Heavy organic deposit comprehensive analysis and testing techniques

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Abdulaziz Al-Qasim, Fahad Almudairis, Mutaz Alsubhi
{"title":"Heavy organic deposit comprehensive analysis and testing techniques","authors":"Abdulaziz Al-Qasim,&nbsp;Fahad Almudairis,&nbsp;Mutaz Alsubhi","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Formation damage resulting from organic and inorganic depositions, such as calcium carbonate<span>, asphaltene and paraffin, is one of the most commonly encountered types of damage in the oil and gas industry<span>. These depositions are usually associated with a decrease in crude productivity, accelerated failure of production equipment, such as electrical submersible pumps (ESPs), and less footage covered while running with production and flow profile logging tools. Therefore, formation damage and in particular organic deposits should be analyzed and complete testing should be performed to increase the productivity and ensure smooth operations.</span></span></p><p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis procedure for heavy organic sample deposits collected from wells located in one of the oilfields in Saudi Arabia. The samples were collected from different sources such as production logging tools, pulling out a failed ESP, and lowering completion equipment. The hydrocarbon phase was removed by organic solvent and the precipitated solid materials were collected for a lab analysis and solubility test. An identification and evaluation of the organic deposit compositions were investigated using SARA analysis and coreflood techniques. Organic solvents are used to replace the aromatic ones in order to minimize the toxicity and health concerns.</p><p><span><span><span>Several testing techniques were used for better understanding of the collected samples including thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The TGA was used to determine the rate of </span>thermal decomposition and measure and change in weight of the samples. Three temperatures were used, 180 °C, 550 °C, and 990 °C and the total weight loss values ranged from 19 to 66 wt% except for the oriental sample, which showed a 71%. The XRD was used to identify the complete structure of the samples and found that they are mainly carbonate of </span>Calcite<span> and Halite in which can be removed by acids like 15 wt% of HCI at reservoir conditions. A small fraction of dolomites, quartz, </span></span>microcline<span><span>, chlorite, and illite were identified as well. Static and dynamic solubility tests were performed with more solids observed in the static one. Two different soaking times: 3 and 24 h at both room temperature and 50 °C were implemented using 1:10 ratio of weight to solvent. The samples were found to be purely organic with between 20% and 60% </span>asphaltene content. The performance of the solvents was negatively affected by the soaking time and better to be limited to 3–5 h.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100021","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Formation damage resulting from organic and inorganic depositions, such as calcium carbonate, asphaltene and paraffin, is one of the most commonly encountered types of damage in the oil and gas industry. These depositions are usually associated with a decrease in crude productivity, accelerated failure of production equipment, such as electrical submersible pumps (ESPs), and less footage covered while running with production and flow profile logging tools. Therefore, formation damage and in particular organic deposits should be analyzed and complete testing should be performed to increase the productivity and ensure smooth operations.

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis procedure for heavy organic sample deposits collected from wells located in one of the oilfields in Saudi Arabia. The samples were collected from different sources such as production logging tools, pulling out a failed ESP, and lowering completion equipment. The hydrocarbon phase was removed by organic solvent and the precipitated solid materials were collected for a lab analysis and solubility test. An identification and evaluation of the organic deposit compositions were investigated using SARA analysis and coreflood techniques. Organic solvents are used to replace the aromatic ones in order to minimize the toxicity and health concerns.

Several testing techniques were used for better understanding of the collected samples including thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The TGA was used to determine the rate of thermal decomposition and measure and change in weight of the samples. Three temperatures were used, 180 °C, 550 °C, and 990 °C and the total weight loss values ranged from 19 to 66 wt% except for the oriental sample, which showed a 71%. The XRD was used to identify the complete structure of the samples and found that they are mainly carbonate of Calcite and Halite in which can be removed by acids like 15 wt% of HCI at reservoir conditions. A small fraction of dolomites, quartz, microcline, chlorite, and illite were identified as well. Static and dynamic solubility tests were performed with more solids observed in the static one. Two different soaking times: 3 and 24 h at both room temperature and 50 °C were implemented using 1:10 ratio of weight to solvent. The samples were found to be purely organic with between 20% and 60% asphaltene content. The performance of the solvents was negatively affected by the soaking time and better to be limited to 3–5 h.

重有机质矿床综合分析测试技术
由碳酸钙、沥青质和石蜡等有机和无机沉积引起的地层损害是油气行业中最常见的损害类型之一。这些沉积通常伴随着原油产量的下降,生产设备(如电潜泵(esp))的加速故障,以及使用生产和流量剖面测井工具时覆盖的进尺较少。因此,应该分析地层损害,特别是有机沉积,并进行完整的测试,以提高产能,确保顺利作业。本文介绍了在沙特阿拉伯某油田的井中采集的重质有机样品沉积物的综合分析方法。样品来自不同的来源,如生产测井工具、拔出故障的电潜泵和下放完井设备。用有机溶剂除去烃类相,并收集沉淀固体物质进行实验室分析和溶解度测试。利用SARA分析和岩心驱替技术对有机质沉积物组成进行了识别和评价。使用有机溶剂代替芳香族溶剂,以尽量减少毒性和健康问题。为了更好地了解所收集的样品,使用了几种测试技术,包括热重分析(TGA)和x射线衍射(XRD)。用热重分析仪测定样品的热分解速率,测定样品的重量变化。使用了180°C、550°C和990°C三种温度,总失重值从19%到66%不等,东方样品的失重值为71%。利用XRD对样品进行了完整的结构鉴定,发现样品主要为方解石和岩盐的碳酸盐,在储层条件下,其中的15 wt%的HCI可以被酸去除。少量白云岩、石英、微斜长石、绿泥石和伊利石也被发现。静态溶解度试验和动态溶解度试验在静态溶解度中观察到更多的固体。两种不同的浸泡时间:在室温和50℃下,以1:10的重量与溶剂的比例进行3和24 h。这些样品是纯有机的,沥青质含量在20%到60%之间。溶剂的性能受浸泡时间的不利影响,最好限制在3-5 h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信