Geriatric assessment for older people with cancer: policy recommendations.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
P A L Seghers, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Martine Extermann, Anita O'Donovan, Sophie Pilleron, Anna Rachelle Mislang, Najia Musolino, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Anthony Staines, Charis Girvalaki, Pierre Soubeyran, Johanneke E A Portielje, Siri Rostoft, Marije E Hamaker, Dominic Trépel, Shane O'Hanlon
{"title":"Geriatric assessment for older people with cancer: policy recommendations.","authors":"P A L Seghers, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Martine Extermann, Anita O'Donovan, Sophie Pilleron, Anna Rachelle Mislang, Najia Musolino, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Anthony Staines, Charis Girvalaki, Pierre Soubeyran, Johanneke E A Portielje, Siri Rostoft, Marije E Hamaker, Dominic Trépel, Shane O'Hanlon","doi":"10.1186/s41256-023-00323-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most cancers occur in older people and the burden in this age group is increasing. Over the past two decades the evidence on how best to treat this population has increased rapidly. However, implementation of new best practices has been slow and needs involvement of policymakers. This perspective paper explains why older people with cancer have different needs than the wider population. An overview is given of the recommended approach for older people with cancer and its benefits on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. In older patients, the geriatric assessment (GA) is the gold standard to measure level of fitness and to determine treatment tolerability. The GA, with multiple domains of physical health, functional status, psychological health and socio-environmental factors, prevents initiation of inappropriate oncologic treatment and recommends geriatric interventions to optimize the patient's general health and thus resilience for receiving treatments. Multiple studies have proven its benefits such as reduced toxicity, better quality of life, better patient-centred communication and lower healthcare use. Although GA might require investment of time and resources, this is relatively small compared to the improved outcomes, possible cost-savings and compared to the large cost of oncologic treatments as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00323-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most cancers occur in older people and the burden in this age group is increasing. Over the past two decades the evidence on how best to treat this population has increased rapidly. However, implementation of new best practices has been slow and needs involvement of policymakers. This perspective paper explains why older people with cancer have different needs than the wider population. An overview is given of the recommended approach for older people with cancer and its benefits on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. In older patients, the geriatric assessment (GA) is the gold standard to measure level of fitness and to determine treatment tolerability. The GA, with multiple domains of physical health, functional status, psychological health and socio-environmental factors, prevents initiation of inappropriate oncologic treatment and recommends geriatric interventions to optimize the patient's general health and thus resilience for receiving treatments. Multiple studies have proven its benefits such as reduced toxicity, better quality of life, better patient-centred communication and lower healthcare use. Although GA might require investment of time and resources, this is relatively small compared to the improved outcomes, possible cost-savings and compared to the large cost of oncologic treatments as a whole.

Abstract Image

老年癌症患者的老年评估:政策建议。
大多数癌症发生在老年人身上,这一年龄组的负担正在增加。在过去二十年中,关于如何最好地治疗这一人群的证据迅速增加。然而,新的最佳做法的实施进展缓慢,需要决策者的参与。这篇观点论文解释了为什么老年癌症患者的需求与更广泛的人群不同。概述了对老年癌症患者的推荐方法及其对临床结果和成本效益的益处。在老年患者中,老年评估(GA)是衡量健康水平和确定治疗耐受性的金标准。《全球战略》涉及身体健康、功能状况、心理健康和社会环境因素等多个领域,可防止开始不适当的肿瘤治疗,并建议采取老年干预措施,以优化患者的总体健康状况,从而提高接受治疗的适应能力。多项研究已经证明了它的好处,如降低毒性、提高生活质量、改善以患者为中心的沟通和减少医疗保健使用。尽管遗传治疗可能需要投入时间和资源,但与改善的结果、可能的成本节约以及整体肿瘤治疗的巨大成本相比,这是相对较小的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信