit commentaries that concisely present fresh ideas or offer further analysis to delve deeper into the implications of an article published in our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信