Stem cell markers: A guide to neoadjuvant therapy in breast carcinomas.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Zuhal Gucin, Nur Buyukpinarbasili, Melin Ozgun Gecer, Yeliz Emine Ersoy, Haci Mehmet Turk, Seyma Yildiz, Direnc Ozlem Aksoy
{"title":"Stem cell markers: A guide to neoadjuvant therapy in breast carcinomas.","authors":"Zuhal Gucin,&nbsp;Nur Buyukpinarbasili,&nbsp;Melin Ozgun Gecer,&nbsp;Yeliz Emine Ersoy,&nbsp;Haci Mehmet Turk,&nbsp;Seyma Yildiz,&nbsp;Direnc Ozlem Aksoy","doi":"10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_1274_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to investigate potential associations between the stem cell population and the degree of tumor regression in breast carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The study included 92 patients with breast carcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy. Tumor regression was defined based on Miller and Payne grading system. Patients with grade 1 or 2 regression on a 5-point scale were included in group 1 (n = 37), grade 3 regression in group 2 (n = 32), and grade 4 or 5 regression in group 3 (n = 23).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Immunohistochemical staining was performed on paraffin block sections of every case using CD44, CD24, CD29, CD133, ID4, and ALDH1 antibodies to detect stem cells.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software was used for statistical analyses, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histologically high-grade tumors are more common in the near-complete/complete response group (P = 0.004). HER2-positive tumors were more common in the complete/near-complete response group (P = 0.054). Tumor cells positive for stem cell markers CD44 and CD24 were more common in the poor response group (P = 0.027 and P = 0.001, respectively). CD29 expression was reduced in the posttreatment residual tumor tissue in the near-complete/complete response group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High CD44 and CD24 expression may be a predictor of poor response/nonresponse to neoadjuvant therapy in breast carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, stem cells have been defined as the main cell population responsible for resistance to anticancer therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13488,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology","volume":"66 3","pages":"495-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_1274_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to investigate potential associations between the stem cell population and the degree of tumor regression in breast carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Settings and design: The study included 92 patients with breast carcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy. Tumor regression was defined based on Miller and Payne grading system. Patients with grade 1 or 2 regression on a 5-point scale were included in group 1 (n = 37), grade 3 regression in group 2 (n = 32), and grade 4 or 5 regression in group 3 (n = 23).

Materials and methods: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on paraffin block sections of every case using CD44, CD24, CD29, CD133, ID4, and ALDH1 antibodies to detect stem cells.

Statistical analysis used: IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software was used for statistical analyses, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Histologically high-grade tumors are more common in the near-complete/complete response group (P = 0.004). HER2-positive tumors were more common in the complete/near-complete response group (P = 0.054). Tumor cells positive for stem cell markers CD44 and CD24 were more common in the poor response group (P = 0.027 and P = 0.001, respectively). CD29 expression was reduced in the posttreatment residual tumor tissue in the near-complete/complete response group.

Conclusion: High CD44 and CD24 expression may be a predictor of poor response/nonresponse to neoadjuvant therapy in breast carcinomas.

Background: In recent years, stem cells have been defined as the main cell population responsible for resistance to anticancer therapies.

干细胞标志物:乳腺癌新辅助治疗指南。
目的:本研究旨在探讨新辅助治疗乳腺癌中干细胞群体与肿瘤消退程度之间的潜在关联。设置和设计:该研究包括92名接受新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者。肿瘤回归是基于Miller和Payne分级系统定义的。1组(n=37)为1级或2级回归患者,2组(n=32)为3级回归患者;3组(n=23)为4级或5级回归患者。材料和方法:使用CD44、CD24、CD29、CD133、ID4和ALDH1抗体对每个病例的石蜡切片进行免疫组化染色,以检测干细胞。使用的统计分析:使用IBM社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)23.0版(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,USA)软件进行统计分析,P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:组织学分级肿瘤在接近完全/完全反应组中更常见(P=0.004)。HER2阳性肿瘤在完全/接近完全反应组更常见(P=0.054)。干细胞标志物CD44和CD24阳性的肿瘤细胞在反应差组中更普遍(分别为P=0.027和P=0.001)。在接近完全/完全应答组中,治疗后残留肿瘤组织中CD29的表达降低。结论:CD44和CD24的高表达可能预示着乳腺癌对新辅助治疗的不良反应/无反应。背景:近年来,干细胞被定义为对抗癌疗法产生耐药性的主要细胞群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
422
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to pathology including morbid anatomy, surgical pathology, clinical pathology, diagnostic cytopathology including gynecologic cytology and aspiration cytology, hematology including immuno-hematology and medical microbiology. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, letters to the editor and brief communications. Review articles on current topics usually are invited by the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信