Osteoporosis Feature Selection and Risk Prediction Model by Machine Learning Using a Cross-Sectional Database.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Bone Metabolism Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.11005/jbm.2023.30.3.263
Yonghan Cha, Sung Hyo Seo, Jung-Taek Kim, Jin-Woo Kim, Sang-Yeob Lee, Jun-Il Yoo
{"title":"Osteoporosis Feature Selection and Risk Prediction Model by Machine Learning Using a Cross-Sectional Database.","authors":"Yonghan Cha,&nbsp;Sung Hyo Seo,&nbsp;Jung-Taek Kim,&nbsp;Jin-Woo Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Yeob Lee,&nbsp;Jun-Il Yoo","doi":"10.11005/jbm.2023.30.3.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy and validity of using machine learning (ML) to select risk factors, to discriminate differences in feature selection by ML between men and women, and to develop predictive models for patients with osteoporosis in a big database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data on 968 observed features from a total of 3,484 the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants were collected. To find preliminary features that were well-related to osteoporosis, logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, and support vector machine were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In osteoporosis feature selection by 5 ML models in this study, the most selected variables as risk factors in men and women were body mass index, monthly alcohol consumption, and dietary surveys. However, differences between men and women in osteoporosis feature selection by ML models were age, smoking, and blood glucose level. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve for each ML model was not significantly different for either gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML performed a feature selection of osteoporosis, considering hidden differences between men and women. The present study considers the preprocessing of input data and the feature selection process as well as the ML technique to be important factors for the accuracy of the osteoporosis prediction model.</p>","PeriodicalId":15070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","volume":"30 3","pages":"263-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/12/jbm-2023-30-3-263.PMC10509024.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2023.30.3.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy and validity of using machine learning (ML) to select risk factors, to discriminate differences in feature selection by ML between men and women, and to develop predictive models for patients with osteoporosis in a big database.

Methods: The data on 968 observed features from a total of 3,484 the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants were collected. To find preliminary features that were well-related to osteoporosis, logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, and support vector machine were used.

Results: In osteoporosis feature selection by 5 ML models in this study, the most selected variables as risk factors in men and women were body mass index, monthly alcohol consumption, and dietary surveys. However, differences between men and women in osteoporosis feature selection by ML models were age, smoking, and blood glucose level. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve for each ML model was not significantly different for either gender.

Conclusions: ML performed a feature selection of osteoporosis, considering hidden differences between men and women. The present study considers the preprocessing of input data and the feature selection process as well as the ML technique to be important factors for the accuracy of the osteoporosis prediction model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用横断面数据库的机器学习骨质疏松症特征选择和风险预测模型。
背景:本研究的目的是验证使用机器学习(ML)选择风险因素的准确性和有效性,区分男性和女性在特征选择方面的差异,并在大型数据库中开发骨质疏松症患者的预测模型。方法:收集3484名韩国国民健康和营养检查调查参与者的968个观察特征的数据。为了找到与骨质疏松症密切相关的初步特征,使用了逻辑回归、随机森林、梯度增强、自适应增强和支持向量机。结果:在本研究中,通过5 ML模型选择骨质疏松症特征时,作为男性和女性风险因素的最多选择变量是体重指数、每月饮酒量和饮食调查。然而,ML模型在骨质疏松症特征选择方面的男性和女性差异在于年龄、吸烟和血糖水平。受试者操作特征(ROC)分析显示,每种ML模型的ROC曲线下面积对任何性别都没有显著差异。结论:ML对骨质疏松症进行了特征选择,考虑到男性和女性之间的隐性差异。本研究认为,输入数据的预处理、特征选择过程以及ML技术是影响骨质疏松症预测模型准确性的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Journal of Bone Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信