{"title":"Interaction between maintenance variables of medical ultrasound scanners through multifactor dimensionality reduction.","authors":"Alejandro Prieto-Fernández, Gonzalo Sánchez-Barroso, Jaime González-Domínguez, Justo García-Sanz-Calcedo","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2243208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper maintenance of electro-medical devices is crucial for the quality of care to patients and the economic performance of healthcare organizations. This research aims to identify the interaction between Ultrasound scanners (US) maintenance variables as a function of maintenance indicators: US in service or decommissioned, excessive number of failures, and failure rate. Knowing those interactions, specific maintenance measures will be developed to improve the reliability of the US.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) method was eployed to analyze data from 222 US and their four-year maintenance history. Models were developed based on the variables with the greatest influence on maintenance indicators, where US were classified according to the associated risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US with more than one major failure or at least one major component replacement had up to 496.4% more failures than the average. Failure rate increased by up to 188.7% over the average for those US with more than three moderate failures, three replacements, or both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies and quantifies the causes of risk to establish a specific maintenance plan for US. It helps to better understand the degradation of US to optimize their operation and maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":" ","pages":"851-864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2243208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Proper maintenance of electro-medical devices is crucial for the quality of care to patients and the economic performance of healthcare organizations. This research aims to identify the interaction between Ultrasound scanners (US) maintenance variables as a function of maintenance indicators: US in service or decommissioned, excessive number of failures, and failure rate. Knowing those interactions, specific maintenance measures will be developed to improve the reliability of the US.
Research design and methods: Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) method was eployed to analyze data from 222 US and their four-year maintenance history. Models were developed based on the variables with the greatest influence on maintenance indicators, where US were classified according to the associated risk.
Results: US with more than one major failure or at least one major component replacement had up to 496.4% more failures than the average. Failure rate increased by up to 188.7% over the average for those US with more than three moderate failures, three replacements, or both.
Conclusions: This study identifies and quantifies the causes of risk to establish a specific maintenance plan for US. It helps to better understand the degradation of US to optimize their operation and maintenance.
期刊介绍:
The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections:
Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies
Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale
Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points
In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.