[Understanding the mode of transmission of malaria agents: an astonishing series of hypotheses, observations, research and controversy].

François Rodhain
{"title":"[Understanding the mode of transmission of malaria agents: an astonishing series of hypotheses, observations, research and controversy].","authors":"François Rodhain","doi":"10.48327/mtsi.v3i1.2023.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1880, Laveran observed the causative agent of malaria. As early as 1884, he considered that mosquitoes could be responsible for the transmission of haematozoa, a hypothesis which resulted from the observation and reflection of an informed hygienist. But, as Laveran himself said, \"the opinion that I defended was considered by most observers to be highly unlikely\".Nearly 15 years after the discovery of the haematozoan, the elucidation of the mechanism of transmission still proved difficult to establish. A link with the existence of swamps had been established a long time before, but the true mode of transmission remained a mystery until the end of the 19th century. The implication, by Manson in 1877, of mosquitoes in the cycle of the Bancroftian filaria, then other observations of the same order, ended up attracting the attention of malariologists. Laveran himself was quickly convinced of the role of mosquitoes in carrying out the natural cycle and propagating <i>Plasmodium</i>, but this theory had as many detractors as supporters.In 1897, Ross showed the presence of oocysts on the stomach of mosquitoes previously gorged on a malaria patient, then in 1898, of sporozoites of bird plasmodia in mosquitoes. He was convinced that, through their bite, these insects were responsible for the transmission of human malaria agents, without being able to prove it. The results obtained by Ross were immediately confirmed in Italy by Grassi and his collaborators who, in November 1898, described the stages of <i>Plasmodium</i> in man and, through various experiments carried out in collaboration with British researchers, showed the role of <i>Anopheles</i>, a result far from being accepted by all. Skepticism persisted for a long time.An excellent protozoologist, Laveran was not an entomologist. He was however among the first defenders of the anopheline theory. He worked extensively on establishing the relationships between <i>Anopheles</i> mosquitoes and malaria and took a close interest in the environmental conditions of the transmission. In his mind, malaria fever should henceforth be classified as a preventable disease. An era of hope thus dawned: malaria prophylaxis, based on fight against mosquitoes, could begin.</p>","PeriodicalId":18493,"journal":{"name":"Medecine tropicale et sante internationale","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine tropicale et sante internationale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48327/mtsi.v3i1.2023.312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1880, Laveran observed the causative agent of malaria. As early as 1884, he considered that mosquitoes could be responsible for the transmission of haematozoa, a hypothesis which resulted from the observation and reflection of an informed hygienist. But, as Laveran himself said, "the opinion that I defended was considered by most observers to be highly unlikely".Nearly 15 years after the discovery of the haematozoan, the elucidation of the mechanism of transmission still proved difficult to establish. A link with the existence of swamps had been established a long time before, but the true mode of transmission remained a mystery until the end of the 19th century. The implication, by Manson in 1877, of mosquitoes in the cycle of the Bancroftian filaria, then other observations of the same order, ended up attracting the attention of malariologists. Laveran himself was quickly convinced of the role of mosquitoes in carrying out the natural cycle and propagating Plasmodium, but this theory had as many detractors as supporters.In 1897, Ross showed the presence of oocysts on the stomach of mosquitoes previously gorged on a malaria patient, then in 1898, of sporozoites of bird plasmodia in mosquitoes. He was convinced that, through their bite, these insects were responsible for the transmission of human malaria agents, without being able to prove it. The results obtained by Ross were immediately confirmed in Italy by Grassi and his collaborators who, in November 1898, described the stages of Plasmodium in man and, through various experiments carried out in collaboration with British researchers, showed the role of Anopheles, a result far from being accepted by all. Skepticism persisted for a long time.An excellent protozoologist, Laveran was not an entomologist. He was however among the first defenders of the anopheline theory. He worked extensively on establishing the relationships between Anopheles mosquitoes and malaria and took a close interest in the environmental conditions of the transmission. In his mind, malaria fever should henceforth be classified as a preventable disease. An era of hope thus dawned: malaria prophylaxis, based on fight against mosquitoes, could begin.

[了解疟疾病原体的传播方式:一系列惊人的假设、观察、研究和争议]。
1880年,拉维兰发现了疟疾的病原体。早在1884年,他就认为蚊子可能是传播血虫病的原因,这是一位知情的卫生学家观察和思考的结果。但是,正如拉维兰自己所说,“我所捍卫的观点被大多数观察者认为是极不可能的”。在发现haematozoan近15年后,对其传播机制的阐明仍然难以确立。很久以前就已经建立了与沼泽存在的联系,但直到19世纪末,真正的传播方式仍然是一个谜。曼森在1877年提出的蚊子在班克罗夫特丝状虫循环中的暗示,以及其他同样顺序的观察结果,最终引起了疟疾学家的注意。Laveran本人很快就相信了蚊子在自然循环和传播疟原虫中所起的作用,但这一理论的反对者和支持者一样多。1897年,罗斯在一位疟疾病人的胃里发现了蚊子的卵囊,1898年又在蚊子的胃里发现了鸟疟原虫的孢子虫。他确信,通过它们的叮咬,这些昆虫是传播人类疟疾病原体的罪魁祸首,但他无法证明这一点。罗斯得到的结果立即在意大利得到了格拉西和他的合作者的证实。1898年11月,格拉西和他的合作者描述了疟原虫在人体内的阶段,并通过与英国研究人员合作进行的各种实验,证明了按蚊的作用,这一结果远未被所有人接受。怀疑论持续了很长一段时间。拉维兰是一位优秀的原生动物学家,但他不是昆虫学家。然而,他是疟蚊理论的第一批捍卫者之一。他在建立按蚊和疟疾之间的关系方面做了大量工作,并对传播的环境条件产生了密切的兴趣。在他看来,从此以后,疟疾应该被列为一种可预防的疾病。一个充满希望的时代由此开始:以对抗蚊子为基础的疟疾预防可以开始了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信