Cough medicines for children- time for a reality check

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Gene Clark , Dominic A. Fitzgerald , Bruce K. Rubin
{"title":"Cough medicines for children- time for a reality check","authors":"Gene Clark ,&nbsp;Dominic A. Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Bruce K. Rubin","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2023.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Cough medicines have been in use for over a century to treat the common and troublesome, but often helpful, symptoms of cough in children. They contain various combinations of “anti-tussive” drugs including opioids, antihistamines, </span>herbal preparations<span><span>, mucolytics<span>, decongestants and </span></span>expectorants. Whilst theoretically attractive for symptom relief when children are suffering, as time has passed these popular </span></span>over the counter medicines<span> have been shown to lack efficacy, delay more serious underlying diagnoses, and can cause complications and sometimes death. This has resulted in clinician concerns, a citizen petition to the American Food and Drug Association in 2007, some self-regulation from manufacturers and escalating restrictions on their use from regulatory agencies across the world over the last twenty years. This article will review the protective role of cough, juxtapose the conflicting treatment goals of suppressing a dry cough and promoting expectoration for a wet cough, consider the evidence basis for prescribing cough medicines in comparison to other more specific treatments such as for asthma [beta agonists] or infection [antibiotics], regulatory interventions, and conclude with the view that over counter cough medicines should not be used in children, especially young children.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526054223000477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cough medicines have been in use for over a century to treat the common and troublesome, but often helpful, symptoms of cough in children. They contain various combinations of “anti-tussive” drugs including opioids, antihistamines, herbal preparations, mucolytics, decongestants and expectorants. Whilst theoretically attractive for symptom relief when children are suffering, as time has passed these popular over the counter medicines have been shown to lack efficacy, delay more serious underlying diagnoses, and can cause complications and sometimes death. This has resulted in clinician concerns, a citizen petition to the American Food and Drug Association in 2007, some self-regulation from manufacturers and escalating restrictions on their use from regulatory agencies across the world over the last twenty years. This article will review the protective role of cough, juxtapose the conflicting treatment goals of suppressing a dry cough and promoting expectoration for a wet cough, consider the evidence basis for prescribing cough medicines in comparison to other more specific treatments such as for asthma [beta agonists] or infection [antibiotics], regulatory interventions, and conclude with the view that over counter cough medicines should not be used in children, especially young children.

儿童止咳药--是时候对现实进行检查了
一个多世纪以来,止咳药一直被用来治疗儿童常见的、麻烦的咳嗽症状,但往往很有帮助。它们包含各种 "止咳 "药物组合,包括阿片类药物、抗组胺药、草药制剂、粘液溶解剂、减充血剂和祛痰剂。虽然理论上这些常用非处方药在缓解儿童症状方面很有吸引力,但随着时间的推移,这些药物已被证明缺乏疗效,会延误更严重的潜在诊断,并可能引起并发症,有时甚至导致死亡。这引起了临床医生的关注,2007 年公民向美国食品与药品协会提出请愿,生产商进行了一些自律,过去二十年来,世界各地的监管机构对其使用的限制也在不断升级。本文将回顾咳嗽的保护作用,将抑制干咳和促进湿咳祛痰这两个相互冲突的治疗目标并列起来,考虑处方止咳药的证据基础,并与其他更具针对性的治疗(如治疗哮喘[β受体激动剂]或感染[抗生素])、监管干预措施进行比较,最后得出结论:儿童,尤其是幼儿,不应使用非处方止咳药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal. Subjects covered include: • Epidemiology • Immunology and cell biology • Physiology • Occupational disorders • The role of allergens and pollutants A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners. It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信