Assessment of Bacteria Contaminants in Different Zones and Point Sources of Sandy Beaches in Accra, Ghana.

Daniel Oduro, Stephanie Darko, Emmanuel Robert Blankson, Gloria Ivy Mensah
{"title":"Assessment of Bacteria Contaminants in Different Zones and Point Sources of Sandy Beaches in Accra, Ghana.","authors":"Daniel Oduro,&nbsp;Stephanie Darko,&nbsp;Emmanuel Robert Blankson,&nbsp;Gloria Ivy Mensah","doi":"10.1177/11786361231195152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacteria are ubiquitous in the marine environment. Increasing concern for human health has led to growing interest in contamination on public beaches. The presence of pathogenic microorganisms originating from anthropogenic activities such as defecation and disposal of sewage on beaches are of special concern. In this study, presence of pathogenic bacteria and bacterial load in beach zones and point sources were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sand core samples from the subtidal zone, intertidal zone, supratidal zone and point sources from 5 beaches in Accra, Ghana, were collected and analysed. Total aerobic, coliform and <i>Escherichia</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) counts were determined for each zone in the respective beaches. Bacteria isolates were presumptively identified using biochemical tests and confirmed with MALDI-TOF MS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean total aerobic count and total coliform counts ranged from 2.10 to 3.01 log CFU/g and 0.29 to 2.18 log CFU/g respectively while <i>E. coli</i> counts ranged from 0.12 to 1.71 log CFU/g for the beaches. Total aerobic count from point sources was 2.4-folds higher than the subtidal zone while total coliform counts were 5-folds higher in the point sources compared to the supratidal zone. Point sources had 10 times (<i>P</i> = .0016) more <i>E. coli</i> counts as compared to the subtidal zone. Isolates recovered (n = 35) belonged to 10 bacteria genera. These were <i>Bacillus</i> spp. (25.7%), <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. (14.3%), <i>Aeromonas</i> spp. (14.3%), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (14.3%), <i>Aerococcus viridans</i> (8.6%), <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (8.6%), <i>Shewanella profunda</i> (5.7%), <i>Rheinheimera soli</i> (2.9%), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (2.9%), and <i>Exiguobacterium aurantiacum</i> (2.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Point sources are major contributors to contamination on beaches. The presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in beach sand could be a public health risk. Sensitization on cleanliness in the marine environment including beaches in Ghana is needed to enhance public health and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":74187,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"11786361231195152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/e7/10.1177_11786361231195152.PMC10492474.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361231195152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacteria are ubiquitous in the marine environment. Increasing concern for human health has led to growing interest in contamination on public beaches. The presence of pathogenic microorganisms originating from anthropogenic activities such as defecation and disposal of sewage on beaches are of special concern. In this study, presence of pathogenic bacteria and bacterial load in beach zones and point sources were investigated.

Methods: Sand core samples from the subtidal zone, intertidal zone, supratidal zone and point sources from 5 beaches in Accra, Ghana, were collected and analysed. Total aerobic, coliform and Escherichia (E. coli) counts were determined for each zone in the respective beaches. Bacteria isolates were presumptively identified using biochemical tests and confirmed with MALDI-TOF MS.

Results: Mean total aerobic count and total coliform counts ranged from 2.10 to 3.01 log CFU/g and 0.29 to 2.18 log CFU/g respectively while E. coli counts ranged from 0.12 to 1.71 log CFU/g for the beaches. Total aerobic count from point sources was 2.4-folds higher than the subtidal zone while total coliform counts were 5-folds higher in the point sources compared to the supratidal zone. Point sources had 10 times (P = .0016) more E. coli counts as compared to the subtidal zone. Isolates recovered (n = 35) belonged to 10 bacteria genera. These were Bacillus spp. (25.7%), Acinetobacter spp. (14.3%), Aeromonas spp. (14.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.3%), Aerococcus viridans (8.6%), Staphylococcus spp. (8.6%), Shewanella profunda (5.7%), Rheinheimera soli (2.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2.9%), and Exiguobacterium aurantiacum (2.9%).

Conclusion: Point sources are major contributors to contamination on beaches. The presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in beach sand could be a public health risk. Sensitization on cleanliness in the marine environment including beaches in Ghana is needed to enhance public health and safety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加纳阿克拉沙滩不同区域和点源细菌污染物的评估。
背景:细菌在海洋环境中无处不在。由于对人类健康的日益关注,人们对公共海滩的污染问题越来越感兴趣。由于人类活动如在海滩上排便和处理污水而产生的病原微生物的存在特别令人关注。本研究对滩涂区和点源病原菌的存在情况和细菌负荷进行了调查。方法:采集加纳阿克拉5个海滩潮下带、潮间带、潮上带和点源的砂芯样品并进行分析。测定各海滩各区需氧菌、大肠菌群和大肠杆菌总数。结果:海滩平均总需氧菌数和总大肠菌群数分别为2.10 ~ 3.01 log CFU/g和0.29 ~ 2.18 log CFU/g,大肠杆菌数为0.12 ~ 1.71 log CFU/g。点源的需氧菌总数比潮下区高2.4倍,大肠菌群总数比潮上区高5倍。点源的大肠杆菌数量是潮下带的10倍(P = 0.0016)。分离株(35株)分属10个菌属。分别为芽孢杆菌(25.7%)、不动杆菌(14.3%)、气单胞菌(14.3%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(14.3%)、绿质航空球菌(8.6%)、葡萄球菌(8.6%)、深希瓦氏菌(5.7%)、莱茵黑氏菌(2.9%)、铜绿假单胞菌(2.9%)和金吸革杆菌(2.9%)。结论:点源是海滩污染的主要来源。沙滩上潜在致病菌的存在可能对公众健康构成威胁。需要提高对包括加纳海滩在内的海洋环境清洁的认识,以加强公众健康和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信