Zirconia Implants Produced by Additive Manufacturing - A Scoping Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2513Kreve11

S Kreve, I Ferreira, A C Dos Reis

{"title":"Zirconia Implants Produced by Additive Manufacturing - A Scoping Review.","authors":"S Kreve, I Ferreira, A C Dos Reis","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2513Kreve11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Additive manufacturing is a tool with potential use in medicine and dentistry. The manufacture of metals and composites is already advanced, however, concerns about titanium hypersensitivity, tissue staining, and corrosion caused by gradual material degradation encourage research into more biocompatible alternatives.Objective: This systematic scoping review aimed to gather studies that evaluated zirconia implants produced by additive manufacturing to describe the current stage of the printing technique and the final product.Methods: Searches in Embase, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were enriched with manual searches between February and March 2021 and updated in June 2022 using keywords: zirconium implants, zirconium oxide, additive manufacturing, rapid prototyping, 3D printing, selective laser melting, and electron beam melting. The criteria included studies that evaluated or described zirconia implants obtained by 3D printing, with a direct relationship to dentistry or orthopedics.Results: The database search resulted in 671 articles. Eight articles were selected for full reading and remained in this systematic review.Conclusion: The printing technique for zirconia implants is promising. However, further studies are required before implants produced by the printing technique can be tested clinically. The literature with results regarding the impression product is still limited.","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2513Kreve11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Additive manufacturing is a tool with potential use in medicine and dentistry. The manufacture of metals and composites is already advanced, however, concerns about titanium hypersensitivity, tissue staining, and corrosion caused by gradual material degradation encourage research into more biocompatible alternatives.

Objective: This systematic scoping review aimed to gather studies that evaluated zirconia implants produced by additive manufacturing to describe the current stage of the printing technique and the final product.

Methods: Searches in Embase, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were enriched with manual searches between February and March 2021 and updated in June 2022 using keywords: zirconium implants, zirconium oxide, additive manufacturing, rapid prototyping, 3D printing, selective laser melting, and electron beam melting. The criteria included studies that evaluated or described zirconia implants obtained by 3D printing, with a direct relationship to dentistry or orthopedics.

Results: The database search resulted in 671 articles. Eight articles were selected for full reading and remained in this systematic review.

Conclusion: The printing technique for zirconia implants is promising. However, further studies are required before implants produced by the printing technique can be tested clinically. The literature with results regarding the impression product is still limited.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用增材制造技术生产氧化锆假体--范围审查。

简介快速成型技术是一种可用于医学和牙科的工具。金属和复合材料的制造技术已经非常先进，然而，由于人们对钛的过敏性、组织染色以及材料逐渐降解造成的腐蚀等问题的担忧，促使人们研究生物相容性更好的替代品：本系统性范围界定综述旨在收集通过增材制造技术生产氧化锆植入物的评估研究，以描述现阶段的打印技术和最终产品：在 2021 年 2 月至 3 月期间，通过人工检索对 Embase、PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行了搜索，并于 2022 年 6 月进行了更新，使用的关键词包括：锆植入物、氧化锆、快速成型制造、快速原型、3D 打印、选择性激光熔化和电子束熔化。标准包括评估或描述通过三维打印技术获得的氧化锆植入物的研究，这些研究与牙科或整形外科有直接关系：结果：数据库搜索结果为 671 篇文章。结果：通过数据库搜索，共获得 671 篇文章，其中 8 篇文章被选中进行全文阅读，并保留在本系统综述中：结论：氧化锆种植体的打印技术前景广阔。结论：氧化锆种植体的打印技术前景广阔，但在对打印技术生产的种植体进行临床测试之前，还需要进一步的研究。有关印模产品结果的文献仍然有限。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.