“I don't have chronic back pain anymore”: Patient Experiences in Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Chronic Back Pain

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hallie Tankha , Mark A. Lumley , Alan Gordon , Howard Schubiner , Christie Uipi , James Harris , Tor D. Wager , Yoni K. Ashar
{"title":"“I don't have chronic back pain anymore”: Patient Experiences in Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Chronic Back Pain","authors":"Hallie Tankha ,&nbsp;Mark A. Lumley ,&nbsp;Alan Gordon ,&nbsp;Howard Schubiner ,&nbsp;Christie Uipi ,&nbsp;James Harris ,&nbsp;Tor D. Wager ,&nbsp;Yoni K. Ashar","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a recently published randomized controlled trial<span>, two-thirds of the patients receiving a novel psychological treatment, pain reprocessing therapy (PRT), reported elimination or near-elimination of chronic back pain<span>. The mechanisms of PRT and related treatments remain poorly understood but are hypothesized to center on pain reappraisal, fear reduction, and exposure-potentiated extinction. Here, we investigated treatment mechanisms from the participants' perspective. A sample of 32 adults with chronic back pain who received PRT completed semi-structured posttreatment interviews about their treatment experiences. The interviews were analyzed with multiphase thematic analysis. The analyses identified 3 major themes reflecting participants’ understanding of how PRT led to pain relief: 1) reappraisal to reduce fear of pain, which included guiding participants to relate to pain as a helpful indicator, overcoming pain-related fear and avoidance, and reconceptualizing pain as a “sensation;” 2) the link between pain, emotions, and, stress, which included gaining insight into these connections and resolving difficult emotions; and 3) social connections, which included patient-provider alliance, therapist belief in the treatment model, and peer models of recovery from chronic pain. Our findings support the hypothesized mechanisms of PRT centered on pain reappraisal and fear reduction, but also highlight additional processes from the participants' perspective, including a focus on emotions and relationships. This study underscores the value of qualitative research methods in illuminating the mechanisms of novel pain therapies.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>This article presents participants' perspectives on their experience engaging in a novel psychotherapy for chronic pain, PRT. Through pain reappraisal, linking pain, emotions, and stress, and connecting with their therapist and peers, many participants reported an elimination or near-elimination of their chronic back pain with therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590023003978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In a recently published randomized controlled trial, two-thirds of the patients receiving a novel psychological treatment, pain reprocessing therapy (PRT), reported elimination or near-elimination of chronic back pain. The mechanisms of PRT and related treatments remain poorly understood but are hypothesized to center on pain reappraisal, fear reduction, and exposure-potentiated extinction. Here, we investigated treatment mechanisms from the participants' perspective. A sample of 32 adults with chronic back pain who received PRT completed semi-structured posttreatment interviews about their treatment experiences. The interviews were analyzed with multiphase thematic analysis. The analyses identified 3 major themes reflecting participants’ understanding of how PRT led to pain relief: 1) reappraisal to reduce fear of pain, which included guiding participants to relate to pain as a helpful indicator, overcoming pain-related fear and avoidance, and reconceptualizing pain as a “sensation;” 2) the link between pain, emotions, and, stress, which included gaining insight into these connections and resolving difficult emotions; and 3) social connections, which included patient-provider alliance, therapist belief in the treatment model, and peer models of recovery from chronic pain. Our findings support the hypothesized mechanisms of PRT centered on pain reappraisal and fear reduction, but also highlight additional processes from the participants' perspective, including a focus on emotions and relationships. This study underscores the value of qualitative research methods in illuminating the mechanisms of novel pain therapies.

Perspective

This article presents participants' perspectives on their experience engaging in a novel psychotherapy for chronic pain, PRT. Through pain reappraisal, linking pain, emotions, and stress, and connecting with their therapist and peers, many participants reported an elimination or near-elimination of their chronic back pain with therapy.

“我不再有慢性背痛了”:慢性背痛的疼痛再加工治疗的患者经验
在最近发表的一项随机对照试验中,三分之二的患者接受了一种新的心理治疗,疼痛再处理疗法(PRT),报告慢性背痛消除或接近消除。PRT的机制和相关治疗仍然知之甚少,但被假设为集中在疼痛重新评估,恐惧减少和暴露增强消退。在这里,我们从参与者的角度研究治疗机制。32名接受PRT治疗的慢性背痛患者完成了半结构化的治疗后访谈,内容涉及他们的治疗经历。采用多阶段专题分析对访谈进行分析。分析确定了三个主要主题,反映了参与者对PRT如何导致疼痛缓解的理解:1)重新评估以减少对疼痛的恐惧,包括引导参与者将疼痛作为一个有用的指标,克服与疼痛相关的恐惧和回避,并将疼痛重新定义为一种“感觉”;2)疼痛、情绪和压力之间的联系,包括深入了解这些联系并解决困难的情绪;3)社会关系,包括患者-提供者联盟、治疗师对治疗模式的信念和慢性疼痛康复的同伴模式。我们的研究结果支持了PRT以疼痛重新评估和恐惧减少为中心的假设机制,但也从参与者的角度强调了其他过程,包括对情绪和关系的关注。这项研究强调了定性研究方法在阐明新型疼痛治疗机制方面的价值。这篇文章介绍了参与者对他们参与一种新的治疗慢性疼痛的心理疗法——PRT的经历的看法。通过对疼痛的重新评估,将疼痛、情绪和压力联系起来,并与他们的治疗师和同伴联系,许多参与者报告说,通过治疗,他们的慢性背痛已经消除或接近消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信