Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2023-08-10 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1162/imag_a_00005
John P Grogan, Wouter Rys, Simon P Kelly, Redmond G O'Connell
{"title":"Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics.","authors":"John P Grogan,&nbsp;Wouter Rys,&nbsp;Simon P Kelly,&nbsp;Redmond G O'Connell","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well established that one's confidence in a choice can be influenced by new evidence encountered after commitment has been reached, but the processes through which post-choice evidence is sampled remain unclear. To investigate this, we traced the pre- and post-choice dynamics of electrophysiological signatures of evidence accumulation (Centro-parietal Positivity, CPP) and motor preparation (mu/beta band) to determine their sensitivity to participants' confidence in their perceptual discriminations. Pre-choice CPP amplitudes scaled with confidence both when confidence was reported simultaneously with choice, and when reported 1 second after the initial direction decision with no intervening evidence. When additional evidence was presented during the post-choice delay period, the CPP exhibited sustained activation after the initial choice, with a more prolonged build-up on trials with lower certainty in the alternative that was finally endorsed, irrespective of whether this entailed a change-of-mind from the initial choice or not. Further investigation established that this pattern was accompanied by later lateralisation of motor preparation signals toward the ultimately chosen response and slower confidence reports when participants indicated low certainty in this response. These observations are consistent with certainty-dependent stopping theories according to which post-choice evidence accumulation ceases when a criterion level of certainty in a choice alternative has been reached, but continues otherwise. Our findings have implications for current models of choice confidence, and predictions they may make about EEG signatures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73341,"journal":{"name":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"1 ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/30/imag-1-00005.PMC10503486.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It is well established that one's confidence in a choice can be influenced by new evidence encountered after commitment has been reached, but the processes through which post-choice evidence is sampled remain unclear. To investigate this, we traced the pre- and post-choice dynamics of electrophysiological signatures of evidence accumulation (Centro-parietal Positivity, CPP) and motor preparation (mu/beta band) to determine their sensitivity to participants' confidence in their perceptual discriminations. Pre-choice CPP amplitudes scaled with confidence both when confidence was reported simultaneously with choice, and when reported 1 second after the initial direction decision with no intervening evidence. When additional evidence was presented during the post-choice delay period, the CPP exhibited sustained activation after the initial choice, with a more prolonged build-up on trials with lower certainty in the alternative that was finally endorsed, irrespective of whether this entailed a change-of-mind from the initial choice or not. Further investigation established that this pattern was accompanied by later lateralisation of motor preparation signals toward the ultimately chosen response and slower confidence reports when participants indicated low certainty in this response. These observations are consistent with certainty-dependent stopping theories according to which post-choice evidence accumulation ceases when a criterion level of certainty in a choice alternative has been reached, but continues otherwise. Our findings have implications for current models of choice confidence, and predictions they may make about EEG signatures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

置信度是通过选择前和选择后的决策信号动力学来预测的。
众所周知,一个人对选择的信心可能会受到达成承诺后遇到的新证据的影响,但对选择后证据进行抽样的过程仍不清楚。为了研究这一点,我们追踪了证据积累(中央-顶叶阳性,CPP)和运动准备(μ/β带)的电生理特征的选择前和选择后动力学,以确定它们对参与者对其感知辨别的信心的敏感性。无论是在选择的同时报告置信度时,还是在没有干预证据的情况下,在初始方向决定后1秒报告时,选择前CPP振幅都随置信度缩放。当在选择后的延迟期内提供额外证据时,CPP在最初的选择后表现出持续的激活,在试验中积累的时间更长,最终批准的替代方案的确定性更低,无论这是否意味着从最初的选择中改变主意。进一步的研究证实,这种模式伴随着运动准备信号向最终选择的反应的后期偏侧,当参与者表示这种反应的确定性较低时,置信度报告较慢。这些观察结果与确定性相关的停止理论一致,根据该理论,当选择备选方案中的确定性达到标准水平时,选择后证据积累停止,但在其他情况下继续。我们的发现对当前的选择置信度模型以及他们可能对脑电图特征做出的预测具有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信