A retrospective observational study of telehealth utilisation for mental health consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practices.

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Judith Thomas, Gorken Sezgin, Precious McGuire, Rae-Anne Hardie, Guilherme S Franco, Margaret Williamson, Andrew Georgiou
{"title":"A retrospective observational study of telehealth utilisation for mental health consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practices.","authors":"Judith Thomas,&nbsp;Gorken Sezgin,&nbsp;Precious McGuire,&nbsp;Rae-Anne Hardie,&nbsp;Guilherme S Franco,&nbsp;Margaret Williamson,&nbsp;Andrew Georgiou","doi":"10.17061/phrpp3332322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25-29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20-24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrpp3332322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type.

Study type: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: We used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: The study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25-29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20-24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video.

Conclusions: This study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间澳大利亚全科医生利用远程医疗进行心理健康咨询的回顾性观察研究
研究的目的和重要性:尽管在大流行期间进行了大量的心理健康研究,但探索心理健康对澳大利亚全科医生的影响的证据有限。本研究调查了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间澳大利亚全科医生利用远程医疗进行心理健康咨询的情况。目标是:1)确定2020年3月至2021年11月期间通过远程保健提供的精神卫生服务的比例;2)确定最常通过远程保健提供的心理健康咨询类型;3)建立远程心理健康会诊患者的社会人口学特征模型,包括会诊类型。研究类型:回顾性观察研究。方法:我们使用医疗保险福利计划服务项目编号来区分去识别的电子全科医生数据中的心理健康咨询。我们按州和咨询类型对面对面、视频和电话心理健康咨询的比例进行了分层。我们使用两个混合效应逻辑模型来评估i)远程医疗(视频/电话)与面对面咨询和ii)视频与电话咨询的可能性差异;根据社会人口特征。结果:本研究包括874 249次心理健康咨询。远程医疗使用在2020年7月和2021年8月分别在维多利亚州(61.6%)和新南威尔士州(52.5%)达到峰值。远程医疗的使用在2021年全年继续进行,从2021年7月起,这两个州的视频咨询都有所增加。从2021年7月起,通过电话咨询心理健康治疗计划的比例有所下降,同时视频咨询的比例有所增加。在维多利亚州、区域/偏远地区和2020年期间,女性更有可能使用远程保健。与心理健康咨询相比,视频比电话更有可能用于心理健康治疗计划/审查。与25-29岁的人相比,20-24岁的人最有可能使用视频,80岁及以上的人最少使用视频。在比较电话和视频时,没有证据表明存在性别差异。结论:本研究全面了解了在大流行的头21个月期间,远程医疗在提供心理健康咨询方面发挥的重要作用,包括利用远程医疗的患者的社会人口统计数据。研究结果可协助全科医生规划未来通过远程保健提供精神卫生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信