Impact of Apps as Assistive Devices for Visually Impaired Persons.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Shrinivas Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Gang Luo
{"title":"Impact of Apps as Assistive Devices for Visually Impaired Persons.","authors":"Shrinivas Pundlik,&nbsp;Prerana Shivshanker,&nbsp;Gang Luo","doi":"10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pervasiveness of mobile devices and other associated technologies has affected all aspects of our daily lives. People with visual impairments are no exception, as they increasingly tend to rely on mobile apps for assistance with various visual tasks in daily life. Compared to dedicated visual aids, mobile apps offer advantages such as affordability, versatility, portability, and ubiquity. We have surveyed hundreds of mobile apps of potential interest to people with vision impairments, either released as special assistive apps claiming to help in tasks such as text or object recognition (<i>n</i> = 68), digital accessibility (<i>n</i> = 84), navigation (<i>n</i> = 44), and remote sighted service (<i>n</i> = 4), among others, or marketed as general camera magnification apps that can be used for visual assistance (<i>n</i> = 77). While assistive apps as a whole received positive feedback from visually impaired users, as reported in various studies, evaluations of the usability of every app were typically limited to user reviews, which are often not scientifically informative. Rigorous evaluation studies on the effect of vision assistance apps on daily task performance and quality of life are relatively rare. Moreover, evaluation criteria are difficult to establish, given the heterogeneity of the visual tasks and visual needs of the users. In addition to surveying literature on vision assistance apps, this review discusses the feasibility and necessity of conducting scientific research to understand visual needs and methods to evaluate real-world benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48658,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Vision Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"111-130"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The pervasiveness of mobile devices and other associated technologies has affected all aspects of our daily lives. People with visual impairments are no exception, as they increasingly tend to rely on mobile apps for assistance with various visual tasks in daily life. Compared to dedicated visual aids, mobile apps offer advantages such as affordability, versatility, portability, and ubiquity. We have surveyed hundreds of mobile apps of potential interest to people with vision impairments, either released as special assistive apps claiming to help in tasks such as text or object recognition (n = 68), digital accessibility (n = 84), navigation (n = 44), and remote sighted service (n = 4), among others, or marketed as general camera magnification apps that can be used for visual assistance (n = 77). While assistive apps as a whole received positive feedback from visually impaired users, as reported in various studies, evaluations of the usability of every app were typically limited to user reviews, which are often not scientifically informative. Rigorous evaluation studies on the effect of vision assistance apps on daily task performance and quality of life are relatively rare. Moreover, evaluation criteria are difficult to establish, given the heterogeneity of the visual tasks and visual needs of the users. In addition to surveying literature on vision assistance apps, this review discusses the feasibility and necessity of conducting scientific research to understand visual needs and methods to evaluate real-world benefits.

应用程序作为视障人士辅助设备的影响。
移动设备和其他相关技术的普及影响了我们日常生活的方方面面。视力障碍者也不例外,因为他们在日常生活中越来越倾向于依靠移动应用程序来完成各种视觉任务。与专用视觉辅助工具相比,移动应用程序具有价格实惠、通用性、便携性和普遍性等优势。我们调查了数百款视力障碍者可能感兴趣的移动应用程序,它们要么是作为特殊的辅助应用程序发布的,声称有助于完成文本或物体识别(n=68)、数字无障碍(n=84)、导航(n=44)和远程视觉服务(n=4)等任务,或作为可用于视觉辅助的通用相机放大应用程序销售(n=77)。尽管辅助应用程序作为一个整体从视障用户那里得到了积极的反馈,正如各种研究所报道的那样,但对每个应用程序可用性的评估通常仅限于用户评论,而用户评论往往没有科学信息。关于视觉辅助应用程序对日常任务表现和生活质量影响的严格评估研究相对较少。此外,考虑到视觉任务和用户视觉需求的异质性,评估标准很难建立。除了调查视觉辅助应用程序的文献外,这篇综述还讨论了进行科学研究以了解视觉需求的可行性和必要性,以及评估现实世界效益的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Vision Science
Annual Review of Vision Science Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Vision Science reviews progress in the visual sciences, a cross-cutting set of disciplines which intersect psychology, neuroscience, computer science, cell biology and genetics, and clinical medicine. The journal covers a broad range of topics and techniques, including optics, retina, central visual processing, visual perception, eye movements, visual development, vision models, computer vision, and the mechanisms of visual disease, dysfunction, and sight restoration. The study of vision is central to progress in many areas of science, and this new journal will explore and expose the connections that link it to biology, behavior, computation, engineering, and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信