Implementation of the updated Sydney system biopsy protocol improves the diagnostic yield of gastric preneoplastic conditions: Results from a real-world study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
{"title":"Implementation of the updated Sydney system biopsy protocol improves the diagnostic yield of gastric preneoplastic conditions: Results from a real-world study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The updated Sydney system biopsy protocol (USSBP) standardizes the sampling of gastric biopsies for the detection of preneoplastic conditions (<em>e.g.</em>, gastric intestinal metaplasia [GIM]), but the real-world diagnostic yield is not well-described.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine whether regular application of USSBP is associated with higher detection of chronic atrophic gastritis<span> (CAG), GIM and autoimmune gastritis (AIG).</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a real-world retrospective study at an academic urban tertiary hospital in Chile. We manually reviewed medical records from consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) from January to December 2017. Seven endoscopists who performed EGDs were categorized into two groups (USSBP ‘regular’ and USSBP ‘infrequent’) based on USSBP adherence, using minimum 20% adherence as the prespecified threshold. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between endoscopist groups and the likelihood of diagnosing CAG, GIM or AIG.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1206 patients were included in the study (mean age: 58.5; 65.3% female). The USSBP regular group demonstrated a higher likelihood of detecting CAG (20% <em>vs</em>. 5.3%; aOR 4.03, 95%CI: 2.69–6.03), GIM (12.2% <em>vs.</em> 3.4%; aOR 3.91, 95%CI: 2.39–6.42) and AIG (2.9% <em>vs.</em> 0.8%; aOR 6.52, 95%CI: 1.87–22.74) compared to infrequent group. Detection of advanced-stage CAG (Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stage III/IV) was significantly higher in the USSBP regular <em>vs.</em> infrequent group (aOR 5.84, 95%CI: 2.23–15.31).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Routine adherence to USSBP increases the detection rates of preneoplastic conditions, including CAG, GIM and AIG. Standardized implementation of USSBP should be considered in high gastric cancer risk populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 793-803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210570523003916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The updated Sydney system biopsy protocol (USSBP) standardizes the sampling of gastric biopsies for the detection of preneoplastic conditions (e.g., gastric intestinal metaplasia [GIM]), but the real-world diagnostic yield is not well-described.

Aim

To determine whether regular application of USSBP is associated with higher detection of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG), GIM and autoimmune gastritis (AIG).

Methods

We performed a real-world retrospective study at an academic urban tertiary hospital in Chile. We manually reviewed medical records from consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) from January to December 2017. Seven endoscopists who performed EGDs were categorized into two groups (USSBP ‘regular’ and USSBP ‘infrequent’) based on USSBP adherence, using minimum 20% adherence as the prespecified threshold. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between endoscopist groups and the likelihood of diagnosing CAG, GIM or AIG.

Results

1206 patients were included in the study (mean age: 58.5; 65.3% female). The USSBP regular group demonstrated a higher likelihood of detecting CAG (20% vs. 5.3%; aOR 4.03, 95%CI: 2.69–6.03), GIM (12.2% vs. 3.4%; aOR 3.91, 95%CI: 2.39–6.42) and AIG (2.9% vs. 0.8%; aOR 6.52, 95%CI: 1.87–22.74) compared to infrequent group. Detection of advanced-stage CAG (Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stage III/IV) was significantly higher in the USSBP regular vs. infrequent group (aOR 5.84, 95%CI: 2.23–15.31).

Conclusions

Routine adherence to USSBP increases the detection rates of preneoplastic conditions, including CAG, GIM and AIG. Standardized implementation of USSBP should be considered in high gastric cancer risk populations.
实施最新的悉尼系统活检方案可提高胃癌前病变的诊断率:一项真实世界研究的结果。
背景:更新后的悉尼系统活检方案(USSBP)规范了胃活检的取样,以检测肿瘤前病变(如胃肠化生[GIM]),但实际诊断率并不高:我们在智利一家城市三级学术医院开展了一项真实世界回顾性研究。我们手动查阅了 2017 年 1 月至 12 月期间接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的连续患者的病历。根据 USSBP 的依从性(以最低 20% 的依从性作为预设阈值),将 7 名进行 EGD 的内镜医师分为两组(USSBP "经常 "组和 USSBP "不经常 "组)。采用多变量逻辑回归模型估算内镜医师组别与诊断出 CAG、GIM 或 AIG 的可能性之间的几率比(aOR)和 95% 置信区间(CI):研究共纳入 1206 名患者(平均年龄:58.5 岁;65.3% 为女性)。与不常用组相比,USSBP常规组发现CAG(20% vs. 5.3%;aOR 4.03,95%CI:2.69-6.03)、GIM(12.2% vs. 3.4%;aOR 3.91,95%CI:2.39-6.42)和AIG(2.9% vs. 0.8%;aOR 6.52,95%CI:1.87-22.74)的可能性更高。与不经常进行 USSBP 的组别相比,经常进行 USSBP 的组别对晚期 CAG(胃炎手术评估链接 III/IV 期)的检测率明显更高(aOR 5.84,95%CI:2.23-15.31):结论:常规坚持 USSBP 可提高肿瘤前病变(包括 CAG、GIM 和 AIG)的检出率。在胃癌高危人群中应考虑标准化实施 USSBP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信