Quantification of Portal Vein Vascularization Using an Automated Post-Processing Video Analysis Tool.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Valentin Blank, Maria Heni, Thomas Karlas
{"title":"Quantification of Portal Vein Vascularization Using an Automated Post-Processing Video Analysis Tool.","authors":"Valentin Blank,&nbsp;Maria Heni,&nbsp;Thomas Karlas","doi":"10.1055/a-1999-7818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Blood flow dynamics represent a diagnostic criterion for many diseases. However, no established reference standard is available. In clinical practice, ultrasound pulsed-wave Doppler (PW-Doppler) is frequently used to assess visceral blood flow, despite its well-known limitations. A quantitative analysis of conventional color Doppler patterns can be performed using an innovative ultrasound-based algorithm (pixel flow analysis, PFA). This tool already shows promising results in obstetrics, but the technique has not yet been evaluated for portal venous blood flow assessment. <b>Methods</b> This prospective exploratory research study evaluated the applicability of PFA in the portal venous system. Measurements of portal venous flow using PFA and PW-Doppler were compared in healthy volunteers (n=20) and in patients with hepatic steatosis (n=10) and liver cirrhosis (n=10). <b>Results</b> In healthy volunteers (60% female, mean age 23 years, BMI 21.5 kg/m <sup>2</sup> [20.4-23.8]), PFA and PW-Doppler showed a strong positive correlation in fasting conditions (r=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-0.87), recording a median blood flow of 834 ml/min (624-1066) and 718 ml/min (620-811), respectively. PFA was also applicable in patients with chronic liver diseases (55% female, age 65 years (55-72); BMI 27.8 kg/m <sup>2</sup> (25.4-30.8)), but the correlation between PFA and PW-Doppler was poor (r=- 0.09) in the subgroup with steatosis. A better correlation (r=0.61) was observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. <b>Conclusion</b> PFA and PW-Doppler assessment of portal venous vascularization showed high agreement in healthy volunteers and patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, PFA represents a possible alternative to conventional PW-Doppler sonography for visceral blood flow diagnostics and merits further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"E2-E10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/9c/10-1055-a-1999-7818.PMC10027440.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1999-7818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Blood flow dynamics represent a diagnostic criterion for many diseases. However, no established reference standard is available. In clinical practice, ultrasound pulsed-wave Doppler (PW-Doppler) is frequently used to assess visceral blood flow, despite its well-known limitations. A quantitative analysis of conventional color Doppler patterns can be performed using an innovative ultrasound-based algorithm (pixel flow analysis, PFA). This tool already shows promising results in obstetrics, but the technique has not yet been evaluated for portal venous blood flow assessment. Methods This prospective exploratory research study evaluated the applicability of PFA in the portal venous system. Measurements of portal venous flow using PFA and PW-Doppler were compared in healthy volunteers (n=20) and in patients with hepatic steatosis (n=10) and liver cirrhosis (n=10). Results In healthy volunteers (60% female, mean age 23 years, BMI 21.5 kg/m 2 [20.4-23.8]), PFA and PW-Doppler showed a strong positive correlation in fasting conditions (r=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-0.87), recording a median blood flow of 834 ml/min (624-1066) and 718 ml/min (620-811), respectively. PFA was also applicable in patients with chronic liver diseases (55% female, age 65 years (55-72); BMI 27.8 kg/m 2 (25.4-30.8)), but the correlation between PFA and PW-Doppler was poor (r=- 0.09) in the subgroup with steatosis. A better correlation (r=0.61) was observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. Conclusion PFA and PW-Doppler assessment of portal venous vascularization showed high agreement in healthy volunteers and patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, PFA represents a possible alternative to conventional PW-Doppler sonography for visceral blood flow diagnostics and merits further evaluation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用自动后处理视频分析工具定量门静脉血管化。
目的血流动力学是许多疾病的诊断标准。然而,没有既定的参考标准。在临床实践中,超声脉冲波多普勒(PW-Doppler)经常用于评估内脏血流,尽管它众所周知的局限性。传统彩色多普勒模式的定量分析可以使用一种创新的基于超声的算法(像素流分析,PFA)进行。该工具已经在产科中显示出有希望的结果,但该技术尚未用于门静脉血流量评估。方法本前瞻性探索性研究评价PFA在门静脉系统中的适用性。我们比较了健康志愿者(n=20)和肝脂肪变性患者(n=10)和肝硬化患者(n=10)使用PFA和PW-Doppler测量门静脉流量的情况。结果在健康志愿者(60%为女性,平均年龄23岁,BMI 21.5 kg/ m2[20.4-23.8])中,PFA和PW-Doppler在空腹状态下呈强正相关(r=0.69;95% CI 0.36-0.87),记录中位血流量分别为834 ml/min(624-1066)和718 ml/min(620-811)。PFA也适用于慢性肝病患者(55%为女性,65岁(55-72岁);BMI 27.8 kg/ m2(25.4-30.8)),但脂肪变性亚组PFA和PW-Doppler相关性较差(r=- 0.09)。肝硬化患者的相关性更好(r=0.61)。结论PFA和pw -多普勒评价门静脉血管化在健康志愿者和肝硬化患者中具有较高的一致性。因此,PFA代表了常规pw -多普勒超声诊断内脏血流的可能替代方案,值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信