Effect of dietary nitrate on human muscle power: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Andrew R Coggan, Marissa N Baranauskas, Rachel J Hinrichs, Ziyue Liu, Stephen J Carter
{"title":"Effect of dietary nitrate on human muscle power: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrew R Coggan,&nbsp;Marissa N Baranauskas,&nbsp;Rachel J Hinrichs,&nbsp;Ziyue Liu,&nbsp;Stephen J Carter","doi":"10.1186/s12970-021-00463-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous narrative reviews have concluded that dietary nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) improves maximal neuromuscular power in humans. This conclusion, however, was based on a limited number of studies, and no attempt has been made to quantify the exact magnitude of this beneficial effect. Such information would help ensure adequate statistical power in future studies and could help place the effects of dietary NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> on various aspects of exercise performance (i.e., endurance vs. strength vs. power) in better context. We therefore undertook a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to quantify the effects of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> supplementation on human muscle power.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was searched using a strategy developed by a health sciences librarian. Data sources included Medline Ovid, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov , and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover experimental design to measure the effects of dietary NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> on maximal power during exercise in the non-fatigued state and the within-subject correlation could be determined from data in the published manuscript or obtained from the authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies of a total of 268 participants (218 men, 50 women) met the criteria for inclusion. The overall effect size (ES; Hedge's g) calculated using a fixed effects model was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29, 0.56; p = 6.310 × 10<sup>- 11</sup>). There was limited heterogeneity between studies (i.e., I<sup>2</sup> = 22.79%, H<sup>2</sup> = 1.30, p = 0.3460). The ES estimated using a random effects model was therefore similar (i.e., 0.45, 95% CI 0.30, 0.61; p = 1.064 × 10<sup>- 9</sup>). Sub-group analyses revealed no significant differences due to subject age, sex, or test modality (i.e., small vs. large muscle mass exercise). However, the ES in studies using an acute dose (i.e., 0.54, 95% CI 0.37, 0.71; p = 6.774 × 10<sup>- 12</sup>) was greater (p = 0.0211) than in studies using a multiple dose regimen (i.e., 0.22, 95% CI 0.01, 0.43; p = 0.003630).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute or chronic dietary NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> intake significantly increases maximal muscle power in humans. The magnitude of this effect-on average, ~ 5%-is likely to be of considerable practical and clinical importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","volume":"18 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501726/pdf/","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-021-00463-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: Previous narrative reviews have concluded that dietary nitrate (NO3-) improves maximal neuromuscular power in humans. This conclusion, however, was based on a limited number of studies, and no attempt has been made to quantify the exact magnitude of this beneficial effect. Such information would help ensure adequate statistical power in future studies and could help place the effects of dietary NO3- on various aspects of exercise performance (i.e., endurance vs. strength vs. power) in better context. We therefore undertook a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to quantify the effects of NO3- supplementation on human muscle power.

Methods: The literature was searched using a strategy developed by a health sciences librarian. Data sources included Medline Ovid, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov , and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover experimental design to measure the effects of dietary NO3- on maximal power during exercise in the non-fatigued state and the within-subject correlation could be determined from data in the published manuscript or obtained from the authors.

Results: Nineteen studies of a total of 268 participants (218 men, 50 women) met the criteria for inclusion. The overall effect size (ES; Hedge's g) calculated using a fixed effects model was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29, 0.56; p = 6.310 × 10- 11). There was limited heterogeneity between studies (i.e., I2 = 22.79%, H2 = 1.30, p = 0.3460). The ES estimated using a random effects model was therefore similar (i.e., 0.45, 95% CI 0.30, 0.61; p = 1.064 × 10- 9). Sub-group analyses revealed no significant differences due to subject age, sex, or test modality (i.e., small vs. large muscle mass exercise). However, the ES in studies using an acute dose (i.e., 0.54, 95% CI 0.37, 0.71; p = 6.774 × 10- 12) was greater (p = 0.0211) than in studies using a multiple dose regimen (i.e., 0.22, 95% CI 0.01, 0.43; p = 0.003630).

Conclusions: Acute or chronic dietary NO3- intake significantly increases maximal muscle power in humans. The magnitude of this effect-on average, ~ 5%-is likely to be of considerable practical and clinical importance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

膳食硝酸盐对人体肌肉力量的影响:一项系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
背景:先前的叙述性综述已经得出结论,膳食硝酸盐(NO3-)可以提高人类的最大神经肌肉力量。然而,这一结论是基于数量有限的研究得出的,并且没有试图量化这种有益影响的确切程度。这些信息将有助于确保在未来的研究中有足够的统计能力,并有助于更好地了解饮食NO3-对运动表现各个方面的影响(即耐力与力量与力量)。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析,以量化补充NO3对人类肌肉力量的影响。方法:文献检索采用健康科学馆员制定的策略。数据来源包括Medline Ovid、Embase、SPORTDiscus、Scopus、Clinicaltrials.gov和Google Scholar。如果研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉实验设计来测量饮食NO3-对非疲劳状态下运动时最大功率的影响,则纳入研究,并且受试者内部的相关性可以从已发表的手稿中或从作者那里获得的数据中确定。结果:共有268名参与者(218名男性,50名女性)参加了19项研究,符合入选标准。使用固定效应模型计算的总体效应大小(ES;Hedge's g)为0.42(95%置信区间(CI)0.29,0.56;p = 6.310 × 10- 11) 。研究之间的异质性有限(即I2 = 22.79%,H2 = 1.30,p = 0.3460)。因此,使用随机效应模型估计的ES相似(即0.45,95%CI 0.30,0.61;p = 1.064 × 10- 9) 。亚组分析显示,受试者的年龄、性别或测试方式(即小肌肉量运动与大肌肉量运动)没有显著差异。然而,使用急性剂量的研究中的ES(即0.54,95%CI 0.37,0.71;p = 6.774 × 10- 12) 较大(p = 0.0211)与使用多剂量方案的研究相比(即0.22,95%CI 0.01,0.43;p = 0.003630)。结论:急性或慢性饮食NO3-摄入显著增加了人类的最大肌肉力量。平均而言,这种影响的大小~ 5%-可能具有相当大的实际和临床重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (JISSN) focuses on the acute and chronic effects of sports nutrition and supplementation strategies on body composition, physical performance and metabolism. JISSN is aimed at researchers and sport enthusiasts focused on delivering knowledge on exercise and nutrition on health, disease, rehabilitation, training, and performance. The journal provides a platform on which readers can determine nutritional strategies that may enhance exercise and/or training adaptations leading to improved health and performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信