The predictive values of BOAH and No-apnea score for screening obstructive sleep apnea in rotating shift worker drivers

IF 2.4 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Medicine: X Pub Date : 2023-12-15 Epub Date: 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100084
Luiz Antônio Alves de Menezes-Júnior , Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo , Raimundo Marques do Nascimento Neto , Silvia Nascimento de Freitas , Fernando Luiz Pereira de Oliveira , Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa Pimenta , George Luiz Lins Machado-Coelho , Adriana Lúcia Meireles
{"title":"The predictive values of BOAH and No-apnea score for screening obstructive sleep apnea in rotating shift worker drivers","authors":"Luiz Antônio Alves de Menezes-Júnior ,&nbsp;Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo ,&nbsp;Raimundo Marques do Nascimento Neto ,&nbsp;Silvia Nascimento de Freitas ,&nbsp;Fernando Luiz Pereira de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa Pimenta ,&nbsp;George Luiz Lins Machado-Coelho ,&nbsp;Adriana Lúcia Meireles","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the BOAH (Body mass index, Observed apnea, Age, and Hypertension) and No-apnea score's diagnostic values for detecting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk in shift workers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study with male rotating shift workers and drivers of heavy off-road machinery. The BOAH score is based on body mass index, witnessed apneas during sleep, age, and hypertension. The No-apnea score is based on neck circumference and age. Based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the severity of OSA was categorized as least mild OSA (AHI ≥5/h), moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥15/h), and severe OSA (AHI ≥30/h). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 119 workers evaluated, 84.0% had AHI ≥5, 46.2% had AHI ≥15, and 14.3% had AHI ≥30. BOAH score with 2 points for AHI ≥5, the AUC was 0.679, and sensitivity and specificity were 41.0% and 94.7%, respectively. No-apnea score with 3 points AHI ≥5, the AUC was 0.692, and sensitivity and specificity were 70.0% and 68.4%, respectively. Furthermore, using at least one of the positive scores, the AUC was higher when compared to the single tests for AHI ≥5 (AUC = 0.727). And when both scores were positive, the AUC was higher for AHI ≥30 (AUC = 0.706).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In rotating shift workers and drivers of heavy off-road machinery, BOAH, and No-apnea scores can be helpful tools in identifying individuals at risk for sleep apnea. In addition, matching the scores may increase the prediction of OSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37065,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/7b/main.PMC10497842.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142723000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the BOAH (Body mass index, Observed apnea, Age, and Hypertension) and No-apnea score's diagnostic values for detecting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk in shift workers.

Methods

Cross-sectional study with male rotating shift workers and drivers of heavy off-road machinery. The BOAH score is based on body mass index, witnessed apneas during sleep, age, and hypertension. The No-apnea score is based on neck circumference and age. Based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the severity of OSA was categorized as least mild OSA (AHI ≥5/h), moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥15/h), and severe OSA (AHI ≥30/h). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results

Among 119 workers evaluated, 84.0% had AHI ≥5, 46.2% had AHI ≥15, and 14.3% had AHI ≥30. BOAH score with 2 points for AHI ≥5, the AUC was 0.679, and sensitivity and specificity were 41.0% and 94.7%, respectively. No-apnea score with 3 points AHI ≥5, the AUC was 0.692, and sensitivity and specificity were 70.0% and 68.4%, respectively. Furthermore, using at least one of the positive scores, the AUC was higher when compared to the single tests for AHI ≥5 (AUC = 0.727). And when both scores were positive, the AUC was higher for AHI ≥30 (AUC = 0.706).

Conclusion

In rotating shift workers and drivers of heavy off-road machinery, BOAH, and No-apnea scores can be helpful tools in identifying individuals at risk for sleep apnea. In addition, matching the scores may increase the prediction of OSA.

BOAH和No-apnea评分对轮班司机阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查的预测价值
目的评价BOAH(身体质量指数、观察到的呼吸暂停、年龄和高血压)和No-apnea评分对轮班工人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)风险的诊断价值。方法对男性轮岗工人和重型越野机械驾驶员进行横断面研究。BOAH评分是基于身体质量指数、睡眠时的呼吸暂停、年龄和高血压。无呼吸暂停评分基于颈围和年龄。根据呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI),将OSA的严重程度分为轻度OSA (AHI≥5/h)、中度至重度OSA (AHI≥15/h)和重度OSA (AHI≥30/h)。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积(AUC)。结果119名受访工人中,84.0%的人AHI≥5,46.2%的人AHI≥15,14.3%的人AHI≥30。AHI≥5,BOAH评分2分,AUC为0.679,敏感性为41.0%,特异性为94.7%。无呼吸暂停评分,3分AHI≥5,AUC为0.692,敏感性为70.0%,特异性为68.4%。此外,使用至少一项阳性评分,与AHI≥5的单一测试相比,AUC更高(AUC = 0.727)。当两项评分均为阳性时,AHI≥30时AUC较高(AUC = 0.706)。结论在轮班工人和重型越野机械驾驶员中,BOAH和No-apnea评分可作为识别睡眠呼吸暂停风险个体的有效工具。此外,匹配评分可以提高对OSA的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine: X
Sleep Medicine: X Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书