Elective Foot and Ankle Procedures in the Patients Greater than 65 Years of Age: Worth the Mobility Gains.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Wesley Manz, Joseph Novack, Juliet Fink, Joseph Jacobson, Jason Bariteau
{"title":"Elective Foot and Ankle Procedures in the Patients Greater than 65 Years of Age: Worth the Mobility Gains.","authors":"Wesley Manz,&nbsp;Joseph Novack,&nbsp;Juliet Fink,&nbsp;Joseph Jacobson,&nbsp;Jason Bariteau","doi":"10.1177/21514593231184316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic, non-traumatic pathologies of the foot and ankle can be mobility-limiting for patients of all ages. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative changes in LifeSpace Mobility Assessment (LSA) scores of adult and elderly patients following elective foot and ankle surgery. A prospective study of 184 patients undergoing elective ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot procedures conducted by one surgeon between 2015 and 2019 was undertaken. Patient-reported LSA scores were collected at preoperative, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Patient data was compared using an independent sample t-test for continuous, normally distributed data and a chi-squared or Fischer's exact test for categorical data. Alpha and beta were .05 and .8. Patients were divided based on age. 140 patients were observed in the younger (<65) group, 44 patients were observed in the elderly (≥65) group. The average LSA score of elderly patients at the preoperative visit was 58.3 (SD 38.0) vs 79.3 (SD 38.8) in the younger cohort (P = .041). Both patient cohorts saw decreased mobility at 3-month postoperative visits but surpassed preoperative mobility scores by 6 months and 1 year postop. No difference in average mobility score was observed between young (85.6, SD 36.1) and elderly (90.1, SD 34.3) cohorts at 1-year follow up. Given the increased rates of perioperative comorbidities and the heightened risks of intraoperative complications, physicians may be more inclined to manage elderly patients with longer periods of conservative treatment for similar pathologies. However, these results imply that elderly patients experience similar improvements after surgery to younger cohorts and should not be excluded from surgical consideration. Our results, in tandem with literature showing the deleterious effects of decreased mobility in the elderly, suggest that the discussion to pursue or hold surgical correction of chronic foot and ankle disease in patients over age 65 must consider the mobility benefits of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"14 ","pages":"21514593231184316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/d1/10.1177_21514593231184316.PMC10363904.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231184316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic, non-traumatic pathologies of the foot and ankle can be mobility-limiting for patients of all ages. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative changes in LifeSpace Mobility Assessment (LSA) scores of adult and elderly patients following elective foot and ankle surgery. A prospective study of 184 patients undergoing elective ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot procedures conducted by one surgeon between 2015 and 2019 was undertaken. Patient-reported LSA scores were collected at preoperative, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Patient data was compared using an independent sample t-test for continuous, normally distributed data and a chi-squared or Fischer's exact test for categorical data. Alpha and beta were .05 and .8. Patients were divided based on age. 140 patients were observed in the younger (<65) group, 44 patients were observed in the elderly (≥65) group. The average LSA score of elderly patients at the preoperative visit was 58.3 (SD 38.0) vs 79.3 (SD 38.8) in the younger cohort (P = .041). Both patient cohorts saw decreased mobility at 3-month postoperative visits but surpassed preoperative mobility scores by 6 months and 1 year postop. No difference in average mobility score was observed between young (85.6, SD 36.1) and elderly (90.1, SD 34.3) cohorts at 1-year follow up. Given the increased rates of perioperative comorbidities and the heightened risks of intraoperative complications, physicians may be more inclined to manage elderly patients with longer periods of conservative treatment for similar pathologies. However, these results imply that elderly patients experience similar improvements after surgery to younger cohorts and should not be excluded from surgical consideration. Our results, in tandem with literature showing the deleterious effects of decreased mobility in the elderly, suggest that the discussion to pursue or hold surgical correction of chronic foot and ankle disease in patients over age 65 must consider the mobility benefits of surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

65岁以上患者的选择性足部和踝关节手术:值得获得活动能力。
慢性、非创伤性足部和踝关节病变可限制所有年龄的患者的活动能力。本研究的目的是比较成人和老年患者选择性足部和踝关节手术后生活空间活动评估(LSA)评分的变化。对一名外科医生在2015年至2019年期间进行的选择性踝关节、后足和足中部手术的184名患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。在术前、6个月和12个月的随访中收集患者报告的LSA评分。对连续、正态分布的数据采用独立样本t检验,对分类数据采用卡方检验或Fischer精确检验。α和β分别为0.05和0.8。患者根据年龄进行分组。观察了140例年轻(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信