Steroids Provide Temporary Improvement of Refractory Pain Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurohospitalist Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1177/19418744231172350
Matthew N Jaffa, Jamie E Podell, Arshom Foroutan, Melissa Motta, Wan-Tsu W Chang, Jacob Cherian, Melissa B Pergakis, Gunjan Y Parikh, J Marc Simard, Michael J Armahizer, Neeraj Badjatia, Nicholas A Morris
{"title":"Steroids Provide Temporary Improvement of Refractory Pain Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"Matthew N Jaffa, Jamie E Podell, Arshom Foroutan, Melissa Motta, Wan-Tsu W Chang, Jacob Cherian, Melissa B Pergakis, Gunjan Y Parikh, J Marc Simard, Michael J Armahizer, Neeraj Badjatia, Nicholas A Morris","doi":"10.1177/19418744231172350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence for optimal analgesia following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is limited. Steroid therapy for pain refractory to standard regimens is common despite lack of evidence for its efficacy. We sought to determine if steroids reduced pain or utilization of other analgesics when given for refractory headache following SAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective within-subjects cohort study of SAH patients who received steroids for refractory headache. We compared daily pain scores, total daily opioid, and acetaminophen doses before, during, and after steroids. Repeated measures were analyzed with a multivariable general linear model and generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included 52 patients treated with dexamethasone following SAH, of whom 11 received a second course, increasing total to 63 treatment epochs. Mean pain score on the first day of therapy was 7.92 (standard error of the mean [SEM] .37) and decreased to 6.68 (SEM .36) on the second day before quickly returning to baseline levels, 7.36 (SEM .33), following completion of treatment. Total daily analgesics mirrored this trend. Mean total opioid and acetaminophen doses on days one and two and two days after treatment were 47.83mg (SEM 6.22) and 1848mg (SEM 170.66), 34.24mg (SEM 5.12) and 1809mg (SEM 150.28), and 46.38mg (SEM 11.64) and 1833mg (SEM 174.23), respectively. Response to therapy was associated with older age, decreasing acetaminophen dosing, and longer duration of steroids. Hyperglycemia and sleep disturbance/delirium effected 28.6% and 55.6% of cases, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Steroid therapy for refractory pain in SAH patients may have modest, transient effects in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744231172350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence for optimal analgesia following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is limited. Steroid therapy for pain refractory to standard regimens is common despite lack of evidence for its efficacy. We sought to determine if steroids reduced pain or utilization of other analgesics when given for refractory headache following SAH.

Methods: We performed a retrospective within-subjects cohort study of SAH patients who received steroids for refractory headache. We compared daily pain scores, total daily opioid, and acetaminophen doses before, during, and after steroids. Repeated measures were analyzed with a multivariable general linear model and generalized estimating equations.

Results: Included 52 patients treated with dexamethasone following SAH, of whom 11 received a second course, increasing total to 63 treatment epochs. Mean pain score on the first day of therapy was 7.92 (standard error of the mean [SEM] .37) and decreased to 6.68 (SEM .36) on the second day before quickly returning to baseline levels, 7.36 (SEM .33), following completion of treatment. Total daily analgesics mirrored this trend. Mean total opioid and acetaminophen doses on days one and two and two days after treatment were 47.83mg (SEM 6.22) and 1848mg (SEM 170.66), 34.24mg (SEM 5.12) and 1809mg (SEM 150.28), and 46.38mg (SEM 11.64) and 1833mg (SEM 174.23), respectively. Response to therapy was associated with older age, decreasing acetaminophen dosing, and longer duration of steroids. Hyperglycemia and sleep disturbance/delirium effected 28.6% and 55.6% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion: Steroid therapy for refractory pain in SAH patients may have modest, transient effects in select patients.

类固醇能暂时改善蛛网膜下腔出血后的难治性疼痛
简介:蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后最佳镇痛的证据有限。尽管缺乏证据证明类固醇的疗效,但类固醇治疗标准方案难治性疼痛的方法却很常见。我们试图确定类固醇在治疗 SAH 后的难治性头痛时是否会减轻疼痛或减少使用其他镇痛药:我们对接受类固醇治疗难治性头痛的 SAH 患者进行了一项回顾性受试者内队列研究。我们比较了类固醇治疗前、治疗中和治疗后的每日疼痛评分、每日阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚的总剂量。采用多变量一般线性模型和广义估计方程对重复测量进行分析:纳入了52例SAH后接受地塞米松治疗的患者,其中11例接受了第二个疗程的治疗,总治疗次数增加到63次。治疗第一天的平均疼痛评分为 7.92(平均值标准误差 [SEM] .37),第二天降至 6.68(平均值标准误差 [SEM] .36),治疗结束后迅速恢复到基线水平,即 7.36(平均值标准误差 [SEM] .33)。每日镇痛药总量也反映了这一趋势。第一天和第二天以及治疗后两天的阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚平均总剂量分别为 47.83 毫克(SEM 6.22)和 1848 毫克(SEM 170.66),34.24 毫克(SEM 5.12)和 1809 毫克(SEM 150.28),以及 46.38 毫克(SEM 11.64)和 1833 毫克(SEM 174.23)。治疗反应与年龄较大、对乙酰氨基酚用量减少和类固醇用药时间较长有关。高血糖和睡眠障碍/谵妄分别影响了28.6%和55.6%的病例:结论:类固醇治疗 SAH 患者的难治性疼痛可能会对部分患者产生短暂的适度影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信