Quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-18 DOI:10.2217/pmt-2023-0033
Abdul S Alvi, Jamal A Nasir, Muhammad A Nizam, Muhammad M Hamdani, Nabeel A Bhangar, Syed A Sibtain, Ali S Lalani, Michiel C Warlé
{"title":"Quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdul S Alvi,&nbsp;Jamal A Nasir,&nbsp;Muhammad A Nizam,&nbsp;Muhammad M Hamdani,&nbsp;Nabeel A Bhangar,&nbsp;Syed A Sibtain,&nbsp;Ali S Lalani,&nbsp;Michiel C Warlé","doi":"10.2217/pmt-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To study the efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) in laparoscopic nephrectomy patients. <b>Materials & methods:</b> We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for QLB and/or TAP technique compared with each other or a control. <b>Results:</b> Direct analysis of 24 h post-op pain score at rest for each compared with control showed significant reduction, QLB (mean differences [MD] [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.87,-0.36]; p = 0.004) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.36 [-0.59, -0.12]; p = 0.003). With movement both were respectively lower than control QLB (MD [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.51, -0.72]; p = <0.0001) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.50 [-0.95, -0.05]; p = 0.03). Moreover, QLB demonstrated less risk 24 h of post-op nausea vomiting (PONV) versus control (PONV; risk ratios [RR] [95% CI]: 0.64 [0.45,0.90]; p = 0.01). <b>Conclusion:</b> TAP and QLB reduce pain scores compared with control, whereas only QLB reduces PONV compared with control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"555-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To study the efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) in laparoscopic nephrectomy patients. Materials & methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for QLB and/or TAP technique compared with each other or a control. Results: Direct analysis of 24 h post-op pain score at rest for each compared with control showed significant reduction, QLB (mean differences [MD] [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.87,-0.36]; p = 0.004) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.36 [-0.59, -0.12]; p = 0.003). With movement both were respectively lower than control QLB (MD [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.51, -0.72]; p = <0.0001) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.50 [-0.95, -0.05]; p = 0.03). Moreover, QLB demonstrated less risk 24 h of post-op nausea vomiting (PONV) versus control (PONV; risk ratios [RR] [95% CI]: 0.64 [0.45,0.90]; p = 0.01). Conclusion: TAP and QLB reduce pain scores compared with control, whereas only QLB reduces PONV compared with control.

腹腔镜肾切除术中腰方肌阻滞和腹横面阻滞:一项荟萃分析。
目的:探讨腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和腹横肌平面(TAP)在腹腔镜肾切除术中的疗效。材料与方法:我们对QLB和/或TAP技术的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,并将其与其他或对照进行了比较。结果:与对照组相比,每个患者术后24小时休息时的疼痛评分的直接分析显示显著降低,QLB(平均差异[MD][95%CI]:-1.12[-1.87,-0.36];p=0.004)和TAP(MD[95%CI]:-0.36[-0.59,0.12];p=0.003)。随着运动,两者分别低于对照组QLB(MD[95%CI]:-1.12/-1.51,0.72];p=结论:与对照组相比,TAP和QLB可降低疼痛评分,而只有QLB可减少PONV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信